ImageImageImage

Post Game Thread – Why did the Celtics Lose to the Lakers (1/23)

Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman

What were the Main Issues tonight?

Mazzulla is a Stubborn (etc.) Coach?
15
27%
5 Games in 7 Nights?
13
24%
Cake Walk to the Championship, last year?
1
2%
Not Playing Bench Guys when they're Hot?
2
4%
Celtics Not Hungry, like last Season?
19
35%
Stars were too Spent and Lackluster?
2
4%
Lakers just Outplayed us?
3
5%
 
Total votes: 55

fallguy
General Manager
Posts: 7,824
And1: 12,657
Joined: Jun 12, 2009

Re: Post Game Thread – Why did the Celtics Lose to the Lakers (1/23) 

Post#81 » by fallguy » Sat Jan 25, 2025 12:22 am

playa-hater wrote:
Smart2Nesmith43 wrote:
fallguy wrote:
Aesthetically I hate our offense. But it's really about how easy this team is to game plan for now and our general inability to be tactically agile in-game. Smarter coaches than ours (Atkinson, in particular) could do a number on us in a 7-game series.

Yes there's no way Mazzulla can keep up tactically with a Spoelstra or a Carlisle in a playoff setting. No way :lol:


Spo already proved that head to head with seven undrafted players beating our full roster of all stars and lottery picks


Yeah, you can be a pro-Joe guy and still realize he's not in Spo's league.
Stop killing children in Gaza.
return2glory
RealGM
Posts: 17,010
And1: 10,715
Joined: Feb 24, 2005

Re: Post Game Thread – Why did the Celtics Lose to the Lakers (1/23) 

Post#82 » by return2glory » Sat Jan 25, 2025 12:32 am

Smart2Nesmith43 wrote:The NBA: wonders why the ratings are bad.
Also the NBA: schedules their marquee matchup with one team on their 5th game in 7 nights and the other one well rested.


I get that. But they reason ratings are bad is because the NBA has become boring. Run down the court, make a pass or two and throw up a 3. There is no more inside out game. It's a bunch of wanna be 3 point shooters. The league has average 3 point shooter taking 10 3s a game.

Also as far as one team playing 5th game in 7th nights and the other being well rested, the NBA wanted to make that a close game. They knew the Lakers are an average team. The NBA had no idea a championship with with all of it's main players coming back would become an average team the following season.
playa-hater
RealGM
Posts: 22,358
And1: 24,023
Joined: Aug 29, 2020
 

Re: Post Game Thread – Why did the Celtics Lose to the Lakers (1/23) 

Post#83 » by playa-hater » Sat Jan 25, 2025 12:38 am

fallguy wrote:
playa-hater wrote:
Smart2Nesmith43 wrote:Yes there's no way Mazzulla can keep up tactically with a Spoelstra or a Carlisle in a playoff setting. No way :lol:


Spo already proved that head to head with seven undrafted players beating our full roster of all stars and lottery picks


Yeah, you can be a pro-Joe guy and still realize he's not in Spo's league.


Some people can..
2 things need to go.. my lack of spell check and Joe.. :nod:
return2glory
RealGM
Posts: 17,010
And1: 10,715
Joined: Feb 24, 2005

Re: Post Game Thread – Why did the Celtics Lose to the Lakers (1/23) 

Post#84 » by return2glory » Sat Jan 25, 2025 12:49 am

ThePigeon wrote:
tfribs45 wrote:This group is getting burned out. Need a boost to the roster, Brad and CO. need to be looking for deals before the deadline. Nothing crazy to shake up our top 5 but everyone else should be available. What exactly has Hauser done lately? Our G league bench needs a boost most of our bench PP included in the negatives last night. Time to trim some fat. I'd give Memphis some pennies on the dollar and get Mahcuss Smahtttt back here! Our defense has been pathetic! Pat Bev could even help this unit, something needs to change, at least a slight tweak!


