Interfranchise Animosity and Trades

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

User avatar
SkyHook
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,061
And1: 3,378
Joined: Jun 24, 2002
 

Interfranchise Animosity and Trades 

Post#1 » by SkyHook » Sun Jan 26, 2025 2:52 am

Are there FOs which absolutely refuse to trade with another team? I've heard that Lakers and Blazers won't deal with each other. There seems to be ample enmity between Ainge and Riley that would make transactions unlikely. (Have they ever made a trade?)

Anyone else?
"When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move, your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth, and tell the whole world...

... NO, YOU MOVE."
Myth
RealGM
Posts: 11,786
And1: 10,442
Joined: Oct 01, 2008
   

Re: Interfranchise Animosity and Trades 

Post#2 » by Myth » Sun Jan 26, 2025 3:03 am

Blazers may have 3 right now:

Blazers and Lakers haven’t traded in over 40 years, and the trades before that were about as minor as can be. That said, the fans are warming up to the idea, and there were rumored negotiations between the franchises this past summer.

Blazers and Heat had animosity about the Lillard situation. I again hope this doesn’t stop a trade if one makes sense.

Blazers and Warriors had issues related to Gary Payton II, in which the Warriors complained to the league office and accused Portland of lying about medical stuff. Some assume this could be a barrier between current administrations.
chrbal
RealGM
Posts: 21,547
And1: 1,993
Joined: Mar 02, 2001
Contact:

Re: Interfranchise Animosity and Trades 

Post#3 » by chrbal » Sun Jan 26, 2025 3:05 am

https://www.basketball-reference.com/friv/trades.fcgi

Don’t know the answer, but i stumbled across this trying to figure out the answer
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,308
And1: 9,869
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: Interfranchise Animosity and Trades 

Post#4 » by penbeast0 » Sun Jan 26, 2025 3:09 am

chrbal wrote:https://www.basketball-reference.com/friv/trades.fcgi

Don’t know the answer, but i stumbled across this trying to figure out the answer


That is nice!
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
ejftw
RealGM
Posts: 11,609
And1: 5,661
Joined: Nov 30, 2008
Contact:
         

Re: Interfranchise Animosity and Trades 

Post#5 » by ejftw » Sun Jan 26, 2025 3:11 am

Clippers have never been involved in a deal with San Ant, interesting. Multiple times with the Lakers, most recently the Bones deal, which was indirect.

Only once directly in LA (Muscala for Zu and Beasley). Once in San Diego (Nater, Scott for Eddie Jordan, Nixon and a 2nd that was Hornacek, which they dealt for Ricky **** Pierce)
jscott
Veteran
Posts: 2,953
And1: 1,203
Joined: Oct 14, 2004
 

Re: Interfranchise Animosity and Trades 

Post#6 » by jscott » Sun Jan 26, 2025 3:12 am

Any word on why Blazers and Lakers have heat?
Myth
RealGM
Posts: 11,786
And1: 10,442
Joined: Oct 01, 2008
   

Re: Interfranchise Animosity and Trades 

Post#7 » by Myth » Sun Jan 26, 2025 3:16 am

ejftw wrote:Clippers have never been involved in a deal with San Ant, interesting. Multiple times with the Lakers, most recently the Bones deal, which was indirect.

Only once directly in LA (Muscala for Zu and Beasley). Once in San Diego (Nater, Scott for Eddie Jordan, Nixon and a 2nd that was Hornacek, which they dealt for Ricky **** Pierce)

There’s a few teams there who have never traded. Hawks have a few really close buddies I see.
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,544
And1: 13,900
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: Interfranchise Animosity and Trades 

Post#8 » by JRoy » Sun Jan 26, 2025 3:19 am

Myth wrote:Blazers may have 3 right now:

Blazers and Lakers haven’t traded in over 40 years, and the trades before that were about as minor as can be. That said, the fans are warming up to the idea, and there were rumored negotiations between the franchises this past summer.

Blazers and Heat had animosity about the Lillard situation. I again hope this doesn’t stop a trade if one makes sense.

Blazers and Warriors had issues related to Gary Payton II, in which the Warriors complained to the league office and accused Portland of lying about medical stuff. Some assume this could be a barrier between current administrations.



