ImageImageImage

Trade Talk (Part 16): Early Season Anxiety Edition

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

User avatar
_AIJ_
RealGM
Posts: 14,144
And1: 4,635
Joined: Oct 15, 2008
     

Re: Trade Talk (Part 16): Early Season Anxiety Edition 

Post#1581 » by _AIJ_ » Wed Feb 5, 2025 9:11 pm

Id rather do Ball and Smith. Hope conley retires then resign Lonzo and he can back up Rob next year
LETS GO WOLVES!!! 8-)
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,483
And1: 19,560
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Trade Talk (Part 1[emoji239[emoji2392]]): Early Season Anxiety Edition 

Post#1582 » by shrink » Wed Feb 5, 2025 9:28 pm

shangrila wrote:What changed? The CBA. The Gobert trade was done prior to the newest CBA.

A lot of people on this board seem unwilling to admit that they overrated KAT's value. If there were significantly better trades out there they would have been made, but there weren't. And for as good as KAT is he has an equal number of drawbacks, whether that's defensively (worst rim protector in the league this year), health or contract.

The deal was a soft reboot around Ant. The effect of it, good or bad, was always a long term thing. It can't be judged definitively at this time.

Nice post.

I think we were all shocked by the KAT trade, but we weren’t just trading KAT, we were trading KAT on a supermax. NYK was reportedly the most interested for the longest time, so I think this was probably the best offer. If KAT got hurt again, he’d be untradeable. I think Connelly took us out of the supermax business before other GMs did the same, and caused fans to realize just how limiting apron rules are.
BlacJacMac
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,884
And1: 3,565
Joined: Aug 25, 2020
       

Re: Trade Talk (Part 16): Early Season Anxiety Edition 

Post#1583 » by BlacJacMac » Wed Feb 5, 2025 9:30 pm

_AIJ_ wrote:Id rather do Ball and Smith. Hope conley retires then resign Lonzo and he can back up Rob next year


What I love about Ball is with his size and defensive flexibility you can play him with Ant, Rob, Donte, Clark...
User avatar
Domejandro
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 20,528
And1: 30,961
Joined: Jul 29, 2014

Re: Trade Talk (Part 16): Early Season Anxiety Edition 

Post#1584 » by Domejandro » Wed Feb 5, 2025 9:41 pm

cmoss84 wrote:How about a trade that gives us Haliburton AND Ant??? And we keep Jaden, NAZ AND Rudy?!?!? Too good to be true??? Check it out.

Ind OUT: Haliburton, Jarace Walker, Johnny Furphy
Ind IN: Butler, DD, NAW, '25 SRP (Utah), '25 FRP (Det)
McConnell-Nembhard-DD-Mathurin-NAW-Butler-Nesmith-Sheppard-Siakam-Toppin-Turner
Starting 5: Nembhard/DD/Butler/Siakam/Turner

Mia OUT: Butler
Mia IN: Randle, Walker, Furphy
Rozier-Burks-Herro-Highsmith-Jovic-JJJ-Robinson-Randle-Bam-Ware
Starting 5: Rozier/Herro/Robinson/Randle/Bam

MN OUT: Randle, DD, NAW, '25 SRP (Utah), '25 FRP (Det)
MN IN: Haliburton
PG- Haliburton/Mike/RD
SG- Ant/FA/Clark/TSJ
SF- Jaden/Naz/Minott/Ingles
PF- Naz/FA/Miller
C- Rudy/FA/Garza
Starting 5: Haliburton/Ant/Jaden/Naz/Rudy

Value is pretty brutal for Indiana, but even with that aside, this isn’t a legal trade (aggregating salaries while staying above the Second Apron).
cmoss84
Pro Prospect
Posts: 962
And1: 330
Joined: Jan 06, 2022

Re: Trade Talk (Part 16): Early Season Anxiety Edition 

Post#1585 » by cmoss84 » Wed Feb 5, 2025 10:38 pm

Domejandro wrote:
cmoss84 wrote:How about a trade that gives us Haliburton AND Ant??? And we keep Jaden, NAZ AND Rudy?!?!? Too good to be true??? Check it out.

Ind OUT: Haliburton, Jarace Walker, Johnny Furphy
Ind IN: Butler, DD, NAW, '25 SRP (Utah), '25 FRP (Det)
McConnell-Nembhard-DD-Mathurin-NAW-Butler-Nesmith-Sheppard-Siakam-Toppin-Turner
Starting 5: Nembhard/DD/Butler/Siakam/Turner

Mia OUT: Butler
Mia IN: Randle, Walker, Furphy
Rozier-Burks-Herro-Highsmith-Jovic-JJJ-Robinson-Randle-Bam-Ware
Starting 5: Rozier/Herro/Robinson/Randle/Bam

MN OUT: Randle, DD, NAW, '25 SRP (Utah), '25 FRP (Det)
MN IN: Haliburton
PG- Haliburton/Mike/RD
SG- Ant/FA/Clark/TSJ
SF- Jaden/Naz/Minott/Ingles
PF- Naz/FA/Miller
C- Rudy/FA/Garza
Starting 5: Haliburton/Ant/Jaden/Naz/Rudy

Value is pretty brutal for Indiana, but even with that aside, this isn’t a legal trade (aggregating salaries while staying above the Second Apron).


Maybe you are right with the Indiana bit...to me, it makes them a better team short & long term.

You can aggregate as long as you end up under 2nd apron (I think this is discussed every day on here :o ). I used the spotrac trade machine...
I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy.
Folklore
Pro Prospect
Posts: 856
And1: 253
Joined: Jun 13, 2017
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 16): Early Season Anxiety Edition 

Post#1586 » by Folklore » Wed Feb 5, 2025 10:45 pm

There's no trade that's going to save this team because no team is getting rid of their players that show real potential. I think that teams are going to want scouts that know what they're doing from now on because now owners are really watching out for the new taxes. Last year was a our chance to get rid of Rudy because there were teams willing to take salary and didn't see the chance coming. The only thing left to do now is trade talent we have for picks in hopes for better talent through the draft. And also get rid of Finch for a coach who knows how to develop talent because that's our best option.

TC didn't have a real end game and this is the result. He's as bad as Nico Harrison.
younggunsmn
Head Coach
Posts: 6,830
And1: 2,668
Joined: May 28, 2007
Location: Hiding from the thought police.

Re: Trade Talk (Part 1[emoji239[emoji2392]]): Early Season Anxiety Edition 

Post#1587 » by younggunsmn » Wed Feb 5, 2025 11:32 pm

shangrila wrote:
Slim Tubby wrote:
shrink wrote:One of the biggest advantages for us to keep Anthony Edwards in Minnesota is because Anthony Edwards wants to be in Minnesota.

I think Ant is already a better player than Haliburton, and with the huge athletic gap between them, his ceiling is so much higher. But even if we were offered a superior player (say, Luka Doncic?), I am not sure MIN trades Ant because of the huge risk that the player doesn’t want to be in Minnesota and walks for nothing.
KAT wanted to stay in MIN. We even traded a league generation of FRPs for Gobert to pair with Karl to create a unique advantage. A year later, we abandon this strategy and move Karl for absolute ****.

Why did we do this? What changed following our greatest season in 20 years? Was Connelly unaware that he could review our Salary Cap structure farther than six (6) months out?

I can't think of a worse scenario for an NBA team than having your GM, on the last year of their contract, making long-term decisions for the franchise.

Tim Connelly can **** off right along with our ownership. The ultimate cost of his actions will be the loss of Ant. The road to his departure has already been paved.

With that said, I DO appreciate your efforts to remain positive. It's a rare quality these days and admirable...but sometimes a guy just needs to read the room and accept what his eyes are telling him.

Sent from my N152DL using RealGM mobile app

What changed? The CBA. The Gobert trade was done prior to the newest CBA.

A lot of people on this board seem unwilling to admit that they overrated KAT's value. If there were significantly better trades out there they would have been made, but there weren't. And for as good as KAT is he has an equal number of drawbacks, whether that's defensively (worst rim protector in the league this year), health or contract.

The deal was a soft reboot around Ant. The effect of it, good or bad, was always a long term thing. It can't be judged definitively at this time.


This is wrong on so many levels.
1. This franchise in this market was NEVER going to maintain such a high level of salary for more than a year or two, luxury tax, new CBA or no. Adding Gobert to a supermax and soon to be supermax player was either a short term gamble or ridiculously shortsighted decsion by Connelly.

2. TC traded 5 first round picks for Gobert whose on court presence destroyed KAT's value by forcing him to be a perimeter player only.

3. TC then traded KAT and the primary return was Julius Randle, who we likely can't even get an expiring contract for.

4. To get out of 4 years of KAT we took on 2 years of Julius Randle, who also has a substantial injury history, which was absolutely a moronic thing to do and is likely to cost us Naz this summer.
For a supposed salary dump trade we are getting little to no savings for half of his remaining contract.