This group needs Joe to stop playing double bigs and start playing some high energy players like Walsh and Springer before any trade
You can also add someone via free agency


It's hard watching the double big because Al has lost a step and KP was out of game shape and Kornet, while improved is too slow against smaller lineups. None of these guys moves well laterally. Al used to and is still solid compared to KP and Korrnet.

Also is it only me, but I just don't like seeing Pritchard, Hauser and Kornet all playing at the same time. I like these guys, but not all at once on the floor. They are too one dimensional.

I want to see a bench rotation of:

Al, JT, Springer, Walsh and and Hauser. JT or JB should be in. We need defense and energy, and Springer and Walsh can bring that.
return2glory
RealGM
Posts: 17,010
And1: 10,715
Joined: Feb 24, 2005

Re: Post Game Thread – Why did the Celtics Lose to the Lakers (1/23) 

Post#85 » by return2glory » Sat Jan 25, 2025 1:06 am

bisme37 wrote:This will probably be unpopular but I didn't think the issue was effort.

Energy, sure. But I saw tired legs and sloppy play and short shots more so than guys not trying. 5th game in 7 nights and coming off OT the night before. Other team all fired up to beat us, like usual but it's the Lakers so even more than usual.

Bad night and I'm mad about it and everything but not trying to not lose my mind over here haha. Joe probably should have gone more to the bench in this one.


I say terrible coaching. Here is why. 3 of our top 7 (KP, Jrue and Al) guys rested the game before.
Brown was playing with a bad ankle and was tired. JT, White and Pritchard were all tired.

So as the coach or coaches, why not find Tatum some extra rest at the end of quarters and other ways. Why not cut his minutes down about 7-10 minutes for that game? Why not use Springer about 12 minutes in the first half, instead of 0 minutes. Springer could have given Brown and White the rest they needed. Why not play Walsh about 10 minutes in the first half, instead of not playing him at all in that half? Why not play Pritchard less in the game, since Joe sees Pritchard is struggling? He was 1-11 on his first 12 shots.
Why not play Queta or Tillman instead of luke, who played 30 minutes the night before (only had 2 points and 2 rebounds in that game)?

This is something the coaching staff knows and should prepare before the game and have a game plan, but instead it's the same ole rotations.

Joe has been pretty bad at making adjustments to the rotation. The Springer thing against the Clippers was the first time we tried something new, and it was only because we were sitting out Jrue. If the Lakers game was close, Springer would have gotten 0 minutes of playing time. He played 8 minutes only after we got blown out.
User avatar
Fierce1
RealGM
Posts: 19,061
And1: 16,370
Joined: Jan 31, 2021
   

Re: Post Game Thread – Why did the Celtics Lose to the Lakers (1/23) 

Post#86 » by Fierce1 » Sat Jan 25, 2025 1:11 am

GrandTheftRondo wrote:
Fierce1 wrote:
GrandTheftRondo wrote:I’ve had a gut full of watching this team jack contested threes and pretending that’s good basketball.

Last season it was not a problem because the Cs had 4 players shooting 40% from 3.

This season, only PP is shooting 40% from 3.

JB and JT are having career lows in 3pt shooting % this season.

We have no choice but to endure the next 3 months.

Hopefully the playoffs will be better.

It’s about the shot quality.

They have been shooting some awful contested 3s. No ball movement last night

True.

Quality of shots is from lack of discipline on offense.

Cavs basically have the same group of players from last season, but this season they're different because they rarely force shots.

Celtics need to have more discipline on offense.

JB sees 2 or 3 defenders in front of him, he still tries to go through them.
User avatar
Fierce1
RealGM
Posts: 19,061
And1: 16,370
Joined: Jan 31, 2021
   

Re: Post Game Thread – Why did the Celtics Lose to the Lakers (1/23) 

Post#87 » by Fierce1 » Sat Jan 25, 2025 1:16 am

Regarding the coaching, whether we like or dislike Joe, as long as the players want Joe, nothing will change.

We had one of the best coaches in Brad Stevens.

But what did the players say in 2021?

