Bulls - Raptors (RJ to Chicago)
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Bulls - Raptors (RJ to Chicago)
- Thaddy
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,473
- And1: 3,731
- Joined: Dec 12, 2022
Bulls - Raptors (RJ to Chicago)
Raptors trade:
Barrett
Bulls trade:
Vucevic
2027, 2028, 2029 2nds
The Raptors need to make space for Agbaji's next contract. They will replace RJs offense with Ingram. The Raptors also need to get cheap rotation players from the 2nd round to subsidize their expensive starting line up.
The Bulls take a flyer on an improved Barrett. He's grown on the Raptors as a shooter, passer and there's a chance that trajectory continues. He's on a decent contract but he'll look for 35M+ AAV for his next deal and the Raptors can't afford it.
Barrett
Bulls trade:
Vucevic
2027, 2028, 2029 2nds
The Raptors need to make space for Agbaji's next contract. They will replace RJs offense with Ingram. The Raptors also need to get cheap rotation players from the 2nd round to subsidize their expensive starting line up.
The Bulls take a flyer on an improved Barrett. He's grown on the Raptors as a shooter, passer and there's a chance that trajectory continues. He's on a decent contract but he'll look for 35M+ AAV for his next deal and the Raptors can't afford it.
Re: Bulls - Raptors (RJ to Chicago)
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,832
- And1: 5,898
- Joined: Feb 12, 2016
-
Re: Bulls - Raptors (RJ to Chicago)
I think Chicago will finally move on from Vuc in the offseason for some meager 2nds. I think they are just at the beginning a rebuild, Barrett will put up some numbers but who cares with you are winning 15 games. I wouldn't waste any draft capital on him.
Re: Bulls - Raptors (RJ to Chicago)
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,679
- And1: 9,234
- Joined: Jul 23, 2011
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
-
Re: Bulls - Raptors (RJ to Chicago)
Why would the Bulls pay multiple 2nds to get off an expiring contract?
Re: Bulls - Raptors (RJ to Chicago)
- Thaddy
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,473
- And1: 3,731
- Joined: Dec 12, 2022
Re: Bulls - Raptors (RJ to Chicago)
Dez wrote:Why would the Bulls pay multiple 2nds to get off an expiring contract?
Barrett is better than Vucevic and he's not being sold for free.
Re: Bulls - Raptors (RJ to Chicago)
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 824
- And1: 563
- Joined: May 22, 2017
-
Re: Bulls - Raptors (RJ to Chicago)
I would do this from CHI perspective. Depending on what happens in the draft first, though.
Re: Bulls - Raptors (RJ to Chicago)
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,679
- And1: 9,234
- Joined: Jul 23, 2011
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
-
Re: Bulls - Raptors (RJ to Chicago)
Thaddy wrote:Dez wrote:Why would the Bulls pay multiple 2nds to get off an expiring contract?
Barrett is better than Vucevic and he's not being sold for free.
He's expiring........we'd just let him expire than attach picks to get rid of him.
There's no incentive to take on Barrett who isn't good.
Re: Bulls - Raptors (RJ to Chicago)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,250
- And1: 6,342
- Joined: Jul 11, 2001
- Location: Yelzenbah!
-
Re: Bulls - Raptors (RJ to Chicago)
letsgobulls23 wrote:I would do this from CHI perspective. Depending on what happens in the draft first, though.
Why?

Re: Bulls - Raptors (RJ to Chicago)
- Thaddy
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,473
- And1: 3,731
- Joined: Dec 12, 2022
Re: Bulls - Raptors (RJ to Chicago)
Indomitable wrote:letsgobulls23 wrote:I would do this from CHI perspective. Depending on what happens in the draft first, though.
Why?
Because the Bulls aren't good and need young talent.
Re: Bulls - Raptors (RJ to Chicago)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,250
- And1: 6,342
- Joined: Jul 11, 2001
- Location: Yelzenbah!
-
Re: Bulls - Raptors (RJ to Chicago)
Thaddy wrote:Indomitable wrote:letsgobulls23 wrote:I would do this from CHI perspective. Depending on what happens in the draft first, though.
Why?
Because the Bulls aren't good and need young talent.
