Image ImageImage Image

Vuc Trade Thread

Moderators: HomoSapien, Payt10, Ice Man, AshyLarrysDiaper, Tommy Udo 6 , coldfish, kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, Michael Jackson, RedBulls23

League Circles
RealGM
Posts: 35,710
And1: 10,128
Joined: Dec 04, 2001
       

Re: Vuc Trade Thread 

Post#221 » by League Circles » Thu Jan 30, 2025 12:27 pm

Andi Obst wrote:
League Circles wrote:
Andi Obst wrote:There's no way people are talking themselves into building a team around Vuc and Zach again.

I don't know if that's hilarious or really sad or both.

Yeah, pretty sure no one has suggested that. Keeping a player does not equal "building around".


Who are you building around then? Where are the players you build around coming from?

Your picks aren't going to be good enough and free agency won't be an option either.


Well, first of all I believe most teams should not be "building around" a player. There are only like 5 guys worth thinking that way about.

But our players will come from the places that players come from - draft, trades, free agency and development of guys we currently have. A BUNCH of great players have been drafted with worse draft picks than what we project to have. And it's not as if even a top 4 pick is anywhere near some assurance that we'd get a core type high end player, so I don't see the same threshold that you might. And not sure why free agency isn't an option. Lastly, not sure why you think trading Zach would necessarily make us alp that much worse. We've been quite bad lately with him playing well.
https://august-shop.com/ - sneakers and streetwear
User avatar
dougthonus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 59,097
And1: 19,188
Joined: Dec 22, 2004
Contact:
 

Re: Vuc Trade Thread 

Post#222 » by dougthonus » Thu Jan 30, 2025 1:35 pm

SirKaiser wrote:I'm just arguing against the alternative of letting a rookie/soph roster of 20 year old guys run wild is a better vision. I won't argue, however, that this matters on an individual level. Guys like Allen and Pierce are legends, and they were part of a successful organization as a whole. At the very least it needs to be someone who adds toward a better team culture going forward. This team and organization has been garbage but Demar stood out as a good mentor and locker room guy, but unfortunately his skill set on the court contrasted with the style we wanted. It actually makes me wonder if his absence can be a reason for PWill'd horrible season. It would be silly of course, but he has personally credited Demar as being a good mentor.

For me, it comes down to Lavine and Ball (depending on whether he will sign some kind of team-friendly deal). Lavine is debatable, but his talen is unquestionable. When not injured, he has been the best sports star in the city for a while now. And whatever the reason is, he's been a good sport amidst trade talks, unlike Jimmy. If only his value wasn't lower than it should be.


For clarification, I'm not arguing that we should put a ton of guys in with garbage culture that don't know what they're doing with a head coach that offers no accountability.

I'm only saying that people often conflate a lot of different things together. You can be bad and still be well coaches. You can not have enough talent on the roster and still develop individually. I think DeMar was a great mentor based on all the commentary in the league, but I don't think he raised anyone's game any.

My belief is improvement is almost exclusively on the player themselves, outside of that, they have so many support tools around them that you get pretty far down the list before you get to having the right teammates, but there are lots of guys who can be the right teammates too.

To me, I don't see a reason to think Vuc/Zach are specifically the right guys. I would prioritize Lonzo as that person if I was going to look at that, because he calls out the defense, tells people where to go, is excellent at running an organized offense. That is the type of guy more likely to teach people to do the right things and keep things moving the right way.

This isn't to say you can't keep Vuc/Zach and they will destroy things, but you're multiple years from doing anything. You know almost for sure that Vuc isn't part of your next playoff team. Zach could be, but probably unlikely. So if those guys can yield something now, I'd take it.

I'm less worried about Zach, if he finishes off this year well, I think the offers for him in the summer are going to be just as good or better than what you can do at the deadline. I think Vuc is going to fall apart and be dead salary by next year.
Guru
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,835
And1: 825
Joined: Oct 29, 2001

Re: Vuc Trade Thread 

Post#223 » by Guru » Thu Jan 30, 2025 1:57 pm

Dez wrote:
Guru wrote:
Dez wrote:
F*** me.

Yes it does because those players aren't good enough and their contracts prohibit the team from doing anything to make the team better.

You are literally the only person who is being illogical.


You think I'm the only one who is advocating to keep Lavine?


You're in the minority but you're the only one making nonsensical "arguments".


It's in no way illogical to want to build with Lavine when his return isn't worth his value. It's poppycock to think that the only way to build is to tear everything to the studs. There is a wide continuum of ways to build. You're one of an elite few who have completely foreclosed on one idea and any of the infinite other options seem preposterous.
2weekswithpay
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,635
And1: 2,687
Joined: Dec 22, 2020
     

Re: Vuc Trade Thread 

Post#224 » by 2weekswithpay » Thu Jan 30, 2025 2:20 pm

SirKaiser wrote:
2weekswithpay wrote:
Guru wrote:
Players develop more quickly playing with better players and in meaningful games. That's the argument. AND the team as a whole is better more quickly.


Any proof of this?

You're asking for proof of a younger talent benefitting from a mentor? Some of you are so frantic about burning it all down and starting anew (which you're kidding yourselves if you think they'll do this) that you're losing sight of common sense.

How about Rajon Rondo? He made an immediate impact thanks to Ray Allen and Paul Pierce, and in return he helped elevate their game as they got older. Tyrese Maxey is a more recent example.


Why didn't playing with Curry, Draymond, and Klay turn Wiseman, Moody, and Kuminga into good players? Then you have OKC who was the 2nd seed last year while being the youngest team in the NBA.

Younger players do benefit from mentors but ultimately player development is on the player.
Guru
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,835
And1: 825
Joined: Oct 29, 2001

Re: Vuc Trade Thread 

Post#225 » by Guru » Thu Jan 30, 2025 3:21 pm

2weekswithpay wrote:
SirKaiser wrote:
2weekswithpay wrote:
Any proof of this?

You're asking for proof of a younger talent benefitting from a mentor? Some of you are so frantic about burning it all down and starting anew (which you're kidding yourselves if you think they'll do this) that you're losing sight of common sense.

How about Rajon Rondo? He made an immediate impact thanks to Ray Allen and Paul Pierce, and in return he helped elevate their game as they got older. Tyrese Maxey is a more recent example.


Why didn't playing with Curry, Draymond, and Klay turn Wiseman, Moody, and Kuminga into good players? Then you have OKC who was the 2nd seed last year while being the youngest team in the NBA.

Younger players do benefit from mentors but ultimately player development is on the player.


There are lots of ways to skin a cat
boozapalooza
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,624
And1: 986
Joined: Jun 26, 2013

Re: Vuc Trade Thread 

Post#226 » by boozapalooza » Thu Jan 30, 2025 11:22 pm

Read on Twitter
?s=46

If true, interesting. Capela is on an expiring deal. Couldve got off that Vuc contract. Not sure why we would ask for more unless we have better offers out there…although we know AK is an irrational negotiator.

AKME better be cooking…
Muzbar
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,380
And1: 2,996
Joined: Apr 03, 2002
Location: Australia
Contact:
 

Re: Vuc Trade Thread 

Post#227 » by Muzbar » Thu Jan 30, 2025 11:50 pm

boozapalooza wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=46

If true, interesting. Capela is on an expiring deal. Couldve got off that Vuc contract. Not sure why we would ask for more unless we have better offers out there…although we know AK is an irrational negotiator.

AKME better be cooking…

I don't think that's true.

They've been rumoured forever that they want to move Capela to make way for Okongwu, acquiring Vuc does the opposite of that.
Here to argue about nonsensical things and suck away your joy. :kissmybutt:
meekrab
RealGM
Posts: 14,116
And1: 10,800
Joined: Dec 15, 2014

Re: Vuc Trade Thread 

Post#228 » by meekrab » Fri Jan 31, 2025 12:03 am

boozapalooza wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=46

If true, interesting. Capela is on an expiring deal. Couldve got off that Vuc contract. Not sure why we would ask for more unless we have better offers out there…although we know AK is an irrational negotiator.

AKME better be cooking…

Don't think AK views Vuc's contract as something that needs to be 'gotten off' of. :dontknow:
sco
RealGM
Posts: 27,622
And1: 9,294
Joined: Sep 22, 2003
Location: Virtually Everywhere!