5. KAT has a shot at first team All-NBA this year if he can remain healthy.
He was once rated the most valuable trade asset in the entire league and is still in his prime at 29 years old.
His team is on a pace to be 6 or 7 wins better and the team he left is on a pace to be 10 wins worse and that could get even worse.

Lets call the KAT trade what it really is, Tim Connelly being a terrible judge of fit and talent.
He has a coach who plays a 5 out system and since he's arrived he has traded 5 1st round picks and an All-NBA talent in his prime for Rudy Gobert and a ball pounding PF who is most effective playing like a bulldozer.

Were we going to get fair value for KAT? Maybe. Maybe not.
But the best path forward was always letting KAT be KAT and getting the most out of our supermax player.
That became impossible once he traded for Gobert, so his first mistake is what caused the 2nd.
BlacJacMac
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,884
And1: 3,565
Joined: Aug 25, 2020
       

Re: Trade Talk (Part 16): Early Season Anxiety Edition 

Post#1588 » by BlacJacMac » Thu Feb 6, 2025 12:22 am

Lonzo Ball is also OUT tonight due to "Left Knee; Injury Management," though it's likely he's on the trade block before tomorrow's deadline.
FrenchMinnyFan
Starter
Posts: 2,072
And1: 1,271
Joined: Feb 10, 2023
     

Re: Trade Talk (Part 16): Early Season Anxiety Edition 

Post#1589 » by FrenchMinnyFan » Thu Feb 6, 2025 12:55 am

Funny how people overreacting here. We make a WCF , things that we have to wait very long to make and one more trade ( okay a bad one, KAT), some here pretend that we are done, bad, should tanking next year.... what a joke. We are not that far from our last year level. Trading Randle for a good PG and a back up C and here we are. It's more easy to do it on paper than in the real NBA world but things are not as bad as some people here tell.
Neeva
General Manager
Posts: 7,538
And1: 2,912
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: Trade Talk (Part 16): Early Season Anxiety Edition 

Post#1590 » by Neeva » Thu Feb 6, 2025 1:09 am

FrenchMinnyFan wrote:Funny how people overreacting here. We make a WCF , things that we have to wait very long to make and one more trade ( okay a bad one, KAT), some here pretend that we are done, bad, should tanking next year.... what a joke. We are not that far from our last year level. Trading Randle for a good PG and a back up C and here we are. It's more easy to do it on paper than in the real NBA world but things are not as bad as some people here tell.


It’s the same clowns that were saying Kessler was better than Rudy a year and a half ago lol don’t listen to them they are always wrong, and it will be funny in a year in a half more to see how wrong.
Baseline81
Analyst
Posts: 3,276
And1: 1,909
Joined: Jan 18, 2009

Re: Trade Talk (Part 16): Early Season Anxiety Edition 

Post#1591 » by Baseline81 » Thu Feb 6, 2025 1:51 am

Neeva wrote:
FrenchMinnyFan wrote:Funny how people overreacting here. We make a WCF , things that we have to wait very long to make and one more trade ( okay a bad one, KAT), some here pretend that we are done, bad, should tanking next year.... what a joke. We are not that far from our last year level. Trading Randle for a good PG and a back up C and here we are. It's more easy to do it on paper than in the real NBA world but things are not as bad as some people here tell.


It’s the same clowns that were saying Kessler was better than Rudy a year and a half ago lol don’t listen to them they are always wrong, and it will be funny in a year in a half more to see how wrong.

Wrong, I was against the trade for Gobert because of the amount of first round picks in the package. It had nothing to do with Kessler, especially since I wasn't a fan of selecting him in that draft.

For FrenchMinnyFan to gloss over the "okay a bad one, KAT" is understating it. As if it's easy to trade Randle, who has less value than Towns, for a good PG and backup C. Take the blue-tinted glass off please.

Again, team chemistry/cohesion is such a massive benefit. And to make that deal right before training camp...
LibertyPrime
Starter
Posts: 2,314
And1: 1,972
Joined: Dec 08, 2013
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 16): Early Season Anxiety Edition 

Post#1592 » by LibertyPrime » Thu Feb 6, 2025 2:05 am

SloMo goes to Miami as part of the Butler deal. Wonder if they're intent on keeping him.... I'd like to see him back but I might be alone in that regard.
"The last domino falls here!"
Ethomasp31
Pro Prospect
Posts: 852
And1: 367
Joined: Jul 11, 2014
       

Re: Trade Talk (Part 16): Early Season Anxiety Edition 

Post#1593 » by Ethomasp31 » Thu Feb 6, 2025 2:29 am

BlacJacMac wrote:Lonzo Ball is also OUT tonight due to "Left Knee; Injury Management," though it's likely he's on the trade block before tomorrow's deadline.


