Part one…a tweak.
TPE/Spur 27 unprotected for Beef Stew.
Sabonis/Val
Beef/Lyles
Murrary/DDR
Zach/Elis
Monk/Carter
If it’s DDR/Zach/Monk someone has to lead the second unit. DDR can have the ceremonial start but two minutes in…this rotation.
Piations get a first for a role player.
Part two…big changes
DDR/Val/27 Spurs/ 31 Minny unprotected for Zion.
Monk for McDaniel.
Kings go big with a lineup of Zach/Murray/McDaniels/Zion/Sabonis.
Pels get value equal to Fox. Minny gets a PG that’s not washed or a longways off rookie. Monk makes them better.
Sac Two Options
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Sac Two Options
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,020
- And1: 8,370
- Joined: Apr 15, 2020
Re: Sac Two Options
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 6,987
- And1: 8,450
- Joined: Feb 29, 2004
- Location: A retirement village near you
-
Re: Sac Two Options
DET has 3 rotation-worthy bigs:
- Harris (expiring next year, pretty meh)
- Duren (21, room for growth but probably a backup)
- Stewart (23, solid backup on fair contract)
We need to add to the front court because it is the weakest part of our line-up next season and beyond
We're not interested in trading one of our young bigs for space and a future FRP. Value is irrelevant when the direction is the exact opposite of what DET should be doing
- Harris (expiring next year, pretty meh)
- Duren (21, room for growth but probably a backup)
- Stewart (23, solid backup on fair contract)
We need to add to the front court because it is the weakest part of our line-up next season and beyond
We're not interested in trading one of our young bigs for space and a future FRP. Value is irrelevant when the direction is the exact opposite of what DET should be doing
In a no-win argument, the first poster to Let It Go will at least retain some peace of mind
Re: Sac Two Options
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,971
- And1: 2,365
- Joined: Jul 02, 2014
-
Re: Sac Two Options
After seeing DeRozan 3 years in CHI, he wouldn't accept coming off the bench. You can make the case that his skill set makes for a formidable bench group but his ego is just too big to not start.
Re: Sac Two Options
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,034
- And1: 703
- Joined: Dec 03, 2012
-
Re: Sac Two Options
ChettheJet wrote:After seeing DeRozan 3 years in CHI, he wouldn't accept coming off the bench. You can make the case that his skill set makes for a formidable bench group but his ego is just too big to not start.
This seems to be the case considering it was reported that Mike Brown approached DeRozan about coming off the bench and from reading various reports, listening to DeRozan answer some questions about this topic in interviews, and just reading between the lines in general, he doesn’t seem okay with that.
Re: Sac Two Options
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,891
- And1: 370
- Joined: Jun 20, 2007
-
Re: Sac Two Options
I'd pass on the Monk/McDaniels part for Minnesota. From a roster construction standpoint it creates more problems than it solves. While getting an upgrade at starting PG would be good, we'd have a real hole at the wing as there isn't really anyone who can take on that wing spot from McDaniels. And while its certainly not a perfect solution they currently have DDV, Dillingham, Conley and NAW (though he might not be back next year) that can cover PG duties along with some spot Ant minutes.
Re: Sac Two Options
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,259
- And1: 9,744
- Joined: Feb 04, 2005
- Location: San Francisco, CA
-
Re: Sac Two Options
Detroit shouldn’t trade Stewart at all, but definitely not for a first that’s very likely bottom 10 or worse. The Spurs are just starting to ramp up, I expect a solid playoff spot next year and even more the year after (this pick).
Return to Trades and Transactions