Even Tatum himself said they needed a new voice.

No matter how genius the coach, if the players don't like him, he's gone!

Milwaukee went from a .600 team to a .500 team when they fired Adrian Griffin and hired Doc.

Politics is involved in NBA coaching.
Darthlukey
Forum Mod - Celtics
Forum Mod - Celtics
Posts: 5,222
And1: 3,655
Joined: Jan 16, 2013
         

Re: Post Game Thread – Why did the Celtics Lose to the Lakers (1/23) 

Post#88 » by Darthlukey » Sat Jan 25, 2025 1:18 am

Fierce1 wrote:
GrandTheftRondo wrote:
Fierce1 wrote:Last season it was not a problem because the Cs had 4 players shooting 40% from 3.

This season, only PP is shooting 40% from 3.

JB and JT are having career lows in 3pt shooting % this season.

We have no choice but to endure the next 3 months.

Hopefully the playoffs will be better.

It’s about the shot quality.

They have been shooting some awful contested 3s. No ball movement last night

True.

Quality of shots is from lack of discipline on offense.

Cavs basically have the same group of players from last season, but this season they're different because they rarely force shots.

Celtics need to have more discipline on offense.

JB sees 2 or 3 defenders in front of him, he still tries to go through them.

JB winning FMVP feels the same as Westbrook winning MVP years ago, it seems to have validated their respective playing styles which are very flawed. JB, in my opinion, isn't a great creator or facilitator but he is a helluva finisher. Winning FMVP potentially means he keeps doing what he has always done, rather than recognising his limitations or improving upon them.
Not meaning to dump on JB so much, he still helped get us a title!
User avatar
Fierce1
RealGM
Posts: 19,061
And1: 16,370
Joined: Jan 31, 2021
   

Re: Post Game Thread – Why did the Celtics Lose to the Lakers (1/23) 

Post#89 » by Fierce1 » Sat Jan 25, 2025 1:22 am

Darthlukey wrote:
Fierce1 wrote:
GrandTheftRondo wrote:It’s about the shot quality.

They have been shooting some awful contested 3s. No ball movement last night

True.

Quality of shots is from lack of discipline on offense.

Cavs basically have the same group of players from last season, but this season they're different because they rarely force shots.

Celtics need to have more discipline on offense.

JB sees 2 or 3 defenders in front of him, he still tries to go through them.

JB winning FMVP feels the same as Westbrook winning MVP years ago, it seems to have validated their respective playing styles which are very flawed. JB, in my opinion, isn't a great creator or facilitator but he is a helluva finisher. Winning FMVP potentially means he keeps doing what he has always done, rather than recognising his limitations or improving upon them.
Not meaning to dump on JB so much, he still helped get us a title!

100%

You could not have said it any better.

Well, right now we're at the mercy of JB.

If JB doesn't improve in the next 3 months, it will be a frustrating playoffs as well.

Reason why JB won Finals MVP is because he played within the system.
JB played great defense on Luka and he let the game come to him.
This season, it seems like JB is trying to prove a point.
User avatar
Celts17Pride
RealGM
Posts: 68,302
And1: 69,910
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Re: Post Game Thread – Why did the Celtics Lose to the Lakers (1/23) 

Post#90 » by Celts17Pride » Sat Jan 25, 2025 3:38 am

Fierce1 wrote:
Darthlukey wrote:
Fierce1 wrote:True.

Quality of shots is from lack of discipline on offense.

Cavs basically have the same group of players from last season, but this season they're different because they rarely force shots.

Celtics need to have more discipline on offense.

JB sees 2 or 3 defenders in front of him, he still tries to go through them.

JB winning FMVP feels the same as Westbrook winning MVP years ago, it seems to have validated their respective playing styles which are very flawed. JB, in my opinion, isn't a great creator or facilitator but he is a helluva finisher. Winning FMVP potentially means he keeps doing what he has always done, rather than recognising his limitations or improving upon them.
Not meaning to dump on JB so much, he still helped get us a title!