Not all fans are warming up to that idea.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
Myth
RealGM
Posts: 11,786
And1: 10,442
Joined: Oct 01, 2008
   

Re: Interfranchise Animosity and Trades 

Post#9 » by Myth » Sun Jan 26, 2025 3:21 am

jscott wrote:Any word on why Blazers and Lakers have heat?

Just old school rivalry, mostly fueled by Blazers fans hating the Lakers. Any potential trade with the Lakers the team also has to weigh PR issues with the fans, particularly if it is a fan favorite going to the C Lakers and making them better. There would have been a problematic amount of Blazers fans upset if they traded Lillard to the Lakers. I think part of the recent relaxed stance is the Blazers fans are really hoping to get rid of some guys (like Grant who was rumored to be in discussion to be traded to LAL) while not believing it pushes the Lakers into championship territory.
Myth
RealGM
Posts: 11,786
And1: 10,442
Joined: Oct 01, 2008
   

Re: Interfranchise Animosity and Trades 

Post#10 » by Myth » Sun Jan 26, 2025 3:23 am

JRoy wrote:
Myth wrote:Blazers may have 3 right now:

Blazers and Lakers haven’t traded in over 40 years, and the trades before that were about as minor as can be. That said, the fans are warming up to the idea, and there were rumored negotiations between the franchises this past summer.

Blazers and Heat had animosity about the Lillard situation. I again hope this doesn’t stop a trade if one makes sense.

Blazers and Warriors had issues related to Gary Payton II, in which the Warriors complained to the league office and accused Portland of lying about medical stuff. Some assume this could be a barrier between current administrations.



Not all fans are warming up to that idea.

Not all, but it is the first large shift I’ve ever seen in the overall online Blazers community. Many are genuinely upset that Cronin was too firm in his demands in a possible Jerami to Lakers trade.
nykballa2k4
RealGM
Posts: 31,063
And1: 7,434
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Location: Kurt Rhombus is managing the defense...
       

Re: Interfranchise Animosity and Trades 

Post#11 » by nykballa2k4 » Sun Jan 26, 2025 3:26 am

SkyHook wrote:Are there FOs which absolutely refuse to trade with another team? I've heard that Lakers and Blazers won't deal with each other. There seems to be ample enmity between Ainge and Riley that would make transactions unlikely. (Have they ever made a trade?)

Anyone else?


The only trade ever between Heat and Knicks was Walter McCarty (pick) for Pat Riley (coach).
Numbers don't lie, people who use them do
Stand up to all hate
Stand up to Jewish hate
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,544
And1: 13,900
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: Interfranchise Animosity and Trades 

Post#12 » by JRoy » Sun Jan 26, 2025 3:28 am

jscott wrote:Any word on why Blazers and Lakers have heat?


When I was growing up in St Johns, getting screwed was called “getting Lakered”.

I don’t know the origin of the phrase but I remember it clearly.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
Devilanche
General Manager
Posts: 7,744
And1: 2,442
Joined: Dec 22, 2010

Re: Interfranchise Animosity and Trades 

Post#13 » by Devilanche » Sun Jan 26, 2025 3:36 am

OKC . If you are willing put one pick into the trade , Presti is definitely willing to answer the call.
MoneyTalks41890 wrote:No I’m myopic and shortsighted and I want my pile of draft picks.


meekrab wrote:Nothing Jerry Rein$dorf loves more than a visit from Cash Considerations.
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,544
And1: 13,900
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: Interfranchise Animosity and Trades 

Post#14 » by JRoy » Sun Jan 26, 2025 3:39 am

Myth wrote:
jscott wrote:Any word on why Blazers and Lakers have heat?

Just old school rivalry, mostly fueled by Blazers fans hating the Lakers. Any potential trade with the Lakers the team also has to weigh PR issues with the fans, particularly if it is a fan favorite going to the C Lakers and making them better. There would have been a problematic amount of Blazers fans upset if they traded Lillard to the Lakers. I think part of the recent relaxed stance is the Blazers fans are really hoping to get rid of some guys (like Grant who was rumored to be in discussion to be traded to LAL) while not believing it pushes the Lakers into championship territory.


It’s pretty much one sided; the pimply freshman who envies the senior with the car and the girls. The senior barely notices the freshman.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
SNPA
General Manager
Posts: 9,024
And1: 8,372
Joined: Apr 15, 2020

Re: Interfranchise Animosity and Trades 

Post#15 » by SNPA » Sun Jan 26, 2025 5:59 am

Myth wrote:
jscott wrote:Any word on why Blazers and Lakers have heat?

