Post#412 » by ontnut » Thu Feb 6, 2025 6:07 am
I don't love Ingram, and I would've preferred we kept the IND pick because I am one of those who are quite down on Indy. That said, the pick was likely in the 15 range ish at best (unless of course IND wins the lotto). As long as the protections are there against top 4 lotto win, the cost isn't that high.
The fit...it's not perfect, but there's no arguing that Ingram increases our talent level. He's still young enough that he can be traded again down the line if things don't work out.
Getting Ingram for spare parts,which we were not really getting much for, or in Olynyk's case, maybe have to pay to get off him, a (protected) 1st, and a 2nd is hard to argue against in terms of sheer acquisition cost. The big question as noted in the thread is what we will be paying to keep him around. If it's $35m per, fine. If we're going into $40m territory...I'll feel less good about it.
At the end of the day, we came out ahead, in theory, on the Siakam trade. I kinda view this in the light of the Norm trade, where we got a "similar" player (at the time), in GTJ who was several years younger. Ingram can do 85% of what Siakam can, and then on top of that we got some depth and picks we used to round out our roster with young talent. Given that I've always said we're not an organization that full on tanks, esp not for multiple years, I think what we got NET out of the OG/Siakam trades, you cannot be upset.
