Cleveland trade: Niang, 2-3 future seconds?
Cleveland receive: Drummond
Philadelphia trade: KJ martin, Drummond, 2026 OKC 1st
Philadelphia receive: 2-3 future 2nds from Cleveland
Detroit trade: fake 2nd
Detroit receive: Niang, KJ Martin (into room exception), 2026 OKC 1st
Why for Cleveland: duck tax, add C depth
Why for PHilly: duck tax in a lost season
Why for Detroit: get a future late 1st for its capspace
PHilly should be able to duck tax w/ the 10 man x 2 wks and prorated vet min rest of season stuff i think
Detroit - Philadelphia - Cleveland
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Detroit - Philadelphia - Cleveland
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,945
- And1: 13,879
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
-
Re: Detroit - Philadelphia - Cleveland
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,804
- And1: 35,886
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Detroit - Philadelphia - Cleveland
I don't think Drummond can come back to Cleveland after how he left. Even if everyone in the front office swallowed their pride, the risk to chemistry isn't worth it.
I really prefer Boucher as a target.
I really prefer Boucher as a target.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Detroit - Philadelphia - Cleveland
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 28,775
- And1: 9,688
- Joined: Jun 12, 2005
- Location: Philadelphia(ish)
-
Re: Detroit - Philadelphia - Cleveland
Josh Harris better hurry up on that new stadium because the fans would burn down the current one if they gave up a 1st to duck the tax.
Re: Detroit - Philadelphia - Cleveland
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,547
- And1: 1,993
- Joined: Mar 02, 2001
- Contact:
Re: Detroit - Philadelphia - Cleveland
As a Pistons fan, yes absolutely. KJs not fully guaranteed next season, so you’re basically getting a first for taking on Niangs contract
Cavs should never do this, I’m pretty sure they can duck the tax by trading a small contract. Plus I can’t see them taking Drummond back.
I feel like the Sixers could duck the tax by making separate deals and it would cost them less
Cavs should never do this, I’m pretty sure they can duck the tax by trading a small contract. Plus I can’t see them taking Drummond back.
I feel like the Sixers could duck the tax by making separate deals and it would cost them less
Re: Detroit - Philadelphia - Cleveland
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,110
- And1: 10,314
- Joined: May 01, 2010
Re: Detroit - Philadelphia - Cleveland
Godaddycurse wrote:Cleveland trade: Niang, 2-3 future seconds?
Cleveland receive: Drummond
Philadelphia trade: KJ martin, Drummond, 2026 OKC 1st
Philadelphia receive: 2-3 future 2nds from Cleveland
Detroit trade: fake 2nd
Detroit receive: Niang, KJ Martin (into room exception), 2026 OKC 1st
Why for Cleveland: duck tax, add C depth
Why for PHilly: duck tax in a lost season
Why for Detroit: get a future late 1st for its capspace
PHilly should be able to duck tax w/ the 10 man x 2 wks and prorated vet min rest of season stuff i think
If this the route they decide to go, I think the Sixers should be able to duck the tax without giving up a 1st.
Re: Detroit - Philadelphia - Cleveland
- Mr Peanut
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,306
- And1: 3,872
- Joined: Jan 29, 2012
- Location: New Zealand
-
Re: Detroit - Philadelphia - Cleveland
chrbal wrote:As a Pistons fan, yes absolutely. KJs not fully guaranteed next season, so you’re basically getting a first for taking on Niangs contract
Cavs should never do this, I’m pretty sure they can duck the tax by trading a small contract. Plus I can’t see them taking Drummond back.
I feel like the Sixers could duck the tax by making separate deals and it would cost them less
OKC's first next year will almost certainly be a very late first rounder (27-30 range). So the deal has to be analyzed with that knowledge.
Re: Detroit - Philadelphia - Cleveland
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,323
- And1: 2,289
- Joined: Nov 23, 2018
-
Re: Detroit - Philadelphia - Cleveland
Yeah, if we can use that space to get a real player who contributes, I'd prefer that. Also not super eager to add salary that will get in the way of bringing back Beasley.
Re: Detroit - Philadelphia - Cleveland
- ijspeelman
- Forum Mod - Cavs
- Posts: 2,648
- And1: 1,219
- Joined: Feb 17, 2022
- Contact:
-
Re: Detroit - Philadelphia - Cleveland
jbk1234 wrote:I don't think Drummond can come back to Cleveland after how he left. Even if everyone in the front office swallowed their pride, the risk to chemistry isn't worth it.
I really prefer Boucher as a target.
For a trade centered around Drummond for Cleveland, I surprisingly don't hate it?
We got a completely different version of Drummond when we previously had him and after the Lakers stint he looks to have accepted an actual role on a team. I guess your question of can the FO, the remaining players from that time (DG, Allen, Okoro, and Wade), and Drummond reconcile is fair, but nothing points to Drummond being a locker room cancer after Cleveland.
I'd think about this one lol. Drummond is a solid back-up center
Re: Detroit - Philadelphia - Cleveland
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,804
- And1: 35,886
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Detroit - Philadelphia - Cleveland
ijspeelman wrote:jbk1234 wrote:I don't think Drummond can come back to Cleveland after how he left. Even if everyone in the front office swallowed their pride, the risk to chemistry isn't worth it.
I really prefer Boucher as a target.
For a trade centered around Drummond for Cleveland, I surprisingly don't hate it?
We got a completely different version of Drummond when we previously had him and after the Lakers stint he looks to have accepted an actual role on a team. I guess your question of can the FO, the remaining players from that time (DG, Allen, Okoro, and Wade), and Drummond reconcile is fair, but nothing points to Drummond being a locker room cancer after Cleveland.
I'd think about this one lol. Drummond is a solid back-up center
You'd really have to implement a drop-coverage scheme with Drummond. In addition to our zone and man, that would be the third type of defense you'd be asking guys 1-11 on the roster to learn. Also, he can't play with Allen.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Detroit - Philadelphia - Cleveland
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 7,007
- And1: 8,494
- Joined: Feb 29, 2004
- Location: A retirement village near you
-
Re: Detroit - Philadelphia - Cleveland
jbk1234 wrote:ijspeelman wrote:jbk1234 wrote:I don't think Drummond can come back to Cleveland after how he left. Even if everyone in the front office swallowed their pride, the risk to chemistry isn't worth it.
I really prefer Boucher as a target.
For a trade centered around Drummond for Cleveland, I surprisingly don't hate it?
We got a completely different version of Drummond when we previously had him and after the Lakers stint he looks to have accepted an actual role on a team. I guess your question of can the FO, the remaining players from that time (DG, Allen, Okoro, and Wade), and Drummond reconcile is fair, but nothing points to Drummond being a locker room cancer after Cleveland.
I'd think about this one lol. Drummond is a solid back-up center
You'd really have to implement a drop-coverage scheme with Drummond. In addition to our zone and man, that would be the third type of defense you'd be asking guys 1-11 on the roster to learn. Also, he can't play with Allen.
Great point about the defensive scheme. Drummond is a great fit and backup for drop coverage, but can look bad in a zone and worse in man-to-man with switching. If a team isn't playing drop they should pass on Drummond
In a no-win argument, the first poster to Let It Go will at least retain some peace of mind
Return to Trades and Transactions