cmoss84 wrote:Chi out: Lavine, Ball
Chi in: Butler, Robinson, Burks
Mia out: Butler, Robinson, Ware, Jovic, Burks
Mia in: Lavine, Randle
MN out: Randle
MN in: Ball, Ware, Jovic
Why would Chicago want Butler?
Moderators: Domejandro, Calinks, Worm Guts
cmoss84 wrote:Chi out: Lavine, Ball
Chi in: Butler, Robinson, Burks
Mia out: Butler, Robinson, Ware, Jovic, Burks
Mia in: Lavine, Randle
MN out: Randle
MN in: Ball, Ware, Jovic
cmoss84 wrote:Chi out: Lavine, Ball
Chi in: Butler, Robinson, Burks
Mia out: Butler, Robinson, Ware, Jovic, Burks
Mia in: Lavine, Randle
MN out: Randle
MN in: Ball, Ware, Jovic
Note30 wrote:cmoss84 wrote:Chi out: Lavine, Ball
Chi in: Butler, Robinson, Burks
Mia out: Butler, Robinson, Ware, Jovic, Burks
Mia in: Lavine, Randle
MN out: Randle
MN in: Ball, Ware, Jovic
Why would Chicago want Butler?
Norseman79 wrote:To recap, a starting point guard, a good rebounding combo forward, a legit center.
shrink wrote:
In crunch time, Ant refuses to play through a PG (not Conley and certainly not Dillingham). I’m actually even surprised Mike has nine shots in the 28 crunch time games the Wolves have played.

minimus wrote:Norseman79 wrote:To recap, a starting point guard, a good rebounding combo forward, a legit center.
Lonzo Ball, Minott and Jalen Smith.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Klomp wrote:minimus wrote:Norseman79 wrote:To recap, a starting point guard, a good rebounding combo forward, a legit center.
Lonzo Ball, Minott and Jalen Smith.
Seriously, as far as circle peg in circle hole, I don't think we can get better than a Chicago offer of those two. Also worth pointing out, with NAW's shooting inconsistencies and Donte's injury, a guard like Lonzo might be more important than it was weeks ago.

cmoss84 wrote:Klomp wrote:minimus wrote:
Lonzo Ball, Minott and Jalen Smith.
Seriously, as far as circle peg in circle hole, I don't think we can get better than a Chicago offer of those two. Also worth pointing out, with NAW's shooting inconsistencies and Donte's injury, a guard like Lonzo might be more important than it was weeks ago.
I wonder which of the Jalens our FO would value more (and Detroit's)...Smith or Duren? This one works also.
Randle to Bulls
Smith to Det
Ball and Duren to MN
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
cmoss84 wrote:Klomp wrote:minimus wrote:
Lonzo Ball, Minott and Jalen Smith.
Seriously, as far as circle peg in circle hole, I don't think we can get better than a Chicago offer of those two. Also worth pointing out, with NAW's shooting inconsistencies and Donte's injury, a guard like Lonzo might be more important than it was weeks ago.
I wonder which of the Jalens our FO would value more (and Detroit's)...Smith or Duren? This one works also.
Randle to Bulls
Smith to Det
Ball and Duren to MN
cmoss84 wrote:I wonder which of the Jalens our FO would value more (and Detroit's)...Smith or Duren?
shrink wrote:
We better be winning over the next four years, because this trade makes it very hard to reacquire our picks and rebuild.
BlacJacMac wrote:shrink wrote:
We better be winning over the next four years, because this trade makes it very hard to reacquire our picks and rebuild.
What if some of those picks come back to us to help facilitate the Butler trade?
We've heard rumors that TC wants to get involved with it.
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves