ImageImageImage

Around the NBA (Part Two)

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

guest81
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,917
And1: 2,363
Joined: Jun 26, 2014

Re: Around the NBA (Part Two) 

Post#801 » by guest81 » Mon Feb 3, 2025 7:23 pm

On the bill simmons podcast apparently there was more coming to the Mavs but the Lakers talked them down. Insanity
guest81
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,917
And1: 2,363
Joined: Jun 26, 2014

Re: Around the NBA (Part Two) 

Post#802 » by guest81 » Mon Feb 3, 2025 7:25 pm

younggunsmn wrote:
shrink wrote:
guest81 wrote:Who do you want him taking minutes from?

I want a credible, reliable PG in case Mike goes down. MacLaughlin is better than Dillingham this year, especially since he has had so much experience playing with so many of the Wolves. The less PG responsibilities Ant has this year, the better.


I agree, and there's a chance after all the smoke clears they just cut him.
For the immediate future we badly need big man help though.


Im pretty sure as a second apron team the wolves can't sign a buyout guy
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,674
And1: 23,024
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Around the NBA (Part Two) 

Post#803 » by Klomp » Mon Feb 3, 2025 7:32 pm

guest81 wrote:
younggunsmn wrote:
shrink wrote:I want a credible, reliable PG in case Mike goes down. MacLaughlin is better than Dillingham this year, especially since he has had so much experience playing with so many of the Wolves. The less PG responsibilities Ant has this year, the better.


I agree, and there's a chance after all the smoke clears they just cut him.
For the immediate future we badly need big man help though.


Im pretty sure as a second apron team the wolves can't sign a buyout guy

I believe that's only buyouts over a certain dollar amount, not all of them. McLaughlin would be available in that case.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
guest81
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,917
And1: 2,363
Joined: Jun 26, 2014

Re: Around the NBA (Part Two) 

Post#804 » by guest81 » Mon Feb 3, 2025 7:57 pm

Klomp wrote:
guest81 wrote:
younggunsmn wrote:
I agree, and there's a chance after all the smoke clears they just cut him.
For the immediate future we badly need big man help though.


Im pretty sure as a second apron team the wolves can't sign a buyout guy

I believe that's only buyouts over a certain dollar amount, not all of them. McLaughlin would be available in that case.


Second apron is so dumb
BlacJacMac
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,908
And1: 3,585
Joined: Aug 25, 2020
       

Re: Around the NBA (Part Two) 

Post#805 » by BlacJacMac » Mon Feb 3, 2025 8:01 pm

guest81 wrote:
younggunsmn wrote:
shrink wrote:I want a credible, reliable PG in case Mike goes down. MacLaughlin is better than Dillingham this year, especially since he has had so much experience playing with so many of the Wolves. The less PG responsibilities Ant has this year, the better.


I agree, and there's a chance after all the smoke clears they just cut him.
For the immediate future we badly need big man help though.


Im pretty sure as a second apron team the wolves can't sign a buyout guy


Its actually 1st apron. And its that you can't sign anyone bought out that was making more than the MLE.
Guest84
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,827
And1: 893
Joined: Dec 13, 2017
 

Re: Around the NBA (Part Two) 

Post#806 » by Guest84 » Mon Feb 3, 2025 8:04 pm

Klomp wrote:
Guest84 wrote:Are all these trades "really" just a result of the CBA apron restrictions??

There's been a push for NY and LA to get big name stars on those teams. Then boom, Towns to NY for basically nothing and now Luka for basically nothing. Yeah AD is a good player but there's no way they got anything near equal value for Luka. They also didn't "shop" him for the best value.

This wreaks of an under the table deal to get LA a successor for the years after LBJ. The NBA might as well come out and admit they're just like the WWE. There's a cover up going on regarding this.

That's quite the conspiracy theory. I get why it's out there, but I just don't think it has any legs to it.


Idk, this just seems real shady and has all the makings of a backroom type of deal. Keep in mind it's a global business now and they want to continue that. Especially with them wanting to potentially add games globally.

Why not have a "global" star in a larger market (LA) to help build that audience base in the coming years??

There's also this news of both AD and Luka recently buying houses in their current cities prior to make it seem like they were there for the long run. Not sure that matters but it is a detail that "media outlets" are running currently. Why? Idk

Just a real shady trade...
BlacJacMac
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,908
And1: 3,585
Joined: Aug 25, 2020
       

Re: Around the NBA (Part Two) 

Post#807 » by BlacJacMac » Mon Feb 3, 2025 8:17 pm

A "fun" comment from Canis:

It's just a matter of time before there's a swap of two impending supermax players, so the teams can keep the price down. I.e. here comes the Banchero-Holmgren trade saving each team $117M.
younggunsmn
Head Coach
Posts: 6,835
And1: 2,671
Joined: May 28, 2007
Location: Hiding from the thought police.

