Image ImageImage Image

Which front office would you rather have running this team?

Moderators: HomoSapien, Ice Man, Michael Jackson, dougthonus, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10

Who would you pick to run this team?

GarPax (2011-2020)
60
88%
AKME (2020-Present)
8
12%
 
Total votes: 68

jnrjr79
Head Coach
Posts: 6,863
And1: 4,091
Joined: May 27, 2003
Location: Chicago

Re: Which front office would you rather have running this team? 

Post#21 » by jnrjr79 » Fri Feb 7, 2025 3:14 am

Pax solo > GarPax > AKME

I thought the Lonzo extension was a great deal, and the LaVine trade was just fine (and a relative win after a couple of years where it appeared you’d need to attach assets to move him). That said, his overall performance has been so dismal that this is not a difficult question.

The one thing you could say about GarPax - they rarely put a team in a deep hole that would be tough to recover from. That’s precisely what AKME have done.
PistolP
Analyst
Posts: 3,266
And1: 387
Joined: Sep 13, 2011

Re: Which front office would you rather have running this team? 

Post#22 » by PistolP » Fri Feb 7, 2025 3:37 am

GarPax all day. I watched the presser today and wow, AK just comes off as a total clown. Even more so than normal. He’s in wayyyy over his head and it’s so obvious. Hiring him has easily been one of the worst moves the franchise has ever done. Unfortunately I have zero faith that the Reinsdorf’s care enough to replace him.

Since AK got here, he’s basically given up Gafford, Lauri, Franz Wagner, Lavine, multiple second round picks, and our 2024 lottery pick for what has amounted to basically nothing. His first round picks have been bench caliber talent. We have no promising young talent other than Matas. Our cap situation is just mediocre. And barring some lottery magic, we are probably locked into another late lotto pick for 2025.

The level of incompetence year after year after year is just disgusting and hard to deal with as a fan.

Game threads on RealGM used to roll pages and pages deep. Now half the city literally can’t watch the games and the other half has no reason to waste their time watching this garbage product. They’ve literally run this franchise to the ground.

Hoping this is rock bottom…
Dez
General Manager
Posts: 7,778
And1: 9,353
Joined: Jul 23, 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
 

Re: Which front office would you rather have running this team? 

Post#23 » by Dez » Fri Feb 7, 2025 3:58 am

Gee I wonder who voted for AKME?
MrSparkle
RealGM
Posts: 23,474
And1: 11,255
Joined: Jul 31, 2003
Location: chicago

Re: Which front office would you rather have running this team? 

Post#24 » by MrSparkle » Fri Feb 7, 2025 4:00 am

Well, would've bet $100 on AK in 2021.

Last 3y, gimme GarPax.

MarcTuras has brought greater new levels of apathy.

They managed to make me a Lakers fan! I'm so uninterested in this directionless Bulls roster, that I am excited by the secret-Silver-assembled Lakers. Luka, twilight-uncle Bron, Mark Williams the human pogo stick...

Long lost the Bulls stress... becoming a casual Lakers fan is nice and easy.
User avatar
SalmonsSuperfan
Veteran
Posts: 2,796
And1: 2,432
Joined: Feb 14, 2019
 

Re: Which front office would you rather have running this team? 

Post#25 » by SalmonsSuperfan » Fri Feb 7, 2025 4:25 am

I love how lopsided this poll is. Everyone agrees. Paxson was genuinely very good at his job. Gar had “connections” but they were the wrong connections. Karnisovas offers literally nothing. Micheal hired the dumbest guy from that front office. AK is probably very good at speaking and Michael is a nepo baby who likes smoke being blown up his butt.

I liked the idea of hiring new management, it was time to move on, but they hired the wrong guy and staff. AK and co has proven to be worse at the job. I’m not sure how to distinguish between pax and gar, we used to talk about how we respected the pax part of the equation. But that duo seemingly made good draft/roster decisions. There’s a bit here “pax bullsica” or something. There was a peace between the championship era and today. I was a big fan of the peace, I was raised on it in lieu of MJ, but I can’t even watch these AK-constructed teams. They finally traded the last guy worth watching from a simpler/better generation.
Onibuh
Senior
Posts: 696
And1: 225
Joined: Jun 23, 2017
       

Re: Which front office would you rather have running this team? 

