Wembanyama, I'm concerned (Part 2)

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

Perishable517
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,872
And1: 2,101
Joined: Apr 04, 2008
Location: Milwaukee
 

Re: Wembanyama, I'm concerned(Part 2) 

Post#21 » by Perishable517 » Mon Jan 20, 2025 4:08 am

Milenkovic wrote:I can't believe a second thread to this topic has been opened lol
And yet, here we are!

Sent from my CPH2417 using RealGM mobile app
" If you take away the alc l r g on Malcolm Brogdon is Mom Bod :("
- emunney

"I’d place the phone directly between my cheeks while I let one rip right in John Hammond’s ear."
- BroncoBuck
xxSnEaKyPxx
RealGM
Posts: 18,432
And1: 19,060
Joined: Jun 02, 2007

Re: Wembanyama, I'm concerned(Part 2) 

Post#22 » by xxSnEaKyPxx » Mon Jan 20, 2025 4:11 am

Rust_Cohle wrote:
xxSnEaKyPxx wrote:
OriginalRed wrote:Im not concerned in the slightest about Wemby himself. Its the rest of the team that people should be worried about and who the Spurs plan pairing with him for the future. They need a dynamic scoring guard to take the offensive load off Wemby whose both young but also a decent/good passer that can lob it to him for easy buckets. The rest of the team should fill itself out once they acquire that person, whoever it will be.

They are in a weird position now, because they are too good to get a top pick, but not good enough to compete, and they lack the young talent to make a significant trade for help.


For the season sure, but they have a treasure cb sat do draft picks to package in a trade and cap flexibility to nab that #2 star. They are probably second to only the Thunder for options

Which picks? Not doubting you, just genuinely don't know.

Usually you need some top end young talent to trade with picks to acquire the star type players though, and I just don't think the Spurs have anyone THAT valuable after Wemby.
Castle Black
Head Coach
Posts: 6,678
And1: 17,255
Joined: Jul 21, 2017
       

Re: Wembanyama, I'm concerned(Part 2) 

Post#23 » by Castle Black » Mon Jan 20, 2025 4:17 am

Honestly Wemby elevating this Spurs team to a Play-In contender is the worst thing for us right now. Our roster is just in desperate need of more size and talent. That is evident any time you watch them play (we had the 1st Overall Pick in the draft just 18 months ago for a reason). We desperately need to be selecting in the top-5 again this Summer, not trying to compete for a Play-In spot where we would immediately get destroyed in a series with an actual Playoff-caliber team.

I would normally never have this attitude, because I do think Playoff experience, even if it’s just one series, can really help a young team grow. But this Spurs roster is bottom-6 in the league without Wemby on it. It is seriously devoid of any real difference-makers, at least the level needed to compete in this league, and another top-5 pick would be huge for us.

The one silver lining is that we do have some draft capital (our own + other teams that we’ve acquired via various trades) at our disposal to potentially make some deals in the not-so-distant future. That’s really what I’m banking on at this point.
Image
pipfan
RealGM
Posts: 12,426
And1: 4,297
Joined: Aug 07, 2010

Re: Wembanyama, I'm concerned(Part 2) 

Post#24 » by pipfan » Mon Jan 20, 2025 5:47 am

I really thought they should have taken Matas #8 last year (Bulls' fans very happy Spurs traded that pick). Sure, a 2031 pick is nice, but that's six years from now.

I would still consider Lauri in the summer. He and Wemby could be devastating together, and his price tag will be lower. Spurs wouldn't have to include Vassell, Castle, Sochan or Wemby-lots of picks and expiring deals.
SweaterBae
Veteran
Posts: 2,887
And1: 4,078
Joined: May 03, 2023
   

Re: Wembanyama, I'm concerned(Part 2) 

Post#25 » by SweaterBae » Mon Jan 20, 2025 6:29 am

Liam_Gallagher wrote:Am I gonna get ostracized if I say he shoots WAY too many threes?


No, it limits him severely, which is crazy.
User avatar
WestGOAT
Veteran
Posts: 2,594
And1: 3,518
Joined: Dec 20, 2015

Re: Wembanyama, I'm concerned(Part 2) 

Post#26 » by WestGOAT » Mon Jan 20, 2025 8:29 am

UglyBugBall wrote:I don't think you can win a title with wemby as the number one option. He's like Pippen to me, an all time good second option. Well see, but I dont think he has the tools or skillset.