Re: Around the NBA (Part Two) 

Post#808 » by younggunsmn » Mon Feb 3, 2025 11:06 pm

winforlose wrote:
Loaf_of_bread wrote:
winforlose wrote:
This does not happen without owner approval. A side deal was reached between owners that had nothing to do with basketball. Nothing else makes sense.
What do you mean by, "A side deal was reached between owners"?


In order to justify a trade that cannot be justified you must look beyond the game. Owners have business interests beyond basketball. The Mavs new ownership group runs Vegas Casinos and probably has fingers in other pies. If the Lakers do well that makes money for sports books (more people bet on the Lakers than the Mavs,) so maybe the Mavs ownership gets a payoff from sports books and/or the Lakers ownership does something (I have no idea what,) for the Mavs ownerships business interests, and presto, the terrible and inexplicable trade happens. If you disagree, then please explain why only the Lakers were allowed to bid on Luka, and only one pick transferred from LAL to Dallas?


I mean if you want to go further down that rabbit hole you can speculate on who blackmailed Mark Cuban, one of the most passionate owners in all of sports, who is not in any sort of financial predicament, into selling a controlling stake in the Mavericks, who were pretty much his baby.

Guy goes from outspoken and independent tech bro in a T shirt and Jeans to selling his team and going on a political simping tour cosplaying as Rachel Maddow during which he looked absolutely miserable.

Something really doesn't add up there.
There was more to that Kevin Spacey-esque front office scandal they had a few years ago than was ever released to the public.

Nico Harrison wasn't just making an unforgivable trade, he's been an Adam Silver plant from the beginning.
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,391
And1: 5,939
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Around the NBA (Part Two) 

Post#809 » by winforlose » Mon Feb 3, 2025 11:08 pm

younggunsmn wrote:
winforlose wrote:
Loaf_of_bread wrote: What do you mean by, "A side deal was reached between owners"?


In order to justify a trade that cannot be justified you must look beyond the game. Owners have business interests beyond basketball. The Mavs new ownership group runs Vegas Casinos and probably has fingers in other pies. If the Lakers do well that makes money for sports books (more people bet on the Lakers than the Mavs,) so maybe the Mavs ownership gets a payoff from sports books and/or the Lakers ownership does something (I have no idea what,) for the Mavs ownerships business interests, and presto, the terrible and inexplicable trade happens. If you disagree, then please explain why only the Lakers were allowed to bid on Luka, and only one pick transferred from LAL to Dallas?


I mean if you want to go further down that rabbit hole you can speculate on who blackmailed Cuban, one of the most passionate owners in all of sports who is not in any sort of financial predicament, into selling the Mavericks, who were pretty much his baby.

Guy goes from outspoken and independent tech bro in a T shirt and Jeans to selling his team and going on a political simping tour cosplaying as Rachel Maddow.

Something really doesn't add up there.
There was more to that Kevin Spacey esque front office scandal they had than was ever released to the public.

Nico Harrison wasn't just making a dumb trade, he's been an Adam Silver plant from the beginning.


I see what you did there ;). So I will ask you to help me out with something. Please show me an example, literally any example in any major sport, of a top 5 talent being traded in a closed negotiation. Literally only accepting offers from a single team. Show me that and we can talk.
BlacJacMac
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,908
And1: 3,585
Joined: Aug 25, 2020
       

Re: Around the NBA (Part Two) 

Post#810 » by BlacJacMac » Tue Feb 4, 2025 12:21 am

CBS Sports:
The last nine months represented a real chance for the Bulls to reset and build this thing properly. In that span, they failed to net a single first-round pick for Caruso, DeRozan or LaVine aside from one they could've kept by simply losing more games.
TimberKat
Head Coach
Posts: 6,133
And1: 3,087
Joined: Jul 02, 2022
         

Re: Around the NBA (Part Two) 

Post#811 » by TimberKat » Tue Feb 4, 2025 12:44 am

winforlose wrote:
younggunsmn wrote:
winforlose wrote:
In order to justify a trade that cannot be justified you must look beyond the game. Owners have business interests beyond basketball. The Mavs new ownership group runs Vegas Casinos and probably has fingers in other pies. If the Lakers do well that makes money for sports books (more people bet on the Lakers than the Mavs,) so maybe the Mavs ownership gets a payoff from sports books and/or the Lakers ownership does something (I have no idea what,) for the Mavs ownerships business interests, and presto, the terrible and inexplicable trade happens. If you disagree, then please explain why only the Lakers were allowed to bid on Luka, and only one pick transferred from LAL to Dallas?