100%

You could not have said it any better.

Well, right now we're at the mercy of JB.

If JB doesn't improve in the next 3 months, it will be a frustrating playoffs as well.

Reason why JB won Finals MVP is because he played within the system.
JB played great defense on Luka and he let the game come to him.
This season, it seems like JB is trying to prove a point.

You have a Jaylen Brown complex. Brown hasn't been playing well but neither has Tatum, White, Holiday, Horford,Hauser etc.
User avatar
Fierce1
RealGM
Posts: 19,061
And1: 16,370
Joined: Jan 31, 2021
   

Re: Post Game Thread – Why did the Celtics Lose to the Lakers (1/23) 

Post#91 » by Fierce1 » Sat Jan 25, 2025 4:41 am

Celts17Pride wrote:
Fierce1 wrote:
Darthlukey wrote:JB winning FMVP feels the same as Westbrook winning MVP years ago, it seems to have validated their respective playing styles which are very flawed. JB, in my opinion, isn't a great creator or facilitator but he is a helluva finisher. Winning FMVP potentially means he keeps doing what he has always done, rather than recognising his limitations or improving upon them.
Not meaning to dump on JB so much, he still helped get us a title!

100%

You could not have said it any better.

Well, right now we're at the mercy of JB.

If JB doesn't improve in the next 3 months, it will be a frustrating playoffs as well.

Reason why JB won Finals MVP is because he played within the system.
JB played great defense on Luka and he let the game come to him.
This season, it seems like JB is trying to prove a point.

You have a Jaylen Brown complex. Brown hasn't been playing well but neither has Tatum, White, Holiday, Horford,Hauser etc.

Tatum, White, Holiday, Horford, Hauser, etc. are not trying to go through 2 or 3 defenders on a regular basis.

Those guys are missing shots.
JB is just not making good decisions.

The Clippers game is a perfect example.
JB had 25 pts in that game.
But he made 3 crucial errors that could have cost the Celtics the game.
Smart2Nesmith43
Starter
Posts: 2,354
And1: 6,566
Joined: Nov 06, 2021
 

Re: Post Game Thread – Why did the Celtics Lose to the Lakers (1/23) 

Post#92 » by Smart2Nesmith43 » Sat Jan 25, 2025 4:42 pm

redslastlaugh wrote:Part of sports is rising to the occasion and playing great in the moment.
In the 79 Final Four, Larry Bird was 16/19 from the field to beat DePaul and go to the Final
16/19 is 84% from the field

Nobody said Bird rode his unbelievably hot shooting, or that variance determined the outcome. People just said that Bird played a great game.

Smart2Nesmith43 wrote:
playa-hater wrote:
Spo already proved that head to head with seven undrafted players beating our full roster of all stars and lottery picks

2022-2023 Heat wide open three pointers attempts / percentage
Regular season 13.7 / 37.1
First round 10.4 / 42.3
Second round 14.2 / 37.6
Conference finals 9.6 / 58.2
Finals 10.0 / 38.0
Embarassing they lost 3 games to the Celtics despite riding the hottest shooting streak of all time.

So what you are saying is that Miami's players rose to the moment. Not really sure how that's an indictement of Mazzulla. I wonder in what magical world we live in where the Heat players decided to knock down open shots just in the conference finals at a rate that not even Steph Curry could sustain but were very average at every other point in the year., but it has nothing to do with variance, just being clutch. Of course, being the clutch gods that they are they returned to shooting completely average once they got to play in the biggest games of the season. You know like clutch players do.

In the real world, Mazzulla keeps cranking out 55+ wins season like it's nothing with top 5 units on both sides of the ball, goes deep into the playoffs every year, there's barely ever a peep from a player being unhappy about how things are going and he is willing to work on his weaknesses. Is he perfect ? No but I dare you to find somebody available that's better. Firing the coach in and of itself accomplishes nothing. Ask the Bucks fans that demanded Budenholzer's head without a succession plan in place how it's going now.

