spree2kawhi wrote:Turning on Mikal now must be part of amateur hour on realgm… didn’t you all just send in apology forms?
Mikal is a machine. I'm team Mikal. That performance on christmas solidified him for me!
Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
spree2kawhi wrote:Turning on Mikal now must be part of amateur hour on realgm… didn’t you all just send in apology forms?

thebuzzardman wrote:Knicks fire Thibs and trade everyone yet?
The KnicksFix wrote:If you wanted to keep Grimes, he would not develop to what he is now. Thibs had the guy trying to play defense, with corner 3’s. Guys are relegated to their roles in the Thibs system.

NoDopeOnSundays wrote:jvsimonetti0514 wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
Nobody has ever said the bench is good, that's just a strawman argument these posters use to defend Tom. Everyone says the bench needs to play, regardless of outcome, like the Celtics don't have a good bench at all but they still play more than ours.
You were touting the bench’s net rating the other day. Proudly point out that they were top 10 in league. Why would you do that if you didn’t think the bench was good?
You're quoting a post about strawman arguments, while using a strawman argument, the irony is beautiful. I can point out that the bench is net positive on the season, while still not thinking they're good, because their net rating is just a statistical fact. You won't find me saying the bench is objectively good, because I haven't said that I have said they need to play regardless of whether or not they're good because most benches in the NBA are not good, and the most important thing about utilizing your bench is to help your starters.
Can you please explain to me why Tom's benches are always low minutes? Just one of you Thibs defenders, please just tell me why every fanbase complains about his usage of the bench. In 13 years, his average bench is ranked 24th in MPG, so in 13 years every bench he has basically sucks, or does he just not use them much. The Bulls fans complained about it, the Wolves fans did it and now we do it. I need to know how this could happen three times, in three separate places, to three different rosters in three different eras of the NBA. I want to see you throw logic in the bushes to defend this.
thebuzzardman wrote:The KnicksFix wrote:If you wanted to keep Grimes, he would not develop to what he is now. Thibs had the guy trying to play defense, with corner 3’s. Guys are relegated to their roles in the Thibs system.
Grimes got developed here. He's not anything more in Dallas right now than he was here. He had good games here too, then he'd disappear. Knicks made a decision they were comfortable with Deuce taking that role.
Do I wish they would have kept him? Sure. But he's not suddenly some incredible player or really all that different.
Thibs started him for f*cks sake.
thebuzzardman wrote:Knicks fire Thibs and trade everyone yet?

DaGawd wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:Buttah304 wrote:I do believe the fanbase is suffering from the sky is falling epidemic.
While I will fully acknowledge the minutes are a legitimate concern, and the more than likely outcome is us limping into the playoffs, I’m trying to look bigger picture.
Sports journalists are truly pathetic. For the last two seasons all I heard on the radio, on air, and on podcasts was that the Cavs were pretenders, not tough, ill fitting and that a shake to the core was needed.
Now those very same people are Mia Khalifling them on a regular basis with every other statement being “historical.”
Is it possible, and hear me out, that Allen-Mobley-Garland-Spida playing together for 117 games has helped? Or what about their initial core of Allen-Mobley-Garland having played 157 games together, nearly two full seasons.
It’s not just that. The roster construction is a culmination of the last few years. Dean Wade was undrafted and they recently signed him for 3/18. Sam Merril was pick #60 by NO, added/dropped by MIL and scooped up by the Cavs for 3/5. Okoro, who never panned out as a top 5 pick, was still a young defensive wing developing a 3 and he got 3/32. They wanted more shooting got Strus 4/62 and Niang 3/25. Ty Jerome was shown the door by OKC, Pheonix and GS. Cavs thought they found something and gave him 2/5.
The point is, this has been a culmination of adding talent, player development, taking chances, and their core getting more experience for the past three seasons.
This Knicks SL has played 37 games together. The core had a huge shakeup in general. I understand it’s NY and when the ugliness shows it’s the coaching staff, players, medical team, cleaning crew, concession crew and Dolans fault.
Think everyone should get a little drunk tonight it’s Saturday.
The Cavs also fired the coach that helped turn things around, they weren't afraid to move on when they had to. And the funny part is Bickerstaff has turned the Pistons around.
i think a lot of the staunch thibs backers are afraid of moving on because of the terrible luck we’ve had with coaches before he got here which is totally understandable. hell i was the same way for awhile before this szn, but there comes a time when you gotta recognize the pattern and peep the signs that it might be time to pivot
3toheadmelo wrote:When we fire thibs for a worse coach it's going to start a war you may not be able to win. don't go down this path brother!
spree2kawhi wrote:Turning on Mikal now must be part of amateur hour on realgm… didn’t you all just send in apology forms?
thebuzzardman wrote:Knicks fire Thibs and trade everyone yet?