Re: Vuc Trade Thread 

Post#229 » by sco » Fri Jan 31, 2025 12:12 am

I see Turner is looking for a $30M+ deal and Indy doesn't want to pay that much, and is willing to consider trades.

Turner would be a huge difference maker for us if we care about being good right away. Wonder if Vuc and Por 1st for Turner would get indy to the table.

Turner makes Giddey's defense workable, yet still gives 3pt ability.

Finding 1 more star would make a team with Turner and Zach a near-contender, and we might have the assets to make it happen.
:clap:
Dez
General Manager
Posts: 7,791
And1: 9,364
Joined: Jul 23, 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
 

Re: Vuc Trade Thread 

Post#230 » by Dez » Fri Jan 31, 2025 8:37 am

sco wrote:I see Turner is looking for a $30M+ deal and Indy doesn't want to pay that much, and is willing to consider trades.

Turner would be a huge difference maker for us if we care about being good right away. Wonder if Vuc and Por 1st for Turner would get indy to the table.

Turner makes Giddey's defense workable, yet still gives 3pt ability.

Finding 1 more star would make a team with Turner and Zach a near-contender, and we might have the assets to make it happen.


That star would need to be prime LeBron, prime KD, prime or healthy Kawhi.
WesPeace
Pro Prospect
Posts: 795
And1: 379
Joined: Jan 12, 2025
Location: Planet Earth
     

Re: Vuc Trade Thread 

Post#231 » by WesPeace » Fri Jan 31, 2025 9:09 am

boozapalooza wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=46

If true, interesting. Capela is on an expiring deal. Couldve got off that Vuc contract. Not sure why we would ask for more unless we have better offers out there…although we know AK is an irrational negotiator.

AKME better be cooking…


I think straight swap is really kinda unfair, additional asset from Hawks would be logical, even tho Capela is expiring. CC just isnt the same center he was years ago.
boozapalooza
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,624
And1: 986
Joined: Jun 26, 2013

Re: Vuc Trade Thread 

Post#232 » by boozapalooza » Fri Jan 31, 2025 4:00 pm

WesPeace wrote:
boozapalooza wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=46

If true, interesting. Capela is on an expiring deal. Couldve got off that Vuc contract. Not sure why we would ask for more unless we have better offers out there…although we know AK is an irrational negotiator.

AKME better be cooking…


I think straight swap is really kinda unfair, additional asset from Hawks would be logical, even tho Capela is expiring. CC just isnt the same center he was years ago.


Capela is on an expiring deal though…would clear $21M of cap space for us this offseason and give opportunity for Jalen Smith to get more minutes starting C for the rest of the season.

Not a bad deal imo but reasonable for AK to hold out for more over the next week.
User avatar
HomoSapien
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 37,623
And1: 30,787
Joined: Aug 17, 2009
 

Re: Vuc Trade Thread 

Post#233 » by HomoSapien » Sat Feb 1, 2025 4:49 am

I wonder if Hawks would consider:

Vuc and Portland Pick for Capella and 2025 LAL Pick?
ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.
Muzbar
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,380
And1: 2,996
Joined: Apr 03, 2002
Location: Australia
Contact:
 

Re: Vuc Trade Thread 

Post#234 » by Muzbar » Sat Feb 1, 2025 5:03 am

I addressed this earlier or in another thread (wherever this tweet came up in earlier).

The Hawks apparently want to move Capela to give the starting C spot to Okongwu, acquiring Vuc doesn't help do that.

Fake news, IMO.
Here to argue about nonsensical things and suck away your joy. :kissmybutt:
boozapalooza
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,624
And1: 986
Joined: Jun 26, 2013

Re: Vuc Trade Thread 

Post#235 » by boozapalooza » Sat Feb 1, 2025 6:13 pm

What about Vuc to the Lakers for Rui/Knecht? No picks involved, Knecht would be the FRP equivalent. Lakers go win now while keeping their sparce draft capital in tact (2026 & 2028 1sts). Salaries work as well.

Rui is a servicable 4 still with some upside and Knecht in a more prominent role could be interesting. Lots of upside there.

