Stratmaster wrote:TheGOATRises007 wrote:Stratmaster wrote:
We aren't comparing them to the other players in the league at the time. Name something you think Rose did better than Lavine does.
Lavine scored 1700 more points than Rose in the same number of games as a Bull. He is a better shooter, and a better 3 point shooter. Lavine is a better rebounder. Rose gets an edge on assists but was never a huge assist guy, and lets face it he had better offensive players around him to make shots.
Rose's best TS% with the Bulls was .550. Rose shot under 45% from the field and 30% from 3. Rose certainly wasn't a better defender.
You said this, "It is based on the OP definition of talent as compared to the rest of the league"
If you think Lavine is more talented than Rose, then our record should be much better than what it is, but it isn't.
Rose's impact dwarfs LaVine's.
His impact metrics were top 5 or top 10 in the league. LaVine is nowhere near that. It's not even close.
And I'm pretty sure Deng, Boozer, Noah, etc. are not better offensively than DeRozan, Vucevic, etc. You know they're not better either.
So... you can't think of anything Rosec was better at. Got it.
Rose had better teammates. Of course their record was better. He was on arguably the best team in the league at the time.
Their BPM was exactly the same. +1.8
VORP... almost exactly the same. 13.8 for Rose. 13.6 fir Lavine
I told you his impact metrics during his MVP and subsequent season dwarf LaVine's
You ignored it
But we won't see eye to eye if you think LaVine is the most talented Bulls player post MJ
That's an egregious stance to take



