Context wrote:Kampuchea wrote:Kampuchea wrote::lol:
Clyde here doing a book signing I just walked by him, wearing some wild suit as usual. Some animal print
Winning and Grinning book, he’s at American Dream in NJ
I’m gonna ask him about these realgm minutes police
![]()
I dare you!


NoDopeOnSundays wrote:Gravy wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
Shame you have to lie so much.
Dice could be interim, but acting like there's no other coaches out there is comical. Like Mazzulla, Daignault, Jenkins were household names before they got coaching jobs. The Celtics let Ime go and had Mazzulla right there, it says a lot about Thibs if his coaching tree doesn't have any success stories.
viewtopic.php?p=113151542#p113151542NoDopeOnSundays wrote: Brunson is the reason, he is a top 10 player on his own merit and talent. There is no bigger reason for us being a contender moving forward than him being a superstar on deal vastly underpaying him relative to his performance. The Celtics should be a good indication of player vs coach, I mean Ime is a great coach, but the players matter more.
Which coach? Upgrade Bryant or Dice, the culture is set. I don't want to go through another season of watching guys drop like flies before and during the playoffs.
You've always hated Thibs and think anybody else could do a much better job. So lets all tell Dolan to make Dice the coach since Thibs is close to getting fired any day now.
Hey Gravy, how can we upgrade Bryant if he's gone? Why am I mentioning that Bryant is gone in the other post but want to upgrade him in the one you posted, that's right, because you're using an older post. Even then, I'd take Dice as an interim coach, we're not winning a title this year with Thibs anyway, just as we won't win one with Dice.
I don't hate Thibs, I don't hate anyone, this is you just applying some nonsense because you're emotional about this. I do however want him gone, and I have been talking about his minutes abuse since last season.
Kampuchea wrote:Context wrote:Kampuchea wrote:
I’m gonna ask him about these realgm minutes police
![]()
I dare you!
He wants Thibs gone, slammed the table in disgust once I said the word “minutes” and said Thibs is going to end OGs career. His handlers came over and calmed him down