I mean if you want to go further down that rabbit hole you can speculate on who blackmailed Cuban, one of the most passionate owners in all of sports who is not in any sort of financial predicament, into selling the Mavericks, who were pretty much his baby.

Guy goes from outspoken and independent tech bro in a T shirt and Jeans to selling his team and going on a political simping tour cosplaying as Rachel Maddow.

Something really doesn't add up there.
There was more to that Kevin Spacey esque front office scandal they had than was ever released to the public.

Nico Harrison wasn't just making a dumb trade, he's been an Adam Silver plant from the beginning.


I see what you did there ;). So I will ask you to help me out with something. Please show me an example, literally any example in any major sport, of a top 5 talent being traded in a closed negotiation. Literally only accepting offers from a single team. Show me that and we can talk.

I had multiple conversations with others on "only accepting offers from a single team". I just don't think that is true. At least UTA knew and I am sure Ainge had put some counter proposal on the table. You can blame Nico for his fixation on Davis but I am sure they had look at other offers.

I also think Lakers are in the Fox discussion. So it's either Knecht + Reaves + 2 1st. for Fox or Davis + 1st for Luka. So, Lakers had some leverage. I don't think it's a coincidence the Fox trade comes out right after Luka trade.
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,391
And1: 5,939
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Around the NBA (Part Two) 

Post#812 » by winforlose » Tue Feb 4, 2025 12:51 am

TimberKat wrote:
winforlose wrote:
younggunsmn wrote:
I mean if you want to go further down that rabbit hole you can speculate on who blackmailed Cuban, one of the most passionate owners in all of sports who is not in any sort of financial predicament, into selling the Mavericks, who were pretty much his baby.

Guy goes from outspoken and independent tech bro in a T shirt and Jeans to selling his team and going on a political simping tour cosplaying as Rachel Maddow.

Something really doesn't add up there.
There was more to that Kevin Spacey esque front office scandal they had than was ever released to the public.

Nico Harrison wasn't just making a dumb trade, he's been an Adam Silver plant from the beginning.


I see what you did there ;). So I will ask you to help me out with something. Please show me an example, literally any example in any major sport, of a top 5 talent being traded in a closed negotiation. Literally only accepting offers from a single team. Show me that and we can talk.

I had multiple conversations with others on "only accepting offers from a single team". I just don't think that is true. At least UTA knew and I am sure Ainge had put some counter proposal on the table. You can blame Nico for his fixation on Davis but I am sure they had look at other offers.

I also think Lakers are in the Fox discussion. So it's either Knecht + Reaves + 2 1st. for Fox or Davis + 1st for Luka. So, Lakers had some leverage. I don't think it's a coincidence the Fox trade comes out right after Luka trade.


Nico said he only talked to the Lakers. Source below.

Read on Twitter
?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1886129765825798497%7Ctwgr%5Ec46ce800bca9a2b81ba42b258a61658df16ca045%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fsports.yahoo.com%2Fno-matter-how-you-look-at-it-the-mavs-process-in-dealing-luka-doncic-makes-little-sense-201815743.html
moss_is_1
RealGM
Posts: 10,971
And1: 2,385
Joined: May 20, 2009
   

Re: Around the NBA (Part Two) 

Post#813 » by moss_is_1 » Tue Feb 4, 2025 12:59 am

BlacJacMac wrote:CBS Sports:
The last nine months represented a real chance for the Bulls to reset and build this thing properly. In that span, they failed to net a single first-round pick for Caruso, DeRozan or LaVine aside from one they could've kept by simply losing more games.

They're gonna be pretty screwed for awhile now. They should flip Ball, Vucevic, White, Jalen Smith, Dosunmu while they might have value. Vucevic is having a career resurgence over 40% from 3 on 4.6 attempts after 3 rough shooting seasons.

The Ball and Jalen Smith for Randle trade has some intrigue if Ball is really gonna be able to ever play at a high level. White is interesting for sure.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,539
And1: 19,632
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Around the NBA (Part Two) 

Post#814 » by shrink » Tue Feb 4, 2025 1:29 am

TimberKat wrote:I had multiple conversations with others on "only accepting offers from a single team". I just don't think that is true. At least UTA knew and I am sure Ainge had put some counter proposal on the table.

