Trade Market Check: Buyers and Sellers

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

the_process
RealGM
Posts: 29,104
And1: 10,313
Joined: May 01, 2010

Re: Trade Market Check: Buyers and Sellers 

Post#81 » by the_process » Fri Jan 17, 2025 7:53 pm

HartfordWhalers wrote:
the_process wrote:
dcstanley wrote:With the Embiid news, Philly would be intriguing sellers. I can see Oubre, Martin, and Yabusele drawing interest from a number of teams.


I would hope OKC has interest in Yabusele. The Sixers certainly should have interest in obtaining their pick back.


That seems quite a leap in value.


Didn't mean to imply straight up. My mistake.
HartfordWhalers
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 47,322
And1: 20,917
Joined: Apr 07, 2010
 

Re: Trade Market Check: Buyers and Sellers 

Post#82 » by HartfordWhalers » Fri Jan 17, 2025 8:10 pm

the_process wrote:
HartfordWhalers wrote:
the_process wrote:
I would hope OKC has interest in Yabusele. The Sixers certainly should have interest in obtaining their pick back.


That seems quite a leap in value.


Didn't mean to imply straight up. My mistake.


So how would you bridge that gap? Because it looks quite big.
Devilanche
General Manager
Posts: 7,743
And1: 2,442
Joined: Dec 22, 2010

Re: Trade Market Check: Buyers and Sellers 

Post#83 » by Devilanche » Fri Jan 17, 2025 8:17 pm

Magic_Johnny12 wrote:What is it called when you’re a team that have obvious needs and have the ability to get better with minimal effort, but won’t because you’re too risk adverse, lack any type of creativity and if the trade isnt franchise altering you want nothing to do with it?

You’re completely content with your current team regardless of outcome/injuries or blatant needs and even though your team can and is ready to compete at a high level NOW you choose to coast because your team is young enough to justify it for a few seasons to recoup some of the money you lost during the rebuild?

Is that just called smart business lol?

Internal development.
MoneyTalks41890 wrote:No I’m myopic and shortsighted and I want my pile of draft picks.


meekrab wrote:Nothing Jerry Rein$dorf loves more than a visit from Cash Considerations.
Sactowndog
Kings Forum Mock Draft Champ
Posts: 4,446
And1: 1,815
Joined: May 27, 2017

Re: Trade Market Check: Buyers and Sellers 

Post#84 » by Sactowndog » Fri Jan 17, 2025 9:49 pm

LightTheBeam wrote:Going to be interesting to see what Sac does.

The expectation is they are going to be buyers, but if they have a bad read on Fox, that could maybe push them into selling him.

The Cousins and Hali trades were both out of nowhere. So even though the word is Kings are doing everything they can to get Fox to stay, that could be a bluff.


The other factor is the Kings need a 6’8” and longer wing. Those guys are hard to find and hard to trade a guard to acquire. You almost always have to give up a better guard just to get an average wing.
ejftw
RealGM
Posts: 11,609
And1: 5,661
Joined: Nov 30, 2008
Contact:
         

Re: Trade Market Check: Buyers and Sellers 

Post#85 » by ejftw » Fri Jan 17, 2025 10:03 pm

Hard to see Clippers selling, and hard to see them buy with the limited assets they have. Wouldn't be surprised if they shopped some of the overloaded wing guys they have like Mann or Coffey, especially if they feel Jordan Miller is ready and convert him. Bones as well would probably be on the block, and I'd hope Porter, albeit, can't see anyone really offering for Kevin. PJ Tucker as expiring ballast is the best asset they have, sadly.
Daddy 801
General Manager
Posts: 8,453
And1: 2,941
Joined: May 14, 2013
 

Re: Trade Market Check: Buyers and Sellers 

Post#86 » by Daddy 801 » Sat Jan 18, 2025 9:54 am

NYG wrote:
SkyHook wrote:Jazz are most likely a seller who can also take on additional money to help other teams dip below the tax.


What would you charge to dump salary?


Picks or a young player the Jazz like. Clearing books is not a value.
Daddy 801
General Manager
Posts: 8,453
And1: 2,941
Joined: May 14, 2013
 

Re: Trade Market Check: Buyers and Sellers 

Post#87 » by Daddy 801 » Sat Jan 18, 2025 9:58 am

SkyHook wrote:
NYG wrote:
psman2 wrote:
A Utah 1st. No interest in Clarkson.


Sorry meant Sexton


Utah doesn't want additional money beyond next season. Probably puts a damper on this.


Just depends on what incentive comes attached to that salary.
Kiss of Death
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,392
And1: 1,572
Joined: Jun 24, 2022
 

Re: Trade Market Check: Buyers and Sellers 

Post#88 » by Kiss of Death » Mon Mar 3, 2025 1:28 am

Kiss of Death wrote:I doubt the Rockets do anything.
Jock Landale is probably available and they can take back as much as $15.5 M for his $8 M (basically expiring) contract.
They have an open roster spot and can use the NTMLE to take on a player without sending anything out.
They’ll probably listen to what’s available, then wait for the buyout market.
If nothing materializes, I could see them converting Nate Williams two-way to a standard contract for the rest of the season.


I called it.

Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=Czvoq_OfH0ZSMgHqWBWrFA

Return to Trades and Transactions