If you somehow feel like Mazzulla isn't getting the most out of this roster and the Celtics should dominate like the KD Warriors or the Jordan Bulls, I invite you to take another look at those rosters and then what Joe has to work with. Which is a team whose best player isn't close to being the best in the world and the second best player is like a border line all star.

I also love the disconnect about how it's completely expected from a rookie player to improve over the course of his career but a coach is a finished product the moment he sits on an NBA bench. Because your precious Spo looked far more lost in the beginning, including during the 2011 finals, than Mazzulla ever did. I think he turned out fine and so do you clearly.
playa-hater
RealGM
Posts: 22,358
And1: 24,023
Joined: Aug 29, 2020
 

Re: Post Game Thread – Why did the Celtics Lose to the Lakers (1/23) 

Post#93 » by playa-hater » Sat Jan 25, 2025 4:51 pm

Darthlukey wrote:JB winning FMVP feels the same as Westbrook winning MVP years ago, it seems to have validated their respective playing styles which are very flawed. JB, in my opinion, isn't a great creator or facilitator but he is a helluva finisher. Winning FMVP potentially means he keeps doing what he has always done, rather than recognising his limitations or improving upon them.
Not meaning to dump on JB so much, he still helped get us a title!


Excellent point/post. I wonder if JB stans are willing to admit this? JB at times has excellent qualities we need. A big Jolt in scoring. Like that he actually goes and posts up often. More than KP and Tatum, who I actually think would make themselves and Boston far better. But JB has some HUGE drawbacks. And much of it was added to by Joe. Namely his initiating the offense when he is so much better off the ball. He often plays with 2 PGs White and Jrue who are relegated to watching JB "do his thing". And like Westbrook, as you say, is not really always conducive to winning BB.
2 things need to go.. my lack of spell check and Joe.. :nod:
User avatar
Celts17Pride
RealGM
Posts: 68,302
And1: 69,910
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Re: Post Game Thread – Why did the Celtics Lose to the Lakers (1/23) 

Post#94 » by Celts17Pride » Sat Jan 25, 2025 5:59 pm

playa-hater wrote:
Darthlukey wrote:JB winning FMVP feels the same as Westbrook winning MVP years ago, it seems to have validated their respective playing styles which are very flawed. JB, in my opinion, isn't a great creator or facilitator but he is a helluva finisher. Winning FMVP potentially means he keeps doing what he has always done, rather than recognising his limitations or improving upon them.
Not meaning to dump on JB so much, he still helped get us a title!


Excellent point/post. I wonder if JB stans are willing to admit this? JB at times has excellent qualities we need. A big Jolt in scoring. Like that he actually goes and posts up often. More than KP and Tatum, who I actually think would make themselves and Boston far better. But JB has some HUGE drawbacks. And much of it was added to by Joe. Namely his initiating the offense when he is so much better off the ball. He often plays with 2 PGs White and Jrue who are relegated to watching JB "do his thing". And like Westbrook, as you say, is not really always conducive to winning BB.

So White and Jrue suck because of Jaylen Brown. Got it. Jaylen Brown is averaging the most assists in his career and it would be a lot more if White, Holiday, Hauser, Horford could hit a shot. Both Tatum and Brown go into ISO mode because their teammates are not performing. Not saying it's right but it's what always happens. Reggie Miller said on the broadcast the other night that Jayson Tatum is hitting 18% from pull up three's the last 5-6 games. Once the Celtics players start hitting shots everything will be fine.

Right now the Celtics are not hitting shots and not defending. Adds up to very uneven play.

The 2nd quarter the other night Tatum/Hauser/Pritchard go 1 for 9 from three point range. This forum: That's Jaylen Brown's fault.
User avatar
Celts17Pride
RealGM
Posts: 68,302
And1: 69,910
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Re: Post Game Thread – Why did the Celtics Lose to the Lakers (1/23) 

Post#95 » by Celts17Pride » Sat Jan 25, 2025 6:23 pm

Fierce1 wrote:
Celts17Pride wrote:
Fierce1 wrote:100%

You could not have said it any better.