Post#26 » by Onibuh » Fri Feb 7, 2025 6:43 am

It was time to move on. I don't think I want AK with this upcoming roster and Cap Space in 2026 (if he can manage to keep it). Pax without Gar should be the answer here.
The Explorer
RealGM
Posts: 10,801
And1: 3,361
Joined: Jul 11, 2005

Re: Which front office would you rather have running this team? 

Post#27 » by The Explorer » Fri Feb 7, 2025 6:53 am

Bulls were a laughing stock with Boylen and trash. Bulls are a laughing stock now. It doesn't matter because the same incompetent ownership remains.
User avatar
Jcool0
RealGM
Posts: 15,473
And1: 9,382
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
Location: Illinois
         

Re: Which front office would you rather have running this team? 

Post#28 » by Jcool0 » Fri Feb 7, 2025 7:01 am

I voted for Gary/Pax but they stilled sucked and anyone who told you otherwise is lying.
User avatar
Jcool0
RealGM
Posts: 15,473
And1: 9,382
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
Location: Illinois
         

Re: Which front office would you rather have running this team? 

Post#29 » by Jcool0 » Fri Feb 7, 2025 7:10 am

Dan Z wrote:
Dominator83 wrote:This franchise is in considerably worse shape now than when they took over. They had Zach on an absolute bargain of a contract , Coby with 3 years left on his rookie deal, Markkanen with a year left on his, and the #4 pick in the upcoming draft. Didn't have a draft surplus , but also didn't owe any future 1sts either.

Now our only young guy with any kind of value is Buzelis ,and maybe Jalen Smith but hard to see when he barely gets any minutes to show it. Coby perhaps. Just now finally being debt-free on 1st rounders, until we probably unload another batch for guys like PG and Randle ! Not for real needle movers and young stud 23 year old bigs like the Lakers do. Nah. Let's blow our wads on B-listers that might get us an 8 seed one of these days.


I also think GarPax probably drafts Haliburton instead of PW because they liked players from Iowa. That one move would've changed everything.


There was a group of posters here that advocated for Haliburton at the time, but the Gar/Pax special was to take Obi Toppin.
Dan Z
RealGM
Posts: 18,666
And1: 9,269
Joined: Feb 19, 2002
Location: Chicago
 

Re: Which front office would you rather have running this team? 

Post#30 » by Dan Z » Fri Feb 7, 2025 7:18 am

Jcool0 wrote:
Dan Z wrote:
Dominator83 wrote:This franchise is in considerably worse shape now than when they took over. They had Zach on an absolute bargain of a contract , Coby with 3 years left on his rookie deal, Markkanen with a year left on his, and the #4 pick in the upcoming draft. Didn't have a draft surplus , but also didn't owe any future 1sts either.

Now our only young guy with any kind of value is Buzelis ,and maybe Jalen Smith but hard to see when he barely gets any minutes to show it. Coby perhaps. Just now finally being debt-free on 1st rounders, until we probably unload another batch for guys like PG and Randle ! Not for real needle movers and young stud 23 year old bigs like the Lakers do. Nah. Let's blow our wads on B-listers that might get us an 8 seed one of these days.


I also think GarPax probably drafts Haliburton instead of PW because they liked players from Iowa. That one move would've changed everything.


There was a group of posters here that advocated for Haliburton at the time, but the Gar/Pax special was to take Obi Toppin.


Toppin wouldve been better than Patrick Willisms of the past few years.
Dez
General Manager
Posts: 7,778
And1: 9,353
Joined: Jul 23, 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
 

Re: Which front office would you rather have running this team? 

Post#31 » by Dez » Fri Feb 7, 2025 8:14 am

I know 2 of the 3 that voted AKME, fess up who was the 3rd?
step
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,538
And1: 521
Joined: Nov 14, 2006

Re: Which front office would you rather have running this team? 

Post#32 » by step » Fri Feb 7, 2025 11:08 am

As dysfunctional GarPax duo was, they at least were more responsive and adaptable to change. Even during the time there was the power struggle, change were made. Not always the right ones, but they atleast tried to keep moving.

AK largely has been a deer stuck in the headlights.
User avatar
coldfish
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 60,820
And1: 38,215
Joined: Jun 11, 2004
Location: Right in the middle
   

Re: Which front office would you rather have running this team? 