Just old school rivalry, mostly fueled by Blazers fans hating the Lakers. Any potential trade with the Lakers the team also has to weigh PR issues with the fans, particularly if it is a fan favorite going to the C Lakers and making them better. There would have been a problematic amount of Blazers fans upset if they traded Lillard to the Lakers. I think part of the recent relaxed stance is the Blazers fans are really hoping to get rid of some guys (like Grant who was rumored to be in discussion to be traded to LAL) while not believing it pushes the Lakers into championship territory.

Same in Sac. Any Lakers trade would have to be either so minor no one could possibly care or lopsided. Anything in the middle and you’d have to price in pissed off fans. Lose a trade to the Lakers and some fans would dump you for that one act alone.
Myth
RealGM
Posts: 11,786
And1: 10,442
Joined: Oct 01, 2008
   

Re: Interfranchise Animosity and Trades 

Post#16 » by Myth » Sun Jan 26, 2025 6:14 am

SNPA wrote:
Myth wrote:
jscott wrote:Any word on why Blazers and Lakers have heat?

Just old school rivalry, mostly fueled by Blazers fans hating the Lakers. Any potential trade with the Lakers the team also has to weigh PR issues with the fans, particularly if it is a fan favorite going to the C Lakers and making them better. There would have been a problematic amount of Blazers fans upset if they traded Lillard to the Lakers. I think part of the recent relaxed stance is the Blazers fans are really hoping to get rid of some guys (like Grant who was rumored to be in discussion to be traded to LAL) while not believing it pushes the Lakers into championship territory.

Same in Sac. Any Lakers trade would have to be either so minor no one could possibly care or lopsided. Anything in the middle and you’d have to price in pissed off fans. Lose a trade to the Lakers and some fans would dump you for that one act alone.

I didn’t realize that with the Kings, but sure enough, looking at the link above their last trade was 1977.
tmorgan
RealGM
Posts: 14,262
And1: 9,749
Joined: Feb 04, 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
   

Re: Interfranchise Animosity and Trades 

Post#17 » by tmorgan » Sun Jan 26, 2025 6:54 am

penbeast0 wrote:
chrbal wrote:https://www.basketball-reference.com/friv/trades.fcgi

Don’t know the answer, but i stumbled across this trying to figure out the answer


That is nice!


Unless my aging eyes missed something, the most active trading partners are Atlanta and Detroit. Never would have guessed.
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,544
And1: 13,900
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: Interfranchise Animosity and Trades 

Post#18 » by JRoy » Sun Jan 26, 2025 7:18 am

chrbal wrote:https://www.basketball-reference.com/friv/trades.fcgi

Don’t know the answer, but i stumbled across this trying to figure out the answer


That is a great tool.

Looks like POR traded with just about every team over the last 5 years or so except LAL and DAL.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
axeman23
Analyst
Posts: 3,709
And1: 3,616
Joined: Jul 31, 2009

Re: Interfranchise Animosity and Trades 

Post#19 » by axeman23 » Sun Jan 26, 2025 11:38 am

Myth wrote:Blazers may have 3 right now:

Blazers and Lakers haven’t traded in over 40 years, and the trades before that were about as minor as can be. That said, the fans are warming up to the idea, and there were rumored negotiations between the franchises this past summer.

Blazers and Heat had animosity about the Lillard situation. I again hope this doesn’t stop a trade if one makes sense.

Blazers and Warriors had issues related to Gary Payton II, in which the Warriors complained to the league office and accused Portland of lying about medical stuff. Some assume this could be a barrier between current administrations.


Pardon my ignorance: I WAS watching basketball back then, but as a kid I was more of a "name on the front of the jersey over the one on the back" fan, and didn't follow trades too closely. WHAT exactly happened??? :lol: because I've seen that on this forum for a while now "x ammount of GLORIOUS years without a Laker trade", SOMETHING had to go bad...
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,308
And1: 9,869
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: Interfranchise Animosity and Trades 

Post#20 » by penbeast0 » Sun Jan 26, 2025 1:22 pm

For the Wiz, we love trading with Phoenix (the Beal deal!) and apparently just don't want to deal with Pat Riley and the Heat.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.

Return to Trades and Transactions