Well, right now we're at the mercy of JB.

If JB doesn't improve in the next 3 months, it will be a frustrating playoffs as well.

Reason why JB won Finals MVP is because he played within the system.
JB played great defense on Luka and he let the game come to him.
This season, it seems like JB is trying to prove a point.

You have a Jaylen Brown complex. Brown hasn't been playing well but neither has Tatum, White, Holiday, Horford,Hauser etc.

Tatum, White, Holiday, Horford, Hauser, etc. are not trying to go through 2 or 3 defenders on a regular basis.

Those guys are missing shots.
JB is just not making good decisions.

The Clippers game is a perfect example.
JB had 25 pts in that game.
But he made 3 crucial errors that could have cost the Celtics the game.

Jaylen Brown had a very nice game 8 for 15 shooting, 25 points, 6 assists, 3 steals and a very ugly last 3 minutes. No question. Brown and Tatum each had 5 turnovers. Brown's were magnified because they came in the last 3 minutes.
redslastlaugh
Analyst
Posts: 3,241
And1: 4,015
Joined: Aug 13, 2011
 

Re: Post Game Thread – Why did the Celtics Lose to the Lakers (1/23) 

Post#96 » by redslastlaugh » Sat Jan 25, 2025 8:16 pm

Okay, these are fair points overall. I’m not a Joe Hater, overall he’s done a great job.

He became head coach after Will Hardy took the Utah job and Udoka got fired, so he took over because of that crazy circumstance. He jumped like four other coaches & got a team that just went to the Finals. That was pretty crazy and no 32 year old would have been 100% ready for that moment. And Joe did many good things that first year, in particular identifying Hauser and Derrick as better than Grant & Marcus, which has been proven correct.

He clearly has spent time thinking about a winning basketball system and instituted a framework around four main elements

1. Player positioning
2. 3PT attempt rate
3. Turnover margin
4. OREB margin

The system broadly works, like Bud’s 5-Out Hawks and D’Antonio Suns. Unlike those two coaches, the system produced a title. But the downside is his system deprecates passing, cutting, 2PTA and generally moving his pieces to gain an advantage on possession by possession basis.

What I mean is if you have 100 possessions and you play prevent D, shoot more 3’s while winning turnovers and offensive rebounds, you’re hoping to be up 12 or 20 coming into the last 4 or 5 minutes. But if you’re not, your system doesn’t give you any advantages in a possession game because you are not manipulating the D through ball and player movement to get high percentage 2s. And 3 being worth more 2, the math only works if the sample size is large enough.

If you have a tie game with 10 seconds left, a 90% dunk is way more valuable that a 40% three, even though threes are worth more than twos and yada yada … the math needs a large sample to pay out and in a tight game, under Joe’s system we’re frequently just taking bad shots.

So yea, Joe’s a good leader, he conducts himself with integrity, and he won a title, but sometimes the way he wants us to play is very cold, mechanical and without grace & teamwork, the “beautiful game” so to speak and that coldness sometimes zaps the joy out of the fandom experience. And, just me personally, I wish we’d go back to last years shot profile.

But overall yea, it’s not like we’d be better off to fire Joe and just hire someone else

Smart2Nesmith43 wrote:
redslastlaugh wrote:Part of sports is rising to the occasion and playing great in the moment.
In the 79 Final Four, Larry Bird was 16/19 from the field to beat DePaul and go to the Final
16/19 is 84% from the field

Nobody said Bird rode his unbelievably hot shooting, or that variance determined the outcome. People just said that Bird played a great game.

Smart2Nesmith43 wrote:2022-2023 Heat wide open three pointers attempts / percentage
Regular season 13.7 / 37.1
First round 10.4 / 42.3
Second round 14.2 / 37.6
Conference finals 9.6 / 58.2
Finals 10.0 / 38.0
Embarassing they lost 3 games to the Celtics despite riding the hottest shooting streak of all time.

