Yallbecrazy wrote:Syd-TK3 wrote:Yallbecrazy wrote:
I agree with all of this, but shooting is very unpredictable for draft picks and Ace Bailey has a relatively terrible free throw percentage for a shooter, which is often a good predictor for shooting as a pro.
Klay was also a better defender and had much better assists in college.
If you're drafting a pure shooter then those guys aren't really worth lottery picks unless they can contribute in other ways and Bailey's defense doesn't necessarily project as a weakness like Hawkins, but it's not a strength either.
Klay also had high 80s free throw shooting like most shooters. (Bailey is at 67%)
I understand Klay can't create his own shot like Bailey, but I can also see a large percentage of outcomes where Ace becomes a black hole on offense and doesn't even shoot it well enough to justify him being on the floor while also being a negative in the rest of his game. BBIQ is not something that is easily developed, you don't see many guys come into the league without it and suddenly become good at it. Jaylen Brown is one of the few and even then you would say his bbiq is mostly average, and he is apparently an incredibly intelligent guy off the court so that is not really an example to follow.
I understand the outlier skill he has is important and I foresee him being a poor man's Durant some percentage of the time, but I also see a guy who isn't good enough to start on a contender a very large percentage of the time, and a complete bust some percentage of the time too. Even if he becomes a good or great shooter how much of an overall impact will he have if he makes his teammates worse by being a black hole, and projects to be an average defender at best?
Klay ended up hitting well above his 90th percentile outcome as he became an all time great shooter, but if you're expecting or projecting a guy to be an all time great shooter as the reason for taking him high then you are drafting incorrectly as there are many more guys who end up being streaky shooters who top out around average or above average and are negative overalls because of the rest of their game.
I just can't put him in my top 5 in this class, and I lean toward not putting him in my top 10 either. Maybe last year he was worth a top 3 pick as a boom/bust guy, but there are much better options in this draft at the top.
Bailey is honestly not a bad free throw shooter he just doesn't take much. So having a 1/8 and 2/8 game dramatically hurts the averages. In reality he's more likely a mid 70s guy. I'm not sure how you could see him and think he won't be a good overall shooter or isn't already
He projects as a similar shooter to Beasley.
Beasley as a pro was an averagish shooter who didn't do anything else really well and ended up being a rotation player, but was always below league average.
Beasley actually projected to be a much better defender and significantly better rebounder too.
Bailey and Beasley have similar profiles, and while Beasley obviously hit one of his lower end outcomes he was actually a much superior prospect to Bailey.
Assuming you're talking about Michael Beasley?
Beasley had a lot of off-court issues and mental health struggles too, that may have ultimately affected his NBA career. Putting in the work off-court and staying mentally focused plays a large part in the development of young players, they can't just rely on talent alone.
They seem like completely different prospects to me. Beasley was much more of a driver and less of a shooter (2.9 3PA/game, 8.5 FTA/game). Beasley was also 6'7 without shoes. Ace is a very dynamic shooter, but that is essentially his only elite skill..on top of having great height/length/athleticism.
Anyhow, Ace just had a 3/15 game. Funny that every time he does well, a few of the ppl obsessed with him come out to gloat, then when he does poorly, they disappear. In order to reach his potential, he's gonna need to find ways to score when defenses are tight or if his shot is off. I think Darko's a good coach for him.