Yes you can, Wemby does not need to be first option on offense at all. As long if he impacts enough on defence then he is doing more than his part. All-time defensive impact + 2nd option on offensive is still historic stuff.

Throughout the history of the NBA I can only think of 3-4 players that were defensive anchors / all-time great defenders while being first option that won the title:
- Peak Duncan
- Peak Hakeem
- Peak Kareem
- Peak Wilt is interesting, he finally won a title in '67 but he was taking way less shots than earlier in his career and Hal Greer was leading the team in FGA. In the playoffs he was even 4th in FGA on his team

And none of their teams were actually that great on offence, except Kareem and he had an all-time PG in Oscar to support him. Regardless, unless you can play make like Jokic, the day of force-feeding your center are long-gone if you want to have a good offense in the modern NBA.

Wemby is probably better off focusing on his strengths than trying to imitate KD. He could be a modern day Bill Russell with better offense, that is still GOAT-stuff.
Image
spotted in Bologna
Ayt
RealGM
Posts: 59,166
And1: 15,034
Joined: Jun 27, 2005

Re: Wembanyama, I'm concerned(Part 2) 

Post#27 » by Ayt » Mon Jan 20, 2025 9:05 am

WestGOAT wrote:
UglyBugBall wrote:I don't think you can win a title with wemby as the number one option. He's like Pippen to me, an all time good second option. Well see, but I dont think he has the tools or skillset.


Yes you can, Wemby does not need to be first option on offense at all. As long if he impacts enough on defence then he is doing more than his part. All-time defensive impact + 2nd option on offensive is still historic stuff.

Throughout the history of the NBA I can only think of 3-4 players that were defensive anchors / all-time great defenders while being first option that won the title:
- Peak Duncan
- Peak Hakeem
- Peak Kareem
- Peak Wilt is interesting, he finally won a title in '67 but he was taking way less shots than earlier in his career and Hal Greer was leading the team in FGA. In the playoffs he was even 4th in FGA on his team

And none of their teams were actually that great on offence, except Kareem and he had an all-time PG in Oscar to support him. Regardless, unless you can play make like Jokic, the day of force-feeding your center are long-gone if you want to have a good offense in the modern NBA.

Wemby is probably better off focusing on his strengths than trying to imitate KD. He could be a modern day Bill Russell with better offense, that is still GOAT-stuff.


Giannis.
User avatar
WestGOAT
Veteran
Posts: 2,594
And1: 3,518
Joined: Dec 20, 2015

Re: Wembanyama, I'm concerned(Part 2) 

Post#28 » by WestGOAT » Mon Jan 20, 2025 9:29 am

Ayt wrote:
WestGOAT wrote:
UglyBugBall wrote:I don't think you can win a title with wemby as the number one option. He's like Pippen to me, an all time good second option. Well see, but I dont think he has the tools or skillset.


Yes you can, Wemby does not need to be first option on offense at all. As long if he impacts enough on defence then he is doing more than his part. All-time defensive impact + 2nd option on offensive is still historic stuff.

Throughout the history of the NBA I can only think of 3-4 players that were defensive anchors / all-time great defenders while being first option that won the title:
- Peak Duncan
- Peak Hakeem
- Peak Kareem
- Peak Wilt is interesting, he finally won a title in '67 but he was taking way less shots than earlier in his career and Hal Greer was leading the team in FGA. In the playoffs he was even 4th in FGA on his team

And none of their teams were actually that great on offence, except Kareem and he had an all-time PG in Oscar to support him. Regardless, unless you can play make like Jokic, the day of force-feeding your center are long-gone if you want to have a good offense in the modern NBA.

Wemby is probably better off focusing on his strengths than trying to imitate KD. He could be a modern day Bill Russell with better offense, that is still GOAT-stuff.


Giannis.


Giannis has a good case, what I recall from the data (the same stats OP used) though you can argue Brook Lopez was equally, if not more important for defence, and Jrue Holiday was also big contributor.

In any case, I dont think it makes sense to have modern NBA offense revolver around a big-man, unless he can play make like Jokic.
Image
spotted in Bologna
UglyBugBall
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,904
And1: 1,736
Joined: Sep 04, 2022
 

Re: Wembanyama, I'm concerned(Part 2) 

Post#29 » by UglyBugBall » Mon Jan 20, 2025 9:58 am

DCasey91 wrote:
UglyBugBall wrote:I don't think you can win a title with wemby as the number one option. He's like Pippen to me, an all time good second option. Well see, but I dont think he has the tools or skillset.