So what you are saying is that Miami's players rose to the moment. Not really sure how that's an indictement of Mazzulla. I wonder in what magical world we live in where the Heat players decided to knock down open shots just in the conference finals at a rate that not even Steph Curry could sustain but were very average at every other point in the year., but it has nothing to do with variance, just being clutch. Of course, being the clutch gods that they are they returned to shooting completely average once they got to play in the biggest games of the season. You know like clutch players do.

In the real world, Mazzulla keeps cranking out 55+ wins season like it's nothing with top 5 units on both sides of the ball, goes deep into the playoffs every year, there's barely ever a peep from a player being unhappy about how things are going and he is willing to work on his weaknesses. Is he perfect ? No but I dare you to find somebody available that's better. Firing the coach in and of itself accomplishes nothing. Ask the Bucks fans that demanded Budenholzer's head without a succession plan in place how it's going now.

If you somehow feel like Mazzulla isn't getting the most out of this roster and the Celtics should dominate like the KD Warriors or the Jordan Bulls, I invite you to take another look at those rosters and then what Joe has to work with. Which is a team whose best player isn't close to being the best in the world and the second best player is like a border line all star.

I also love the disconnect about how it's completely expected from a rookie player to improve over the course of his career but a coach is a finished product the moment he sits on an NBA bench. Because your precious Spo looked far more lost in the beginning, including during the 2011 finals, than Mazzulla ever did. I think he turned out fine and so do you clearly.
tfribs45
Head Coach
Posts: 6,413
And1: 5,829
Joined: Jul 19, 2013
     

Re: Post Game Thread – Why did the Celtics Lose to the Lakers (1/23) 

Post#97 » by tfribs45 » Sun Jan 26, 2025 12:21 am

JB and D White putting in Work!
playa-hater
RealGM
Posts: 22,358
And1: 24,023
Joined: Aug 29, 2020
 

Re: Post Game Thread – Why did the Celtics Lose to the Lakers (1/23) 

Post#98 » by playa-hater » Sun Jan 26, 2025 6:13 am

Celts17Pride wrote:
playa-hater wrote:
Darthlukey wrote:JB winning FMVP feels the same as Westbrook winning MVP years ago, it seems to have validated their respective playing styles which are very flawed. JB, in my opinion, isn't a great creator or facilitator but he is a helluva finisher. Winning FMVP potentially means he keeps doing what he has always done, rather than recognising his limitations or improving upon them.
Not meaning to dump on JB so much, he still helped get us a title!


Excellent point/post. I wonder if JB stans are willing to admit this? JB at times has excellent qualities we need. A big Jolt in scoring. Like that he actually goes and posts up often. More than KP and Tatum, who I actually think would make themselves and Boston far better. But JB has some HUGE drawbacks. And much of it was added to by Joe. Namely his initiating the offense when he is so much better off the ball. He often plays with 2 PGs White and Jrue who are relegated to watching JB "do his thing". And like Westbrook, as you say, is not really always conducive to winning BB.

So White and Jrue suck because of Jaylen Brown. Got it. Jaylen Brown is averaging the most assists in his career and it would be a lot more if White, Holiday, Hauser, Horford could hit a shot. Both Tatum and Brown go into ISO mode because their teammates are not performing. Not saying it's right but it's what always happens. Reggie Miller said on the broadcast the other night that Jayson Tatum is hitting 18% from pull up three's the last 5-6 games. Once the Celtics players start hitting shots everything will be fine.

Right now the Celtics are not hitting shots and not defending. Adds up to very uneven play.

The 2nd quarter the other night Tatum/Hauser/Pritchard go 1 for 9 from three point range. This forum: That's Jaylen Brown's fault.


This Forum?? Maybe... But me, it's mostly Joe's fault.

But I do stand on what I said. Brown is better at scoring, posting up and finishing vs overdribbling/initiating. Jrue and White are more effective as creators than just standing around launching shots.
2 things need to go.. my lack of spell check and Joe.. :nod:

Return to Boston Celtics