neiLz wrote:Yo can we chip in for an upgraded server or server space for realgm? its been 20 years and this site breaks every draft and trade deadline. wtf.
So its good 99,5% of time?
Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis
neiLz wrote:Yo can we chip in for an upgraded server or server space for realgm? its been 20 years and this site breaks every draft and trade deadline. wtf.
LittleRooster wrote:I was watching nbatv last night and Chris Haynes was on. He said if the bucks don’t make a deep championship run there will be major change in the off season. I took it as a message from Dame wanting out but who knows
LittleRooster wrote:I was watching nbatv last night and Chris Haynes was on. He said if the bucks don’t make a deep championship run there will be major change in the off season. I took it as a message from Dame wanting out but who knows
Sigra wrote:neiLz wrote:Yo can we chip in for an upgraded server or server space for realgm? its been 20 years and this site breaks every draft and trade deadline. wtf.
So its good 99,5% of time?
engelmartin wrote:ShootingtheJ wrote:htr wrote:What about Portis to Indiana for Nembhard and Toppin?
Pacers have a ton of buyers remorse after giving Toppin a big extension after his Tim Thomas style playoff run. We could move Pat in this deal, get Nesmith, or throw in all draft capital for Mathurin.
I like Nembhard too, but he's one of their few they're not shopping.
I think Nembhard is the reason Mathurin is expendable
fansinceforever wrote:I mean, I've been one of the loudest proponents of trading Middleton for a while but it's very hard to argue that we're better than we yesterday. Even with all of his injury issues.
If they don't have another deal lined up, this is failure.
MickeyDavis wrote:Critiquing moves that have been made is valid. Blasting Horst (and I'm no fan of his) for not doing more moves is dumb. Unless you can tell us what specific offers were on the table that Horst turned down or what offers Horst put out there that other teams turned down, no one has a clue.
MickeyDavis wrote:Critiquing moves that have been made is valid. Blasting Horst (and I'm no fan of his) for not doing more moves is dumb. Unless you can tell us what specific offers were on the table that Horst turned down or what offers Horst put out there that other teams turned down, no one has a clue.
dedned wrote:MickeyDavis wrote:Critiquing moves that have been made is valid. Blasting Horst (and I'm no fan of his) for not doing more moves is dumb. Unless you can tell us what specific offers were on the table that Horst turned down or what offers Horst put out there that other teams turned down, no one has a clue.
Well if the whole point of the first move is to do a second move and that doesn't happen, he needs an ass blasting.
MVP2110 wrote:if that's it for the Bucks
Dame/Rollins
Green/Trent/Pat C
Kuz/Ajax/Marjon/Livingston
Giannis/Prince/T. Smith
Brook/Bobby/Sims
Biggest risk would be the lack of ball handling if Dame or Rollins went down imo
MVP2110 wrote:if that's it for the Bucks
Dame/Rollins
Green/Trent/Pat C
Kuz/Ajax/Marjon/Livingston
Giannis/Prince/T. Smith
Brook/Bobby/Sims
Biggest risk would be the lack of ball handling if Dame or Rollins went down imo
Ron Swanson wrote:I can't imagine we're dumb enough to view Kuzma as primarily a SF when he hasn't been one since his last season in LA. But Doc's our coach so yeah, he probably sees no issue rolling out a Dame/Andre/Kuzma/Giannis/Brook starting-5. We're the second best 3PT shooting team in the league and instead of leaning into that, we're gonna trot out a 5-man lineup straight out of the early 2000's NBA. Just too many stupid people involved in the decision-making process right now.
Sigra wrote:neiLz wrote:Yo can we chip in for an upgraded server or server space for realgm? its been 20 years and this site breaks every draft and trade deadline. wtf.
So its good 99,5% of time?
German Athens wrote:What about Norm?