azcatz11 wrote:Who will be the first to defend these comments?
We've had a few people here who have echoed this sentiment before. Perhaps they are on vacation.
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
azcatz11 wrote:Who will be the first to defend these comments?
leolozon wrote:Comparing it to slavery is dumb, but it’s still weird when you think about it. You sign a contract to play with a team and then they trade you to a place you didn’t agree to be in.
Is there any other profession where workers can be traded for each other? The concept of trading humans against their will is weird.
gottamakeit wrote:Nate505 wrote:gottamakeit wrote:There are points of comparison between trading players (in most sports leagues) to trading slaves but there are significant differences too. When players make the comparison to slavery, they have their lived-in experience of the disparity of power-dynamics between themselves and the owners. While we on the outside, mostly see the differences because we're made peace with the power-dynamics within our own lives.
Yeah, significant differences.
Like the player can refuse to go and just retire from the league instead of getting chained and horsewhipped. That would be a rather significant difference.
But other than that, how was the play Mrs. Lincoln.
Like I said. Personal experiences lens everything a person understands and sees. If youre disagreeing with that statement, I don't think you much wisdom.
It's kinda funny how you attribute understanding to a feminine quality. I bet you're a great conversationalist.
leolozon wrote:Comparing it to slavery is dumb, but it’s still weird when you think about it. You sign a contract to play with a team and then they trade you to a place you didn’t agree to be in.
Is there any other profession where workers can be traded for each other? The concept of trading humans against their will is weird.
leolozon wrote:Comparing it to slavery is dumb, but it’s still weird when you think about it. You sign a contract to play with a team and then they trade you to a place you didn’t agree to be in.
Is there any other profession where workers can be traded for each other? The concept of trading humans against their will is weird.
MrBigShot wrote:leolozon wrote:Comparing it to slavery is dumb, but it’s still weird when you think about it. You sign a contract to play with a team and then they trade you to a place you didn’t agree to be in.
Is there any other profession where workers can be traded for each other? The concept of trading humans against their will is weird.
The NBA is one big business, not 30 businesses. Players are compensated exceptionally well to account for things like mandatary media interviews, spending a lot of time on the road away from family, and potentially being traded elsewhere
Dennis Schroeder gets paid $13 million a year. Would I take 13 mil if it meant I might have to spend half of a 6 month season in a different place? Hell yes.
runtmc wrote:leolozon wrote:Comparing it to slavery is dumb, but it’s still weird when you think about it. You sign a contract to play with a team and then they trade you to a place you didn’t agree to be in.
Is there any other profession where workers can be traded for each other? The concept of trading humans against their will is weird.
Nobody is trading humans, what on earth are you talking?.
leolozon wrote:MrBigShot wrote:leolozon wrote:Comparing it to slavery is dumb, but it’s still weird when you think about it. You sign a contract to play with a team and then they trade you to a place you didn’t agree to be in.
Is there any other profession where workers can be traded for each other? The concept of trading humans against their will is weird.
The NBA is one big business, not 30 businesses. Players are compensated exceptionally well to account for things like mandatary media interviews, spending a lot of time on the road away from family, and potentially being traded elsewhere
Dennis Schroeder gets paid $13 million a year. Would I take 13 mil if it meant I might have to spend half of a 6 month season in a different place? Hell yes.
They are indeed well compensated and the concept of trading human being is still weird. We are just used to it in sports.
Businesses that are in many cities, like any global business, don’t trade people. So the NBA being one business isn’t a good argument.
leolozon wrote:runtmc wrote:leolozon wrote:Comparing it to slavery is dumb, but it’s still weird when you think about it. You sign a contract to play with a team and then they trade you to a place you didn’t agree to be in.
Is there any other profession where workers can be traded for each other? The concept of trading humans against their will is weird.
Nobody is trading humans, what on earth are you talking?.
Everyone seems to agree that Doncic was traded for AD and that both are humans.
I’m not sure why you wrote the rest as I’ve never said that this is wrong.
ryguy613 wrote:This is probably the dumbest thing a player has said since he didnt have enough to feed his family because "yes we make a lot of money but we also spend a lot of money". Some guys are probably better limiting what they say for their own good.
leolozon wrote:MrBigShot wrote:leolozon wrote:Comparing it to slavery is dumb, but it’s still weird when you think about it. You sign a contract to play with a team and then they trade you to a place you didn’t agree to be in.
Is there any other profession where workers can be traded for each other? The concept of trading humans against their will is weird.
The NBA is one big business, not 30 businesses. Players are compensated exceptionally well to account for things like mandatary media interviews, spending a lot of time on the road away from family, and potentially being traded elsewhere
Dennis Schroeder gets paid $13 million a year. Would I take 13 mil if it meant I might have to spend half of a 6 month season in a different place? Hell yes.
They are indeed well compensated and the concept of trading human being is still weird. We are just used to it in sports.
Businesses that are in many cities, like any global business, don’t trade people. So the NBA being one business isn’t a good argument.
leolozon wrote:runtmc wrote:leolozon wrote:Comparing it to slavery is dumb, but it’s still weird when you think about it. You sign a contract to play with a team and then they trade you to a place you didn’t agree to be in.
Is there any other profession where workers can be traded for each other? The concept of trading humans against their will is weird.
Nobody is trading humans, what on earth are you talking?.
Everyone seems to agree that Doncic was traded for AD and that both are humans.
I’m not sure why you wrote the rest as I’ve never said that this is wrong.