ConSarnit wrote:CazOnReal wrote:Getting rid of IQ this early is a stupid suggestion, full stop
Why? If the offer is there I don't see a reason to not at least have the conversation. IQ projects to be what, the 16th best PG in the league? Maybe he reaches FVV level of 1 time replacement all-star. That's not an "untouchable" level player. I would not do it for the price(s) suggested in this thread but he's nowhere close to the level of player that is untouchable.
No one on this team should be untouchable for the right price. We could also find ourselves in place where we draft another PG this off-season. This team has too many question marks to rule out moving anyone (except maybe Barnes).
We need to drive his value higher before trading him. The same goes for Gradey or another young player we have. Barrett's value should theoretically be higher than when we traded for him. He should be a prime candidate to be traded and it would likely get us a distant 1st rounder.
After the age of 24 the chances of a first time all star occurence is lower than any top 5 pick odd. It's a terrible gamble for a front office to make.
The front office should be putting Poeltl and Barrett out on the market to see what they are valued at. If we can trade both for cap relief or 2 year expiring along with multiple picks we should be pulling that deal off. I would be open to taking distant picks, teams who have hoarded picks will want to move them down the future.





