With Lebron at 40 and AD at 31, the Lakers have a 2-3 year window (at most) to push their chips in the middle on a deal like this. Im aware Knecht is highly valued but hes probably not involved this year come playoff time.

I love this deal for the Bulls because I’m sold on taking a chance on Knecht’s upside in a few years with more development and minutes. I like the approach of getting a young guy like Knecht instead of trading for bad salaries and a likely non-lotto FRP
sco
RealGM
Posts: 27,622
And1: 9,294
Joined: Sep 22, 2003
Location: Virtually Everywhere!

Re: Vuc Trade Thread 

Post#236 » by sco » Sat Feb 1, 2025 6:14 pm

boozapalooza wrote:What about Vuc to the Lakers for Rui/Knecht? No picks involved, Knecht would be the FRP equivalent. Lakers go win now while keeping their sparce draft capital in tact (2026 & 2028 1sts). Salaries work as well.

Rui is a servicable 4 still with some upside and Knecht in a more prominent role could be interesting. Lots of upside there.

With Lebron at 40 and AD at 31, the Lakers have a 2-3 year window (at most) to push their chips in the middle on a deal like this. Im aware Knecht is highly valued but hes probably not involved this year come playoff time.

I love this deal for the Bulls because I’m sold on taking a chance on Knecht’s upside in a few years with more development and minutes. I like the approach of getting a young guy like Knecht instead of trading for bad salaries and a likely non-lotto FRP

They like Knecht, no way they trade him for Vuc.
:clap:
User avatar
Salo23
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,639
And1: 487
Joined: Jul 09, 2001

Re: Vuc Trade Thread 

Post#237 » by Salo23 » Sun Feb 2, 2025 7:36 pm

https://clutchpoints.com/nba-rumors-mavericks-bulls-daniel-gafford-nikola-vucevic-trade

Gafford for Vucevic?

Bulls get rim protection and a younger big still entering his prime, Dallas gets a better fit next to Davis/Lively and replaces some of Kleber’s floor spacing.

With Gafford and Buzelis shot blocking abilities it makes it easier to fit Giddey into certain lineups, if we retain both Giddey and Lonzo that makes Gafford valuable in the vertical spacing / dunker spot offensively.

Gafford is basically a younger, cheaper Clint Capela which was discussed previously.
We are missing a lot of layups right now as a team, and that is on me... It’s my job to make sure we’re ready to make our layups." - Thibodeau.
sco
RealGM
Posts: 27,622
And1: 9,294
Joined: Sep 22, 2003
Location: Virtually Everywhere!

Re: Vuc Trade Thread 

Post#238 » by sco » Sun Feb 2, 2025 7:50 pm

Salo23 wrote:https://clutchpoints.com/nba-rumors-mavericks-bulls-daniel-gafford-nikola-vucevic-trade

Gafford for Vucevic?

Bulls get rim protection and a younger big still entering his prime, Dallas gets a better fit next to Davis/Lively and replaces some of Kleber’s floor spacing.

With Gafford and Buzelis shot blocking abilities it makes it easier to fit Giddey into certain lineups, if we retain both Giddey and Lonzo that makes Gafford valuable in the vertical spacing / dunker spot offensively.

Gafford is basically a younger, cheaper Clint Capela which was discussed previously.

Just checked. Gafford is only 26 and makes $14M. I would think we'd need to take back more in salary, but if it were expiring, I'd do it.
:clap:
User avatar
HomoSapien
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 37,623
And1: 30,787
Joined: Aug 17, 2009
 

Re: Vuc Trade Thread 

Post#239 » by HomoSapien » Tue Feb 4, 2025 6:26 am

I just came in here to post the Gafford rumor. Would love that trade but I would also be just so cheesed off that AKME is just trading back for assets/players he traded away for no reason.
ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.
WindyCityBorn
RealGM
Posts: 22,311
And1: 11,943
Joined: Jun 26, 2014
     

Re: Vuc Trade Thread 

Post#240 » by WindyCityBorn » Tue Feb 4, 2025 6:38 am

I want Vuc off this team so we can really bottom out. If we keep him I’m gonna be more annoyed than I already am. If you can trade Zach for peanuts then just get whatever you can for Vuc too.

Return to Chicago Bulls