I heard today that DAL talked to Ainge didn’t even know! Nico talked to Ainge earlier in the week before, and all Danny knew was his part, where he’d take on salary in exchange for the two seconds. They only let him know the whole trade hours before it happened, and at a point where he couldn’t foul the trade. Just crazy secrecy!
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,774
And1: 5,269
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: Around the NBA (Part Two) 

Post#815 » by minimus » Wed Feb 5, 2025 9:17 am

Read on Twitter


Toumani Camara stock is rising... I have been his fan since draft...
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,539
And1: 19,632
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Around the NBA (Part Two) 

Post#816 » by shrink » Wed Feb 5, 2025 2:36 pm

BlacJacMac wrote:A "fun" comment from Canis:

It's just a matter of time before there's a swap of two impending supermax players, so the teams can keep the price down. I.e. here comes the Banchero-Holmgren trade saving each team $117M.


I love that!

What’s ironic is that the supermax rule was created thinking it would help small market teams retain their superstars. The NBA thought that if the home team could offer 35%, and all the others could only offer 30%, it would give small market teams a tool to keep their stars from heading to big market teams when they approached free agency. The problem though is that small market teams struggle to pay 35%, plus go far enough into the lux to build a contender with that star. This is even more true now that apron rules further strangle teams financially. Since its inception, we have seen the rule have the opposite of its intended effect. Ever since Boogie Cousins, small market teams end up trading their players to big markets (LAL, NYK) who have high revenues and can afford to pay superstars 35%.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,674
And1: 23,024
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Around the NBA (Part Two) 

Post#817 » by Klomp » Wed Feb 5, 2025 2:44 pm

shrink wrote:
BlacJacMac wrote:A "fun" comment from Canis:

It's just a matter of time before there's a swap of two impending supermax players, so the teams can keep the price down. I.e. here comes the Banchero-Holmgren trade saving each team $117M.


I love that!

What’s ironic is that the supermax rule was created thinking it would help small market teams retain their superstars. The NBA thought that if the home team could offer 35%, and all the others could only offer 30%, it would give small market teams a tool to keep their stars from heading to big market teams when they approached free agency. The problem though is that small market teams struggle to pay 35%, plus go far enough into the lux to build a contender with that star. This is even more true now that apron rules further strangle teams financially. Since its inception, we have seen the rule have the opposite of its intended effect. Ever since Boogie Cousins, small market teams end up trading their players to big markets (LAL, NYK) who have high revenues and can afford to pay superstars 35%.

I think one thing that feeds into this though is the small-minded owners who care more about the bottom line than they do about fielding a good team. Heck, I think Denver could have won a minimum of one more title with the main core that Connelly built, but Kroenke - while wealthy - uses the Nuggets as a money-maker while his true passion is the LA Rams.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,539
And1: 19,632
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Around the NBA (Part Two) 

Post#818 » by shrink » Wed Feb 5, 2025 3:07 pm

https://dailyknicks.com/new-york-knicks-may-finally-have-reason-regret-karl-anthony-towns-trade

Knicks could regret trading for Towns, because they may have gotten Luka Doncic for Randle!

Oh, entitled Knicks fans …!
TimberKat
Head Coach
Posts: 6,133
And1: 3,087
Joined: Jul 02, 2022
         

Re: Around the NBA (Part Two) 

Post#819 » by TimberKat » Wed Feb 5, 2025 5:28 pm

shrink wrote:https://dailyknicks.com/new-york-knicks-may-finally-have-reason-regret-karl-anthony-towns-trade

Knicks could regret trading for Towns, because they may have gotten Luka Doncic for Randle!

Oh, entitled Knicks fans …!

:lol: :lol: :lol: There is already rumors NYK will swamp Towns for Jokic. It's like Nico would target Randle over Davis? :crazy:
Guest84
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,827
And1: 893
Joined: Dec 13, 2017
 

Re: Around the NBA (Part Two) 

Post#820 » by Guest84 » Wed Feb 5, 2025 5:32 pm

Question...Shrink, this might be for you.

I heard on TNT that since Luka got traded, he's no longer eligible for the supermax deal even though he met the qualifications for it. Is this valid?

Candance Parker stated that this might be a way for teams to get out of paying the supermax and that it might be something that will need to be addressed with the next CBA.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves