VFX wrote:Knightro wrote:VFX wrote:
What I think will happen?
Exactly what you proposed. Cycling picks maybe attached to some bench guy in order to not have them make decisions “for later” whatever that means.
I don’t expect them to really address anything and the tag line will be “man we were really injured last season we really need a full season to know which way to go” in between a series of sniffles. They’ll feign like they have zero idea how skillsets work and aren’t familiar with who they are handing millions upon millions of dollars to.
I think it will be a big postseason. I’ve also been saying that every season going on 3 years and it really hasn’t been true.
There is something to be gained from watching players step up and get their number called. I would categorize that as internal development experience. We know a player like Cole or Suggs can randomly step up on a Tuesday and generate enough for a win. Thats great. That gives us more information about Mosely than anything related to roster decisions though.
Everything you're saying would be a lot more justifiable if the Magic had hit a plateau in their team development.
But that hasn't even happened yet. I think if they get Franz and Suggs back to go with what we've seen out of Paolo that they're absolutely capable of winning a playoff series.
Now if they get into the playoffs this year and get swept in the first round? Ok sure, then they need to evaluate where and why the plateau took place and make the appropriate adjustments to the roster.
But we're just not there yet. The goal this year should be to advance further than last year.
Ok I’ll bite.
If Orlando wins a playoff series, then they are right on track despite this season being a plethora of injuries and not having enough continuity as a group. Run it back because they overachieved.
If they lose in a similar fashion as last season, then there is a lot of work to be done in the offseason to address those issues. Players should be moved to build around their core. Make adjustments on the margins.
I think the takeaway from management will be option A regardless of outcome.
This is the bit I'm struggling with.
If we win a series, we have "overachieved"???
I just don't see it that way. Are Cleveland overachieving? I mean they haven't substantially changed their roster since they got taken to 7 games in R1 and lost in R2.
Seems to me like Cleveland have internally developed.
Seems to me like Orlando have internally developed. Some stat that got posted lately referenced Paolo and Franz as 2 of the players in the entire league at all positions whose offensive output had improved the most (O-LEBRON iirc). That's big internal development, objectively. Suggs has also developed. Black is no longer standing in the corner on every possession - he has developed. Goga has developed massively - he is ranked just outside the top 50 in total EPM for the whole NBA.
So, if everyone as an individual has developed internally (objectively speaking) and the team is on course for a similar win rate last year despite missing key players for huge chunks, then objectively the team play and coaching have developed internally.
That means we are a much better team. End of.
All that remains is to get healthy and put it into practice in the post-ASB and playoffs.
We have every chance - in that context - of improving on last year's postseason. That despite the East being much tougher this year.
So I just don't buy any kind of narrative that the positives of this year are somehow diminished in value, in significance or a simple overachievement.
I don't think we should have gotten to today without a consolidation already. But now we're here, with the very limited potential to add an impact player (CJ McC is prob the only one I see as viable), it seems churlish to deny the current team the significance of what they're all doing.