metafisical wrote:I would have loved to have brought these guys back, but only if they agreed on a 5 year, 5M per year contract (I.e., what they are actually worth).
I still remember when some people thought Fred was worth 10 million a year. lol.
Moderators: HiJiNX, 7 Footer, DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, Morris_Shatford, lebron stopper
metafisical wrote:I would have loved to have brought these guys back, but only if they agreed on a 5 year, 5M per year contract (I.e., what they are actually worth).
Harcore Fenton Mun wrote:If they're all overpaid crap, why did we waste time building around them?
Masai can't be wrong twice in a row, I guess.
Vampirate wrote:Scase wrote:GP2 wrote:Every non S-tier all-star / borderline all-star is overpaid. I dislike Fred, but Houston signing him for 2+1 (if it was 3 years guaranteed, yuck, but it wasn't) and Brooks because they had to use their cap space has worked out pretty damn well. Obviously Sengun is their best player, but those signings were positive moves at the right time. The money doesn't matter.
OG fits every team like a glove and looks better offensively on the Knicks than he ever has here. Knicks fans adore him. Who cares what the contract is turning into? This is the best many Knicks fans have felt about a team in their lifetime.
I don't know about Siakam. That feels like the worst contract of the three.
FVV is overpaid if you look at it as a AAV amount, but that's exactly the contract they wanted, a very short term one. Works out for both, FVV gets to sign another one after it, and they get the vet presence they were looking for.
Siakam was absolutely overpaid. OG you could argue is overpaid, but championship windows are only open for so long, they needed to put the team together to have a shot.Los_29 wrote:All three are thriving on their new teams. But it’s also true, we needed to move on.
Lol what?
Houston/Knicks are the 4th/5th best teams in the league. Pacers are 2 games above .500, 2 of them are thriving, the other is treadmilling as usual.
The Rockets are terrible offensively. (Sengun and Barnes are a wash here).
They get by by defense and offensive rebounding, they have the 3rd worst TS in the league. (FVV is having a horrible year offensively). They aren't doing anything in the playoffs until their offense gets much better, and they don't have a Paolo on the way to bail them out.
So FVV wouldn't count.
As for the Pacers, their issue is basically Hali. Do to Siakam's age, they likely have a small window to do any actual competing. While Hali is better than what we had, the Pacers also just never had an OG on their team. So Siakam went from one treadmil situation to another unless Hali from the first half of last year shows up.
Siakam has been good, but isn't going to pull that team up, and is 30 years old now.
OG on the Knicks is the only thing that's thriving for both player and team imo.

YogurtProducer wrote:Thaddy wrote:anotherhomer wrote:
that's a classic win-win (Mgobo, RJ and IQ) for OG is a great move
pascal trade is not as bad as it looks (Jakobe Walter, Bruce Brown, Ochai, KO) + 2026 pick is not bad at all
The Siakam trade will likely age well. The Pacers are 16th in the tankathon standings and they'll fall further next year. If they end up losing Turner they will be pretty screwed with a huge gap in the front court. Walker, Mathurin, Nembhard, and their other young guys haven't emerged at all. If we can move off Poeltl's salary and let a few others expire we could throw a big contract at Turner similar to how Houston did with Fred. This would give us a stretch C rim protector while making our rival worse and securing a higher first round pick.
Honestly aggressively pursueing Turner would be a great move. He fits what we wanna do, and makes Indiana worse.
I wonder if we could fit Turner and Poeltl on our cap sheet. I think they would be a great 2 man pairing to get 48 minutes of high level C play, and in some situations could fit beside each other if you wanna get bigger.
Like IQ/Dick/RJ/Barnes/Turner is a ton of shooting. IQ/RJ/Barnes/Turner/Poeltl is shooting and huge.
JB7 wrote:Thaddy wrote:JB7 wrote:
Turner is so overrated on this board. He was a big part of the reason the Pacers sucked at the start of the season. Yes, the Pacers have had a lot of injuries to C's, but those C's are James Wiseman & Isaiah Jackson. Turner has played 35 of the Pacers 37 games.
Turner isn't worth 30M but we need to overpay to pry him away. It would definitely make us better and the Pacers worse.
A bad pacers team means a better pick
If the Raps and Pacers swapped C’s, the Pacers would be a much improved team.
Turner would not make the Raps a better team.
I think if the Pacers get a competent C, that actually plays the role, they would be a much better team, then trying to retain Turner.
Harcore Fenton Mun wrote:If they're all overpaid crap, why did we waste time building around them?
Masai can't be wrong twice in a row, I guess.
PhilBlackson wrote:Saved himself?! lol nah THEY did it for him.
Fred walked away, OG wanted out and Pascal was demanding a contract that made no sense given the team’s lack of success. Masai was all but FORCED to finally move off of them, let’s not try to skew the narrative.
Los_29 wrote:All three are thriving on their new teams. But it’s also true, we needed to move on.
Scase wrote:Lol what?
Houston/Knicks are the 4th/5th best teams in the league. Pacers are 2 games above .500, 2 of them are thriving, the other is treadmilling as usual.
PhilBlackson wrote:Saved himself?! lol nah THEY did it for him.
Fred walked away, OG wanted out and Pascal was demanding a contract that made no sense given the team’s lack of success. Masai was all but FORCED to finally move off of them, let’s not try to skew the narrative.
Tor_Raps wrote:Who the heck has argued that we should have paid to keep that core intact? The logical argument was that it took Masai too long to figure that out himself.
The rebuild needed to happen the year we traded for Poeltl. We'd be in a much better position with more assets at our disposal if we did.
LoveMyRaps wrote:OG’s contract is gonna age like milk.
Overpay in every way, shape, and form.
PhilBlackson wrote:Saved himself?! lol nah THEY did it for him.
Fred walked away, OG wanted out and Pascal was demanding a contract that made no sense given the team’s lack of success. Masai was all but FORCED to finally move off of them, let’s not try to skew the narrative.
tdotrep2 wrote:we all knew that they were going to get paid big at the same time, we also knew that them as a core wasn't good enough. Masai waited too long to move on, got pennies on the dollar and delayed the rebuild that is happening. Had he not stuck it out with them we would be in year 3 of the rebuild with better assets from the trade + draft and had scottie actually develop his on ball ability. A lot of people saw this coming and this was a big reason for the contention the board had.
Los_29 wrote:Los_29 wrote:All three are thriving on their new teams. But it’s also true, we needed to move on.Scase wrote:Lol what?
Houston/Knicks are the 4th/5th best teams in the league. Pacers are 2 games above .500, 2 of them are thriving, the other is treadmilling as usual.
24-19, ECF appearance last year and Pascal as a Pacer is averaging 21/8/4 on a TS% of 61%. But yeah he’s not thriving. Considering he’s the worst shooter of all-time he’s been doing fantastic. Stop letting your feelings get in the way of evaluating basketball players.


Nebuchadnezzar wrote:Lol @ their overpaid:
ECF
2nd place in the West
Best defender in the league , 3rd in the east
Enough of this - they are great players and the team went in a different direction. Most of this board was wrong about all three - maybe just own it for once?