OkcSinceSGA wrote:JustBuzzin wrote:OkcSinceSGA wrote:
Well I think it's also production though. He was like a 26-27 ppg player 3 years ago. Wow... it was already 4 years since his best season so far. He's only 25. Is he gonna have a Serge Ibaka type arch where he randomly peaks at like 21-22? He was also the NBA's most electrifying player a couple years ago. IMO more so than Anthony Edwards.
Didn't he have a highlight dunk just weeks ago? He also said he's laying off the dunking for good reason he always gets hurt from his reckless style.
I just see a guy taking a backseat and it's leading to team success. His numbers are fine if they are winning. Now if he had these stats and they were losing you would have a point.
Well my problem with it... is it puts a ceiling on Memphis. Them morphing into the 2010 Atlanta Hawks type team= 2nd round exit at best. You cannot win really in the NBA without a clear, reliable 1A superstar. The Celtics last year kind of defied that, but that's because they have two guys that are borderline of that (Tatum overall is that guy, but in the playoffs hasn't been consistently yet)... and they had astronomical shooting, low turnovers and stupid depth. JJJ as great as he is, I still think is more ideally slotted as a high end #2 option. I don't see him being a reliable offensive engine for an entire deep playoff run when teams actively work on locking him up. So 2 years ago the reason for being high on Memphis if you were was a very deep, young, elite defense.. with a clear 1A superstar emerging in Ja that logically you'd expect to get to a top 10 player level. But his backslide individually for the better of the team (arguably) may actually lower their ceiling, even if it raised the floor.
I mean if you replace last year's Celtics with this year's Grizzlies, they are a lock for the finals (last year). Only decent team they would have to beat is the last year's Pacers and they are much better than that. So at that point the only thing that matters is how they matched up against the Mavs. So I would not say it's not possible for a team like the Grizzlies to win a title with a bracket like that.
in this scenario I am assuming they replace Boston since the scenario is "If Boston without a mega superstar could win a title can the Grizzlies" so I am replacing them with the Grizz to see if it would have been possible. Of course I don't think the Grizzlies would have beaten Boston in a series so nobody get that mixed up please.