MartyConlonOnTheRun wrote:about to do two hours of house work. what's the best emergency pods on this I should have queued up?
Hoops collective. Tim MacMahon has some good insight into the Mavs. Since he is espn’s reporter for the Mavs
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
MartyConlonOnTheRun wrote:about to do two hours of house work. what's the best emergency pods on this I should have queued up?
jokeboy86 wrote:Castle Black wrote:
It's annoying that the grifters of media look for every opportunity to turn every single thing as something to rage against things/people/organizations they don't like. But I get it. They're not on the biggest networks anymore so they have to grift to feed the rage/angry fanbases of modern society because that is how they can pay their bills. It's just obvious that they try way to hard to appeal to their most fervent audience to the point that you wonder do they actually have any thoughts of their own about anything.
MartyConlonOnTheRun wrote:about to do two hours of house work. what's the best emergency pods on this I should have queued up?
jokeboy86 wrote:My theory on this is basically Harrison felt he could not have traded Luka without getting a "star" back and Davis is as close as he could get to fitting this label. Even when teams get huge hauls of future draft picks(even unprotected ones) for stars it still can be hard to sell to the most casual of fans because you're trying to get them to be patience and wait for the future when it comes time to cash in these picks.
Golabki wrote:The Gasol trade always seemed a little suspicious, but I moved on. And I like to joke about the Lakers' free throw advantage—I get it with LeBron and AD, but does Austin Reaves really need a superstar whistle too? Still, I never took it too seriously.
But now? I’m fully convinced the NBA is rigged for the Lakers. Other owners should be demanding that this trade be voided and investigated.
If you told me this deal happened because Dr. Buss rose from the grave as the Lich King and stole the soul of Miriam Adelson, I’d have to admit—I’ve never believed in necromancy, but that explanation makes more sense than the Mavs just not being able to get two firsts for Luka.
Loneshot wrote:Seek help. Immediately. It's called business. Believe it or not, each team is managed independently. Wild right, the thought that billionaire owners understand what they are doing.
flow wrote:Both teams get worse. Good news for the rest of the west.
.
The Corey's wrote:JM00n69 wrote:JM00n69 wrote:
NBA commissioner has the power to do what they want. No trade will happen without passing him first. If both teams have agreed there's about 0 chance he'll intertwine. People bring up Stern blocking Chris Paul to the Lakers back in the day but a lot of them don't know that was solely because the Hornets at the time were managed by the NBA due to the teams ownership issues and Stern, being the one person in charge of the league and the Hornets, saw it as a a conflict of interests if he traded Paul to LA and make them the best team in the league.
You're not firing the commissioner for protecting the integrity of the game.
No matter what you or anyone else says. This trade has destroyed the integrity and credibility of the game.
It's that bad. You'll be hearing about this for decades. Worse than the frozen envelope theory in the NBA lottery.
LakerLegend wrote:LeBron was literally more athletic at 35 than he was at 20
JustBuzzin wrote:flow wrote:Both teams get worse. Good news for the rest of the west.
.
Luka got Kyrie to the Finals last year with role players. What you think he gone do with LeBron?![]()
Y'all better bash the Lakers now because I think people forgot who Luka is and how he can lift a team. LeBron in that Pippen role sheesh good luck.
LakerLegend wrote:LeBron was literally more athletic at 35 than he was at 20
JustBuzzin wrote:The funny part in all this is the people who think Luka and LeBron aren't a formidable championship duo.
Do you realize LeBron is now playing the Pippen role. This man was literally the best player on the floor vs the Knicks last night. They are a legit center away from winning the West this year.
I said what I said.
Iwasawitness wrote:The Corey's wrote:JM00n69 wrote:
You're not firing the commissioner for protecting the integrity of the game.
No matter what you or anyone else says. This trade has destroyed the integrity and credibility of the game.
It's that bad. You'll be hearing about this for decades. Worse than the frozen envelope theory in the NBA lottery.
People are really starting to overrate this trade for the Lakers.
hauntedcomputer wrote:jokeboy86 wrote:My theory on this is basically Harrison felt he could not have traded Luka without getting a "star" back and Davis is as close as he could get to fitting this label. Even when teams get huge hauls of future draft picks(even unprotected ones) for stars it still can be hard to sell to the most casual of fans because you're trying to get them to be patience and wait for the future when it comes time to cash in these picks.
Find me a single Mavs fan sold on this. Mavs Reddit is in flames burning everything down. Most claim to be done (we know how that goes)
JJ_PR wrote:We’ve seen trades get vetoed before, and one of the most famous ones also involved the Lakers. Funny thing is, the Lakers package for CP3 was actually solid. This on the other hand is lopsided beyond comprehension.
I don’t see the trade going through.
jokeboy86 wrote:
Why is this guy so sure of himself? He's got 1 Finals appearance and no rings and he thinks he's the smartest GM in the league. At least Calvin Booth has a title and that's the reason he's acting so smug. The fact that he's acting like this is such a genius/obvious move to make and taking a shot at Luka(that "defense" quip), who was the most decorated Mavs player since Dirk is disturbing and oft-putting.
BasketballAnon wrote:jokeboy86 wrote:Castle Black wrote:
It's annoying that the grifters of media look for every opportunity to turn every single thing as something to rage against things/people/organizations they don't like. But I get it. They're not on the biggest networks anymore so they have to grift to feed the rage/angry fanbases of modern society because that is how they can pay their bills. It's just obvious that they try way to hard to appeal to their most fervent audience to the point that you wonder do they actually have any thoughts of their own about anything.
People not connected to major networks are far more likely to tell you the truth or give you a different POV than anyone at ESPN, CBS, NBC, ABC, Fox, FS1 and so forth will. Those channels aren't going to accuse their partners of bribery, corruption and so forth. They might say, "oh wow, I don't agree with Silver on ____" or "they are shooting too many three's" but they aren't going much further than that.
This applies to non-basketball issues as well. Essentially, "follow the money".