michaelm wrote:NZB2323 wrote:michaelm wrote:Why did he need to have such a TS% ?. If you watch some of his interviews he said he what he decided to do in his career was help his teams/make his teams win, He was rather successful in that endeavour.
He helped his team win, but he played on stacked teams and was a career 56% free throw shooter. Him missing free throws didn’t help his team win.
He fairly clearly didn’t need to make free throws for his team to win. The Celtics also didn’t win the year before he started playing for them, nor the year after he retired, nor the year he missed the play-offs with an injury. I am led to believe he played with an ankle injury the other year. So did he benefit from a stacked team or did his team-mates benefit from being on his team ?.
For the first 3 years of Russell's career, Bill Sharman and Bob Cousy made all-NBA 1st team. That would be like if Jokic, SGA, and Tatum were all on a team, or Lebron, Durant, and Curry, or Duncan, Kobe, and Shaq, or Jordan, Bird, and Magic. Cousy finished 3rd, 1st, 6th, 4th, 4th, 6th, 8th, and 8th in MVP voting for the years he played with Russell. He also played with Havlicek for 7 years who made 4 all-star teams, 4 all-NBA teams, and finished 10th in MVP voting while playing with Russell. Havlicek would go on to win 2 championships without Russell and 1 Finals MVP.
In the 69 Finals Havlicek averaged 28, 11, and 4 on 45.7% FG and 84.7 FT%. Russell averaged 9, 21, and 5, 39.7% FG and 58.3% FT.
The Celtics also lost Sam Jones after 69, who was a 5 time all-star who made 3 all-NBA teams and finished 9th, 4th, and 5th in MVP voting.
Not only that, but for most of Russell's championships he only had to win 2 rounds.
You can't just rank players by how many rings they won. Otherwise the top 10 list would be:
1. Russell
2. Sam Jones
3. Tom Heinsohn
4. KC Jones
5. Satch Sanders
6. John Havlicek
7. Jim Loscutoff
8. Frank Ramsey
9. Robert Horry
10. Bob Cousy
And if you do it that way, Russell played with 8 top 10 players of all time.
We have to consider everything...championships, Finals MVPs, MVPs, all-NBA teams, statistics, strengths, weaknesses, the eye test...
I mean, you can't really compare what Russell had ages 24-31 to what Kareem had ages 24-31 or what Russell had ages 22-26 to what Jordan had ages 22-26 or what Russell had ages 22-25 to what Lebron had ages 22-25. In 1962 the Celtics had 4 all-stars and the next year they got Havlicek.
Considering the disparity in supporting casts, the disparity of stats, the disparity of the talent in the league(Russell lost to an all-white team in 1957), the lack of being a primary scorer, the lack of being able to make free throws...and I can't rank Russell ahead of Jordan, Lebron, or Kareem. 4th is the highest I can put him but even then I'm not sure if that's right.