jayjaysee wrote:Apz wrote:jayjaysee wrote:
A couple times ITT so far I think I’ve said Dallas is responsible for dumping Klay.. Miami ends up with GSW protected first and Dallas. GSW probably lottery protected cause it can roll over, Dallas probably top 8 because it can’t?
Miami ends up with a really ugly player package, yes. But it would be 2 year contracts (ugly like Maxi, Vincent, Anderson, Buddy or something..) but two firsts that likely convey around the teens this season so good value overall..
And I’m still saying Miami/GSW can do better than Dallas. Just that GSW is the best value available for Butler. So probably should be trying to make it work..
But according to this forum it costs a 1st to dump klay(personally dont agree) and mavs only got 1. So either miami get klay and a 1st and figure it out themselves, or mavs deal klay with the 1st and miami get what comes out of that. Also dont really see mavs dealing omax now when he finally started to settle into nba and grimes is what people on these boards demands 1st for youneverknowwhatyougetwiggins.
I don’t think it costs a first to dump Klay, especially since Miami is willing to take on a two year deal.
I imagine LAL adds a second to turn Vincent+JHS+wood or Reddish into Klay honestly.
Imagine Phoenix does Nurk for Klay…
Not sure how many more examples there are but probably some. And that’s not even including the Philly 2nd that Dallas would add.
Grimes.. I would love to trade Klay and keep Grimes.
But I don’t think the Venetian group will spend like we all were spoiled with. So if you’re adding Wiggins, it likely means Grimes isn’t kept anyways.
If mavs gonna eat multiyear bad contracts im definetly out. Rather keep klay and our depth then overpaying for wiggins. Im sure this team when healthy can go to the finals again