Gravy wrote:JayTWill wrote:Gravy wrote:I dont even know how we got the players we have now lol. Thats why I dont do trades and transactions. If you believe Atkinson or anyone except Thibs would have us with the same record as the Cavs, ok, I cant really prove or disprove that. I've noticed in the last 20 years of Knicksdom we always blame the coach first then years later after he's fired we realize the players he had were actually not that good. Happens every time
So you continue to shoot down the idea of a coaching change possibly improving the team but you can't think of a single trade idea to possibly improve the team? You might be the Tom Thibodeau of posters with your lack of imagination and stubbornness. Just kidding....![]()
It's not about simply blaming the coach. I was one of the few people that has been critical of the moves they have made after the OG trade. I was not a fan of the team they had built and the way they had managed their assets but none of that can be changed now. They can't bring Grimes and those second round picks back. They can't bring those 5 1sts, a swap, and high 2nd back. They can't stop iHart from walking. They can't bring DDV back. I don't want them to bring Randle back.
They have limited trade assets to make a significant improvement to the roster. They have limited room for internal growth outside of the rookies. More vet min additions are unlikely to make a bigger impact than the guys currently on the bench. So where else can I look to possibly improve the team?
How can you watch OKC manhandle the Knicks with young depth and not think investing time in developing the youth on the court could be beneficial?
How could watch OKC switch, trap, blitz, double-team, play zone etc with a historically great defense while the other coach has been running the same defense forever no matter the personnel and not think there could be some possible improvements to the coach's defensive strategy?
How could you watch Brunson pound the air out of the ball year after year no matter how much talent he has around him while the team plays near the slowest pace in the league once again and not think there could possibly be some improvement in the coach's offensive strategy?
Who is the new coach you want to get?
JayTWill wrote:Gravy wrote:JayTWill wrote:
So you continue to shoot down the idea of a coaching change possibly improving the team but you can't think of a single trade idea to possibly improve the team? You might be the Tom Thibodeau of posters with your lack of imagination and stubbornness. Just kidding....![]()
It's not about simply blaming the coach. I was one of the few people that has been critical of the moves they have made after the OG trade. I was not a fan of the team they had built and the way they had managed their assets but none of that can be changed now. They can't bring Grimes and those second round picks back. They can't bring those 5 1sts, a swap, and high 2nd back. They can't stop iHart from walking. They can't bring DDV back. I don't want them to bring Randle back.
They have limited trade assets to make a significant improvement to the roster. They have limited room for internal growth outside of the rookies. More vet min additions are unlikely to make a bigger impact than the guys currently on the bench. So where else can I look to possibly improve the team?
How can you watch OKC manhandle the Knicks with young depth and not think investing time in developing the youth on the court could be beneficial?
How could watch OKC switch, trap, blitz, double-team, play zone etc with a historically great defense while the other coach has been running the same defense forever no matter the personnel and not think there could be some possible improvements to the coach's defensive strategy?
How could you watch Brunson pound the air out of the ball year after year no matter how much talent he has around him while the team plays near the slowest pace in the league once again and not think there could possibly be some improvement in the coach's offensive strategy?
Who is the new coach you want to get?
Since you seem to be so caught up in the idea of people simply blaming the coach I will quote myself to show my opinion on the coach, the roster and the depth from September right after the KAT trade...Spoiler:
I have been critical of Thibs' coaching, the top players, the bench, the roster construction and the organization's asset management. This off-season I was ready to move on from Randle, Mitch and Thibs. Having a discussion about new coaches is a lot more difficult than having a discussion about new players since many good coaches were previously unknown and unproven until given an opportunity. Thibs has already been given plenty of opportunities in this league. We know exactly who he is.
I'm less concerned with who the coach is and more concerned with what their coaching philosophy will be. I just want a coach that is more creative offensively and more flexible defensively along with being better at managing the rotation. It's great that Thibs can get guys to run through a wall for him but it would be nice if there was an actual strategy to go around or over the wall instead sometimes.
If you just want me to throw out a realistic name that should be available I wouldn't mind the organization interviewing James Borrego, former Hornets coach and the Cavs 2nd option behind Atkinson this off-season. 47 years old. From the Pop coaching tree. Considered a good offensive mind. Had some experience building an offense around a small scoring guard in Kemba before they went into a quick reset trading Kemba away and got the team back to 42 wins in a couple years. Flamed out in the play-in game 2 years in a row with a young roster.
His offensive system requires more player movement and off-ball screening but simplifies the reads for the on-ball player which I think would be beneficial for a team like ours that lacks a true distributor in the current rotation.
I'm also open to making adjustments to the roster and rotation as I feel the team has too many guys that want/need touches similar to the pre-OG 2023-2024 Knicks but not enough guys to do the little things. I will save that discussion for the trade board or trade thread. So, what changes would you make? Do you just want to continue what we are doing right now?
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
Guano wrote:Leon isn't a guy that's gonna let a friend ruin his legacy. Thibs will be gone in this offseason when we lose in the 2nd round.
Just hope we don't suffer any major injuries between then. If not we will have some more highs and lows this season when we inevitably lose in the 2nd round
TheGreenArrow wrote:Guano wrote:Leon isn't a guy that's gonna let a friend ruin his legacy. Thibs will be gone in this offseason when we lose in the 2nd round.
Just hope we don't suffer any major injuries between then. If not we will have some more highs and lows this season when we inevitably lose in the 2nd round
?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g
Heads are about to roll Guanyyyyyyy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.