ESPN had an update that he is signing a 2 year $20 extension with Chicago.
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,362
And1: 5,907
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Trade Talk (Part 16): Early Season Anxiety Edition 

Post#1594 » by winforlose » Thu Feb 6, 2025 5:28 am

Ethomasp31 wrote:
BlacJacMac wrote:Lonzo Ball is also OUT tonight due to "Left Knee; Injury Management," though it's likely he's on the trade block before tomorrow's deadline.


ESPN had an update that he is signing a 2 year $20 extension with Chicago.


Jack Borman who used to run Canis and does locked on post casts said he believes that extension does not make Lonzo trade ineligible. He also speculated that it might be a precursor to a trade of Randle for Ball and Smith. I hate the idea, but at least the 2nd year is a team option, so we won’t be totally destroyed by it, just badly damaged.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,616
And1: 22,976
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part 16): Early Season Anxiety Edition 

Post#1595 » by Klomp » Thu Feb 6, 2025 5:35 am

winforlose wrote:
Ethomasp31 wrote:
BlacJacMac wrote:Lonzo Ball is also OUT tonight due to "Left Knee; Injury Management," though it's likely he's on the trade block before tomorrow's deadline.


ESPN had an update that he is signing a 2 year $20 extension with Chicago.


Jack Borman who used to run Canis and does locked on post casts said he believes that extension does not make Lonzo trade ineligible. He also speculated that it might be a precursor to a trade of Randle for Ball and Smith. I hate the idea, but at least the 2nd year is a team option, so we won’t be totally destroyed by it, just badly damaged.

Here is what he retweeted.

Read on Twitter


Spotrac disagrees, for whatever it's worth.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,362
And1: 5,907
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Trade Talk (Part 16): Early Season Anxiety Edition 

Post#1596 » by winforlose » Thu Feb 6, 2025 5:45 am

Klomp wrote:
winforlose wrote:
Ethomasp31 wrote:
ESPN had an update that he is signing a 2 year $20 extension with Chicago.


Jack Borman who used to run Canis and does locked on post casts said he believes that extension does not make Lonzo trade ineligible. He also speculated that it might be a precursor to a trade of Randle for Ball and Smith. I hate the idea, but at least the 2nd year is a team option, so we won’t be totally destroyed by it, just badly damaged.

Here is what he retweeted.

Read on Twitter


Spotrac disagrees, for whatever it's worth.


The math would be complicated and might require a third team. But I would give the Bulls Randle, NAW, Minott, and the Utah 2nd for Smith and White. Bulls either let Randle walk or trade him as an expiring, get an interesting young player in Minott, a high 2nd and NAW for Smith and White. It might not seem like much, but it is mostly consistent with the trade values from this cycle.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,616
And1: 22,976
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part 16): Early Season Anxiety Edition 

Post#1597 » by Klomp » Thu Feb 6, 2025 5:51 am

I do wonder what the plan is for Coby White in Chicago.

Lonzo Ball (just extended)
Ayo Dosunmo
Josh Giddey
Kevin Huerter (just acquired)
Tre Jones (just acquired)

I wouldn't hate a White/Williams package for Randle, even though it's future money....
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,760
And1: 5,248
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 1[emoji239[emoji2392]]): Early Season Anxiety Edition 

Post#1598 » by minimus » Thu Feb 6, 2025 6:14 am

Klomp wrote:I do wonder what the plan is for Coby White in Chicago.

Lonzo Ball (just extended)
Ayo Dosunmo
Josh Giddey
Kevin Huerter (just acquired)
Tre Jones (just acquired)

I wouldn't hate a White/Williams package for Randle, even though it's future money....

Everytime I watch Pat Williams playing he is awful. Not worth NBA min.deal, let alone 18 mil
thinktank
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,303
And1: 2,641
Joined: Jul 02, 2010
Location: Mpls

Re: Trade Talk (Part 16): Early Season Anxiety Edition 

Post#1599 » by thinktank » Thu Feb 6, 2025 7:04 am

Bulls didn’t trade LaVine to then trade White.
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,362
And1: 5,907
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Trade Talk (Part 16): Early Season Anxiety Edition 

Post#1600 » by winforlose » Thu Feb 6, 2025 7:21 am

thinktank wrote:Bulls didn’t trade LaVine to then trade White.


One would think, but who knows what the Bulls are actually doing. If they are blowing it up (seems likely,) then they should move White, and Randle as a 30 million expiring would be a good vehicle to get bad contracts next season along with some picks.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves