NZB2323 wrote:I’m glad to see Ben Johnson is the favorite. I would have liked Vrabel as well.
I think betting odds have become the most reliable source of "insider info"
Moderators: HomoSapien, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10
NZB2323 wrote:I’m glad to see Ben Johnson is the favorite. I would have liked Vrabel as well.
patryk7754 wrote:NZB2323 wrote:I’m glad to see Ben Johnson is the favorite. I would have liked Vrabel as well.
I think betting odds have become the most reliable source of "insider info"
Jcool0 wrote:jnrjr79 wrote:Jeffster81 wrote:
I think it very telling that McCarthy set up an interview with the Bears so quickly after parting ways with Dallas and the Saints do not get an interview until next week.
I think the Bears are McCarthy top priority with the Saints as a fallback. Would not surprise me that we hear McCarthy cancel his interview with the Saints, later in the week.
I think we'll pretty quickly see how much the Bears are all-in on Johnson (or not) depending on how things play out with McCarthy (and maybe Carroll?) this week.
Total Bears thing is to panic and hire McCarthy now instead of waiting on Ben Johnson.
Dresden wrote:Jcool0 wrote:jnrjr79 wrote:
I think we'll pretty quickly see how much the Bears are all-in on Johnson (or not) depending on how things play out with McCarthy (and maybe Carroll?) this week.
Total Bears thing is to panic and hire McCarthy now instead of waiting on Ben Johnson.
OTH, if Bears wait on McCarthy, and then lose out on Johnson, and meanwhile McCarthy goes elsewhere, people will be saying that is "a total Bears thing". It's a tough situation. Seems like they have to find out from Johnson if he wants to come or not.
WookieOnRitalin wrote:Game 1. It's where the series is truly 0-0.
panthermark wrote:Dresden wrote:Jcool0 wrote:
Total Bears thing is to panic and hire McCarthy now instead of waiting on Ben Johnson.
OTH, if Bears wait on McCarthy, and then lose out on Johnson, and meanwhile McCarthy goes elsewhere, people will be saying that is "a total Bears thing". It's a tough situation. Seems like they have to find out from Johnson if he wants to come or not.
If the Bears managed to miss out on Vrabel, Johnson and McCarthy, how else would you describe it other than "same old Bears"?
I wish I knew who their top choice was. I doubt we will ever know because whomever they eventually hire will have been their top choice all along according to any press releases and official statements that go out.
nomorezorro wrote:
schefter throwing a lot of cold water on the johnson/raiders smoke. it's all pretty clearly just his opinion/analysis of the known weaknesses of the raiders, but i don't think he'd be out here scoffing at the appeal of the vegas job if he had sources indicating that johnson was highly likely to go there
panthermark wrote:Dresden wrote:Jcool0 wrote:
Total Bears thing is to panic and hire McCarthy now instead of waiting on Ben Johnson.
OTH, if Bears wait on McCarthy, and then lose out on Johnson, and meanwhile McCarthy goes elsewhere, people will be saying that is "a total Bears thing". It's a tough situation. Seems like they have to find out from Johnson if he wants to come or not.
If the Bears managed to miss out on Vrabel, Johnson and McCarthy, how else would you describe it other than "same old Bears"?
I wish I knew who their top choice was. I doubt we will ever know because whomever they eventually hire will have been their top choice all along according to any press releases and official statements that go out.
WookieOnRitalin wrote:Game 1. It's where the series is truly 0-0.
Dresden wrote:panthermark wrote:Dresden wrote:
OTH, if Bears wait on McCarthy, and then lose out on Johnson, and meanwhile McCarthy goes elsewhere, people will be saying that is "a total Bears thing". It's a tough situation. Seems like they have to find out from Johnson if he wants to come or not.
If the Bears managed to miss out on Vrabel, Johnson and McCarthy, how else would you describe it other than "same old Bears"?
I wish I knew who their top choice was. I doubt we will ever know because whomever they eventually hire will have been their top choice all along according to any press releases and official statements that go out.
My point was that it's a tough situation. The OP said hiring McCarthy instead of waiting for Johnson would be so "Bears". My point was if they do wait for Johnson, they may miss on both of them, and people would be blaming THAT on them. If you have the sense the Bears are going to screw it up no matter what, you will find what you are looking for most likely.
nomorezorro wrote:i also dunno why there's this perception the bears have to act fast on mccarthy. the only other known suitor for him is new orleans, they're not interviewing him until next week, it's not a particularly attractive opening and the buzz is they're not super interested in him anyway.
if he's threatening to take that job instead of waiting a couple of weeks for us to do our due diligence...dare him to do it? i'm personally not particularly scared about the possibility

Dresden wrote:OTH, if Bears wait on McCarthy, and then lose out on Johnson, and meanwhile McCarthy goes elsewhere, people will be saying that is "a total Bears thing". It's a tough situation. Seems like they have to find out from Johnson if he wants to come or not.
nomorezorro wrote:
schefter throwing a lot of cold water on the johnson/raiders smoke. it's all pretty clearly just his opinion/analysis of the known weaknesses of the raiders, but i don't think he'd be out here scoffing at the appeal of the vegas job if he had sources indicating that johnson was highly likely to go there
patryk7754 wrote:nomorezorro wrote:
schefter throwing a lot of cold water on the johnson/raiders smoke. it's all pretty clearly just his opinion/analysis of the known weaknesses of the raiders, but i don't think he'd be out here scoffing at the appeal of the vegas job if he had sources indicating that johnson was highly likely to go there
a lot of cold water is an understatement. They make a great point about Johnson not even taking the interview if Brady isn't there. Adam bringing up all the coaches and GMs they have on payroll made me think, can they even afford Johnson? Im sure the cash flow is different know that they are in vegas, but it wasn't too long ago that Marc Davis was reportedly the "poorest" owner as far as having cash on hand. If I remember right, one of the big reasons (if not the main reason) Mack got traded because he literally didn't have the cash to pay him a new contract. That or he's that cheap.
If he's paying 4 coaches (one of which is Gruden and I imagine that was expensive) 3 GMs, would he be able to afford or willing to pay a coach around 15m?
dougthonus wrote:I mean if that happens, it is absolute crap work by your front office.
If you want Johnson and Johnson is your number one guy, go make an offer of whatever it takes to land him today. Nothing complicated about it.
WookieOnRitalin wrote:Game 1. It's where the series is truly 0-0.