IliketheBullsNBearstoo wrote:Betta Bulleavit wrote:There’s been reason for concern. But it’s like I said at the very beginning of my post. There will never be reason to believe that they will get it right UNTIL they actually get it right. But the constant pessimism an poo poo’ing on anyone that believes they can get it right has made the discussion (city wide) very depressing. I just happen to think that it’s okay to talk a little about how we can get it right. I also happen to think that getting it right might not look exactly like what the media thinks “right” is. In fact it seems like most media and fans aren’t even interested in talking about what getting it “right” would even look like.
Sure we do.I don’t think its overly depressing in here considering the circumstances. And I try to stay fairly positive, I do, but I’d like to give some constructive criticism too. Neither of us are right or wrong, we just have different opinions on how they go about their business. And it scares me that one of these Eberflus 2.0’s they are going to talk to might just say the right thing to sucker them. Poles loves to try and find those diamonds in the rough.
I'm not sure why posters seem to feel there's an actual definitive way to hire the proper coach. If there was a clear cut method, you wouldn't have multiple HC openings every single year. You're dealing with people here, everybody is different and each individual may bring a unique aspect that needs to be cultivated. To believe one approach is the only right approach is nonsensical. When initially evaluating prospective candidates, I don't want my interview team to have a defined set of guidelines. I want diversity, not a bunch of close-minded bootlickers.