Giannis won one. Granted he had a perfectly built team around him and they all decided to play properly once they figured out they could manhandle their finals opponents.

Dude can put up 25 a game easily right now which is obviously ahead of where the other guy was.


Giannis plays to his strengths. If wemby develops a mid range, a post game or even a better screen and roll game I could see it happening, but as long as he keeps chucking like he's trae young I don't think he can be a number one offensive option on a title team. I don't need him posting up with his frame, but with his advantage he needs to get closer to the basket like Giannis does.
UglyBugBall
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,904
And1: 1,736
Joined: Sep 04, 2022
 

Re: Wembanyama, I'm concerned(Part 2) 

Post#30 » by UglyBugBall » Mon Jan 20, 2025 10:00 am

jmnvcavs wrote:
UglyBugBall wrote:I don't think you can win a title with wemby as the number one option. He's like Pippen to me, an all time good second option. Well see, but I dont think he has the tools or skillset.


How though? We’ve never seen a big man with the tools/skill set that Wemby has. When he gets stronger and stops shooting so many threes he will be unstoppable on the offensive end. Well he will be be unstoppable on both ends..



You're right If he does those things. Personally I'm skeptical he will. He seems dedicated to being an outside shooter. He's not bad at it, but he's not nearly good enough doing it to make this an effective play style as a number one title option. Imo anyway.
User avatar
bullsaficianado
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,496
And1: 804
Joined: Jun 17, 2007
Location: Illinois, USA
 

Re: Wembanyama, I'm concerned(Part 2) 

Post#31 » by bullsaficianado » Mon Jan 20, 2025 10:04 am

I watched a few Spurs games recently he looks really tired out there right now.
UglyBugBall
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,904
And1: 1,736
Joined: Sep 04, 2022
 

Re: Wembanyama, I'm concerned(Part 2) 

Post#32 » by UglyBugBall » Mon Jan 20, 2025 10:05 am

WestGOAT wrote:
UglyBugBall wrote:I don't think you can win a title with wemby as the number one option. He's like Pippen to me, an all time good second option. Well see, but I dont think he has the tools or skillset.


Yes you can, Wemby does not need to be first option on offense at all. As long if he impacts enough on defence then he is doing more than his part. All-time defensive impact + 2nd option on offensive is still historic stuff.

Throughout the history of the NBA I can only think of 3-4 players that were defensive anchors / all-time great defenders while being first option that won the title:
- Peak Duncan
- Peak Hakeem
- Peak Kareem
- Peak Wilt is interesting, he finally won a title in '67 but he was taking way less shots than earlier in his career and Hal Greer was leading the team in FGA. In the playoffs he was even 4th in FGA on his team

And none of their teams were actually that great on offence, except Kareem and he had an all-time PG in Oscar to support him. Regardless, unless you can play make like Jokic, the day of force-feeding your center are long-gone if you want to have a good offense in the modern NBA.

Wemby is probably better off focusing on his strengths than trying to imitate KD. He could be a modern day Bill Russell with better offense, that is still GOAT-stuff.


I mean I agree with you, I definitely think you can win a title with wemby obviously, I just don't think you can do it if he's your go to scorer. That might change, it's really early, but I'm 'concerned' about the kind of playstyle he's chosen to pursue. If he's going to be a Mount Rushmore player I think he has to be the number one scoring option. Right now I could see him being one of the best 3 defender of all time and the second scoring option on a title team which would still put him at a top 10ish potential.

If he focused on his strengths, which is mobility combined with incredible height and touch then he could be the best scorer on a team. But it seems pretty clear to me that he wants to be a combination of Steph Curry and KD, but hell never quite have the shooting touch to pull it off. It also removes his ability to impact the offensive glass or create an inside out passing presence.


Like I said to another guy, I don't necessarily want him posting up, but he should be screen and rolling, post and passing or taking the one dribble mid range pull up way more. Yeah I said midrange, at his height and mobility I think it would be devastating.
BlzMwt
Rookie
Posts: 1,129
And1: 1,206
Joined: Dec 12, 2013

Re: Wembanyama, I'm concerned(Part 2) 

Post#33 » by BlzMwt » Mon Jan 20, 2025 10:18 am

UglyBugBall wrote:
jmnvcavs wrote:
UglyBugBall wrote:I don't think you can win a title with wemby as the number one option. He's like Pippen to me, an all time good second option. Well see, but I dont think he has the tools or skillset.


