Hal14 wrote:When Springer was getting consistent rotation mins in Philly before we traded for him, he was finding that balance well. He was locking guys up - guys like Steph, SGA, Brunson, Luka, etc.
And Tatum.
Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman
Hal14 wrote:When Springer was getting consistent rotation mins in Philly before we traded for him, he was finding that balance well. He was locking guys up - guys like Steph, SGA, Brunson, Luka, etc.
Half-Full wrote:playa-hater wrote:Just saw this thread. I have some mixed feelings about this. On one hand, I am very happy for Springer. Who isn't? But it makes me wonder, what If?? What if Joe would have used Springer and/or Walsh and/or Queta much more??? What If Joe didn't go into short rotations since Nov/Dec?? Would we perhaps have that much needed energy and well Fueled team right now? Is Joe not capable of implementing more players at one time?? Would that make his head spin too much??
We can all wonder and imagine what may have been. It is all unproveable theories at this time. But my Gut says Joe missed a REAL opportunity to do better, far better for both the young players and the TEAM overall.
The three players you mentioned have all shown that they can inject needed energy into a game, and I've seen more than one game where we could have used some energy. When the starters aren't playing so well, and the other team is rolling, why not send in Springer, Queta, and Walsh? Tell them you are counting on them to change things up, and see what they can do. If they aren't effective, what have you lost? The starters weren't doing it either. They could also turn things around, but not if they are glued to the bench watching Tatum fiddling and diddling at the three point line, eating up the clock, then bricking a shot or driving into a crowd and getting stripped of the ball. More PT for them will build their confidence, and provide our starters with needed rest. Seems like that would be a good thing.
playa-hater wrote:Just saw this thread. I have some mixed feelings about this. On one hand, I am very happy for Springer. Who isn't? But it makes me wonder, what If?? What if Joe would have used Springer and/or Walsh and/or Queta much more??? What If Joe didn't go into short rotations since Nov/Dec?? Would we perhaps have that much needed energy and well Fueled team right now? Is Joe not capable of implementing more players at one time?? Would that make his head spin too much??
We can all wonder and imagine what may have been. It is all unproveable theories at this time. But my Gut says Joe missed a REAL opportunity to do better, far better for both the young players and the TEAM overall.
return2glory wrote:playa-hater wrote:Just saw this thread. I have some mixed feelings about this. On one hand, I am very happy for Springer. Who isn't? But it makes me wonder, what If?? What if Joe would have used Springer and/or Walsh and/or Queta much more??? What If Joe didn't go into short rotations since Nov/Dec?? Would we perhaps have that much needed energy and well Fueled team right now? Is Joe not capable of implementing more players at one time?? Would that make his head spin too much??
We can all wonder and imagine what may have been. It is all unproveable theories at this time. But my Gut says Joe missed a REAL opportunity to do better, far better for both the young players and the TEAM overall.
Rest is underestimated, especially after a long championship season the year before. Since we probably won't caught the Cavs for the 1st seed, I'm hoping Joe gives the starters much needed rest. Not asking for much, just cut back on the starters minutes by 2 or 3 minutes a game. Give them an occasionally day off, here and there. Keep them fresh for another title run.
There have been many times this season when the opposing guards were going off and we could have used Springer to apply defensive pressure and cool them off. Even if that meant playing him 5 minutes a half. Especially when some of our guys are flat and playing with very little defensive intensity. You bring a gut or two to exert that energy and it gets the whole team going.
That's one of my change ups with coach Joe "Thibodeau" Mazzulla. Those short rotations, no whatever what. Springer only played against the Clippers because 3 of our top 7 were out.
31to6 wrote:He is back "out" again -- great minutes vs the Bulls.
He's playing defense like a young Avery Bradley and that is high praise!
I will happily eat all of the crow.
Are they just showcasing him to move him, or does he actually have a role with the team going forward?
31to6 wrote:He is back "out" again -- great minutes vs the Bulls.
He's playing defense like a young Avery Bradley and that is high praise!
I will happily eat all of the crow.
Are they just showcasing him to move him, or does he actually have a role with the team going forward?
165bows wrote:31to6 wrote:He is back "out" again -- great minutes vs the Bulls.
He's playing defense like a young Avery Bradley and that is high praise!
I will happily eat all of the crow.
Are they just showcasing him to move him, or does he actually have a role with the team going forward?
Yeah weird how he's gotten unglued from the bench recently. Not sure if he had some low level injury prior or he's just played his way into the rotation?
Hitting on these low level add ons is huge so I'll keep rooting for him if he can get it done.
31to6 wrote:He is back "out" again -- great minutes vs the Bulls.
He's playing defense like a young Avery Bradley and that is high praise!
I will happily eat all of the crow.
Are they just showcasing him to move him, or does he actually have a role with the team going forward?
playa-hater wrote:31to6 wrote:He is back "out" again -- great minutes vs the Bulls.
He's playing defense like a young Avery Bradley and that is high praise!
I will happily eat all of the crow.
Are they just showcasing him to move him, or does he actually have a role with the team going forward?
My money is on showcasing, Because Joe will not expand his rotation Unless Brad put his foot down. Still no guarantee he gets traded. Is there a market for him because of some nice flashes?? At least we know he can hit some 3s. He is a Dawg on defense for sure though.
165bows wrote:playa-hater wrote:31to6 wrote:He is back "out" again -- great minutes vs the Bulls.
He's playing defense like a young Avery Bradley and that is high praise!
I will happily eat all of the crow.
Are they just showcasing him to move him, or does he actually have a role with the team going forward?
My money is on showcasing, Because Joe will not expand his rotation Unless Brad put his foot down. Still no guarantee he gets traded. Is there a market for him because of some nice flashes?? At least we know he can hit some 3s. He is a Dawg on defense for sure though.
Question for me is what's behind him passing Peterson/Walsh in the rotation. Obviously injury opened some time but who gets is the question. Matchups, practice performance, etc etc. Maybe the deadline who knows lol.
31to6 wrote:He is back "out" again -- great minutes vs the Bulls.
He's playing defense like a young Avery Bradley and that is high praise!
I will happily eat all of the crow.
Are they just showcasing him to move him, or does he actually have a role with the team going forward?