Post#33 » by coldfish » Fri Feb 7, 2025 11:30 am

With Garpax 2011-2020 you had a plan. You had hope. You also had the complete confidence that they would screw it up.

With AKME, there is no plan. There is no hope.

I'll take Garpax but this is like saying I would take chlamydia over syphilis.
User avatar
DASMACKDOWN
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 30,456
And1: 15,681
Joined: Nov 01, 2001
Location: Cookin' with Derrick Rose

Re: Which front office would you rather have running this team? 

Post#34 » by DASMACKDOWN » Fri Feb 7, 2025 11:53 am

The correct answer is neither.

GarPax were TERRIBLE. They never made moves to improve the team but at least you knew they value draft picks.

AKME is TERRIBLE not only because of moves but also non moves. AK is also a terrible communicator, so you have no idea what he values.

But to answer outside of the poll, I would rather have Pax and not GarPax.
User avatar
dougthonus
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 59,053
And1: 19,123
Joined: Dec 22, 2004
Contact:
 

Re: Which front office would you rather have running this team? 

Post#35 » by dougthonus » Fri Feb 7, 2025 12:01 pm

Jcool0 wrote:There was a group of posters here that advocated for Haliburton at the time, but the Gar/Pax special was to take Obi Toppin.


I don't know if they'd have taken Haliburton, but he was their exact type of player, and that insanely close ties to Iowa St. Toppin was most definitely not their MO for player type. I would have pegged them as taking Haliburton, Vassell, or maybe Advija in terms of guys I think would have fit their pattern.
User avatar
dougthonus
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 59,053
And1: 19,123
Joined: Dec 22, 2004
Contact:
 

Re: Which front office would you rather have running this team? 

Post#36 » by dougthonus » Fri Feb 7, 2025 12:05 pm

coldfish wrote:With Garpax 2011-2020 you had a plan. You had hope. You also had the complete confidence that they would screw it up.

With AKME, there is no plan. There is no hope.

I'll take Garpax but this is like saying I would take chlamydia over syphilis.


I think it's more like taking a cold over cancer.

Still, no one wants a cold.
User avatar
coldfish
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 60,820
And1: 38,215
Joined: Jun 11, 2004
Location: Right in the middle
   

Re: Which front office would you rather have running this team? 

Post#37 » by coldfish » Fri Feb 7, 2025 12:23 pm

dougthonus wrote:
coldfish wrote:With Garpax 2011-2020 you had a plan. You had hope. You also had the complete confidence that they would screw it up.

With AKME, there is no plan. There is no hope.

I'll take Garpax but this is like saying I would take chlamydia over syphilis.


I think it's more like taking a cold over cancer.

Still, no one wants a cold.


GarPax was never going to succeed as they operated during that period. Between the political issues and the poor talent evaluation, they were just going to be a neverending series of 30-40 win seasons. It would just be 30-40 wins seasons with hope, instead of what we have now.
League Circles
RealGM
Posts: 35,693
And1: 10,125
Joined: Dec 04, 2001
       

Re: Which front office would you rather have running this team? 

Post#38 » by League Circles » Fri Feb 7, 2025 1:26 pm

DuckIII wrote:
nomorezorro wrote:also shout out to doug for being maybe the only person i can remember arguing that things could be worse during the twilight of the garpax administration


:wave:


I also pointed out the obvious truth that A new totally unknown front office could be worse than an average one had been.
https://august-shop.com/ - sneakers and streetwear
robert76
Junior
Posts: 415
And1: 252
Joined: Jan 01, 2012
Location: Romania
       

Re: Which front office would you rather have running this team? 

Post#39 » by robert76 » Fri Feb 7, 2025 1:50 pm

This is like the opposite of Sophie's Choice.
League Circles
RealGM
Posts: 35,693
And1: 10,125
Joined: Dec 04, 2001
       

Re: Which front office would you rather have running this team? 

Post#40 » by League Circles » Fri Feb 7, 2025 1:59 pm

Overall the Paxson was obviously similarly average to the AK one in results (though I'd take Paxson over AK personally), but the era cherry picked for this thread has such higher highs and such lower lows than the AK era it's hard to say. Both the Jimmy Butler and Rose trades were absurd IMO, and the talent evaluation was pretty bad for quite a few years.
https://august-shop.com/ - sneakers and streetwear

Return to Chicago Bulls