How though? We’ve never seen a big man with the tools/skill set that Wemby has. When he gets stronger and stops shooting so many threes he will be unstoppable on the offensive end. Well he will be be unstoppable on both ends..



You're right If he does those things. Personally I'm skeptical he will. He seems dedicated to being an outside shooter. He's not bad at it, but he's not nearly good enough doing it to make this an effective play style as a number one title option. Imo anyway.


You seem pretty certain based on your posting that this dude who is halfway through his second season is already the player he will end up being.

Seems like you're jumping the gun a bit
UglyBugBall
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,904
And1: 1,736
Joined: Sep 04, 2022
 

Re: Wembanyama, I'm concerned(Part 2) 

Post#34 » by UglyBugBall » Mon Jan 20, 2025 10:22 am

BlzMwt wrote:
UglyBugBall wrote:
jmnvcavs wrote:
How though? We’ve never seen a big man with the tools/skill set that Wemby has. When he gets stronger and stops shooting so many threes he will be unstoppable on the offensive end. Well he will be be unstoppable on both ends..



You're right If he does those things. Personally I'm skeptical he will. He seems dedicated to being an outside shooter. He's not bad at it, but he's not nearly good enough doing it to make this an effective play style as a number one title option. Imo anyway.


You seem pretty certain based on your posting that this dude who is halfway through his second season is already the player he will end up being.

Seems like you're jumping the gun a bit


There's a decent chance I am. But I can't think of a lot of superstars that completely changed their playstyle after having spent a few years developing it in a completely different direction. I think it's more likely that Wemby remains a high volume outside shooter than he develops into mid or inside presence. I don't mean a Jokic or Embiid, because I don't think he'll ever have the frame for that, but at least like a super-sized and skilled Bam or something like that.
DCasey91
General Manager
Posts: 9,530
And1: 5,770
Joined: Dec 15, 2020
   

Re: Wembanyama, I'm concerned(Part 2) 

Post#35 » by DCasey91 » Mon Jan 20, 2025 11:36 am

UglyBugBall wrote:
DCasey91 wrote:
UglyBugBall wrote:I don't think you can win a title with wemby as the number one option. He's like Pippen to me, an all time good second option. Well see, but I dont think he has the tools or skillset.


Giannis won one. Granted he had a perfectly built team around him and they all decided to play properly once they figured out they could manhandle their finals opponents.

Dude can put up 25 a game easily right now which is obviously ahead of where the other guy was.


Giannis plays to his strengths. If wemby develops a mid range, a post game or even a better screen and roll game I could see it happening, but as long as he keeps chucking like he's trae young I don't think he can be a number one offensive option on a title team. I don't need him posting up with his frame, but with his advantage he needs to get closer to the basket like Giannis does.


He isn't chucking though 35 on high volume (9+) and 85+ ft

Those are better than solid indicators for a second year player.

Heck if those numbers alone translate in the post season he'd be already a handful without anything extra added on.

Whatever he'll be he`ll be, could he play closer? Sure but logically at his height you wouldn't want a crash and bash style of play anyway
Li WenWen is the GOAT
KG Leonard
Rookie
Posts: 1,027
And1: 688
Joined: Jun 24, 2018
   

Re: Wembanyama, I'm concerned(Part 2) 

Post#36 » by KG Leonard » Mon Jan 20, 2025 11:54 am

WestGOAT wrote:
Ayt wrote:
WestGOAT wrote:
Yes you can, Wemby does not need to be first option on offense at all. As long if he impacts enough on defence then he is doing more than his part. All-time defensive impact + 2nd option on offensive is still historic stuff.

Throughout the history of the NBA I can only think of 3-4 players that were defensive anchors / all-time great defenders while being first option that won the title:
- Peak Duncan
- Peak Hakeem
- Peak Kareem
- Peak Wilt is interesting, he finally won a title in '67 but he was taking way less shots than earlier in his career and Hal Greer was leading the team in FGA. In the playoffs he was even 4th in FGA on his team

And none of their teams were actually that great on offence, except Kareem and he had an all-time PG in Oscar to support him. Regardless, unless you can play make like Jokic, the day of force-feeding your center are long-gone if you want to have a good offense in the modern NBA.

Wemby is probably better off focusing on his strengths than trying to imitate KD. He could be a modern day Bill Russell with better offense, that is still GOAT-stuff.


Giannis.


Giannis has a good case, what I recall from the data (the same stats OP used) though you can argue Brook Lopez was equally, if not more important for defence, and Jrue Holiday was also big contributor.

In any case, I dont think it makes sense to have modern NBA offense revolver around a big-man, unless he can play make like Jokic.


Giannis is great help side defender, roamer and the block highlights doesn't mean he was the engine. Brook was the rock, their system was build on protecting the paint and letting their best defender own man to man D in Jrue Holiday. Under Bud they were a great team defence but was never built on Giannis first like he was their offensive gameplan. Every defensive advanced stats showed that. It is like saying SGA is Thunders best guard defender because he is nr.2 in steals and not all NBA defenders like Dort, Caruso.
User avatar
druggas
General Manager
Posts: 7,582
And1: 5,989
Joined: Dec 27, 2007

Re: Wembanyama, I'm concerned(Part 2) 

Post#37 » by druggas » Mon Jan 20, 2025 11:55 am

jmnvcavs wrote:
UglyBugBall wrote:I don't think you can win a title with wemby as the number one option. He's like Pippen to me, an all time good second option. Well see, but I dont think he has the tools or skillset.


How though? We’ve never seen a big man with the tools/skill set that Wemby has. When he gets stronger and stops shooting so many threes he will be unstoppable on the offensive end. Well he will be be unstoppable on both ends..

Ralph Sampson says "Hi".
JustBuzzin
RealGM
Posts: 16,112
And1: 13,674
Joined: Jun 10, 2023
 

Re: Wembanyama, I'm concerned(Part 2) 

Post#38 » by JustBuzzin » Mon Jan 20, 2025 12:14 pm

druggas wrote:
jmnvcavs wrote:
UglyBugBall wrote:I don't think you can win a title with wemby as the number one option. He's like Pippen to me, an all time good second option. Well see, but I dont think he has the tools or skillset.


How though? We’ve never seen a big man with the tools/skill set that Wemby has. When he gets stronger and stops shooting so many threes he will be unstoppable on the offensive end. Well he will be be unstoppable on both ends..

Ralph Sampson says "Hi".

Show me Ralph Sampson taking one legged 3's or crossing a defender with his ball handling. Ralph was nothing like Wemby. Being tall doesn't make you Wemby.

You can't compare Wemby to anyone because we never seen it. It's why he's the Alien. It's levels to this and Ralph ain't like him.

Cmon druggas don't be that guy. :lol:
User avatar
druggas
General Manager
Posts: 7,582
And1: 5,989
Joined: Dec 27, 2007

Re: Wembanyama, I'm concerned(Part 2) 

Post#39 » by druggas » Mon Jan 20, 2025 12:21 pm

JustBuzzin wrote:
druggas wrote:
jmnvcavs wrote:
How though? We’ve never seen a big man with the tools/skill set that Wemby has. When he gets stronger and stops shooting so many threes he will be unstoppable on the offensive end. Well he will be be unstoppable on both ends..

Ralph Sampson says "Hi".

Show me Ralph Sampson taking one legged 3's or crossing a defender with his ball handling. Ralph was nothing like Wemby. Being tall doesn't make you Wemby.

You can't compare Wemby to anyone because we never seen it. It's why he's the Alien. It's levels to this and Ralph ain't like him.

Cmon druggas don't be that guy. :lol:

You have no idea what you're spewing. Educate yourself.
JustBuzzin
RealGM
Posts: 16,112
And1: 13,674
Joined: Jun 10, 2023
 

Re: Wembanyama, I'm concerned(Part 2) 

Post#40 » by JustBuzzin » Mon Jan 20, 2025 12:30 pm

druggas wrote:
JustBuzzin wrote:
druggas wrote:Ralph Sampson says "Hi".

Show me Ralph Sampson taking one legged 3's or crossing a defender with his ball handling. Ralph was nothing like Wemby. Being tall doesn't make you Wemby.

You can't compare Wemby to anyone because we never seen it. It's why he's the Alien. It's levels to this and Ralph ain't like him.

Cmon druggas don't be that guy. :lol:

You have no idea what you're spewing. Educate yourself.
Love Sampson, but he didn't have the handles like Wemby. Wemby consistently takes people off the dribble. His pull up game is the best ever for a guy that size.

They had similarities sure, but Wemby is much more of a total package. Sorry Druggas but Wemby has no true comparison he's a 1 of 1. 8-)

Return to The General Board