He is not very good or they would have more wins

Re: Bulls - Raptors (RJ to Chicago)
- Thaddy
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,473
- And1: 3,731
- Joined: Dec 12, 2022
Re: Bulls - Raptors (RJ to Chicago)
Indomitable wrote:Thaddy wrote:Indomitable wrote:Why?
Because the Bulls aren't good and need young talent.
He is not very good or they would have more wins
By that logic everyone on the Bulls sucks and has no value. RJ doesn't suck he's one of the better scorers in the league and he has value in his potential.
Re: Bulls - Raptors (RJ to Chicago)
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 824
- And1: 563
- Joined: May 22, 2017
-
Re: Bulls - Raptors (RJ to Chicago)
Indomitable wrote:letsgobulls23 wrote:I would do this from CHI perspective. Depending on what happens in the draft first, though.
Why?
Because he's 24 and the hope is he continues to develop. Obviously overpaid but only 2 years left after this season. For Vuc expiring and 2nd's that isn't a lot to lose.
Re: Bulls - Raptors (RJ to Chicago)
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,971
- And1: 2,365
- Joined: Jul 02, 2014
-
Re: Bulls - Raptors (RJ to Chicago)
That works for the Bulls, if they have those SRP's. You should have come with this at the deadline.
Barrett to me is very much like Zach Lavine maybe a better passer and defender same length of contract, but mainly half the price leaving cap space to get other players. The Bulls then have 5-6 guards, many on expiring contracts to trade, but they'll do it.
Barrett to me is very much like Zach Lavine maybe a better passer and defender same length of contract, but mainly half the price leaving cap space to get other players. The Bulls then have 5-6 guards, many on expiring contracts to trade, but they'll do it.
Re: Bulls - Raptors (RJ to Chicago)
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 92,371
- And1: 98,216
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
-
Re: Bulls - Raptors (RJ to Chicago)
Thaddy wrote:Dez wrote:Why would the Bulls pay multiple 2nds to get off an expiring contract?
Barrett is better than Vucevic and he's not being sold for free.
But see at NBA basketball, Vuc is very clearly the better player. So you have that backwards. You have the worse player on the worse contract getting incentive.
Thats generally not how it works, though super cool if your team can pull it off.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: Bulls - Raptors (RJ to Chicago)
- Thaddy
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,473
- And1: 3,731
- Joined: Dec 12, 2022
Re: Bulls - Raptors (RJ to Chicago)
Texas Chuck wrote:Thaddy wrote:Dez wrote:Why would the Bulls pay multiple 2nds to get off an expiring contract?
Barrett is better than Vucevic and he's not being sold for free.
But see at NBA basketball, Vuc is very clearly the better player. So you have that backwards. You have the worse player on the worse contract getting incentive.
Thats generally not how it works, though super cool if your team can pull it off.
Barrett is a young talented piece while Vucevic has already aged out. Vucevic's only value comes from being an expiring contract.
Re: Bulls - Raptors (RJ to Chicago)
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 92,371
- And1: 98,216
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
-
Re: Bulls - Raptors (RJ to Chicago)
Thaddy wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:Thaddy wrote:Barrett is better than Vucevic and he's not being sold for free.
But see at NBA basketball, Vuc is very clearly the better player. So you have that backwards. You have the worse player on the worse contract getting incentive.
Thats generally not how it works, though super cool if your team can pull it off.
Barrett is a young talented piece while Vucevic has already aged out. Vucevic's only value comes from being an expiring contract.
Oh I see I see. Let's compare:
Vuc 54 games(starts) 32 mpg 19/10/4 2 stocks on 54/38/81 and a +1.5 on a team with a -4.5 only has value as an expiring, but...
RJ 42 games(starts) 33 mpg 21/7/6 on 47/35/65 1 stocks and a -9.2 on a team with a -5.9 is valuable?
Yeah unless its 1984 and we only look at box score totals and not any kind of effectiveness, Vuc is having a better season.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: Bulls - Raptors (RJ to Chicago)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,804
- And1: 10,476
- Joined: Dec 15, 2014
Re: Bulls - Raptors (RJ to Chicago)
Please stop asking the Bulls to send assets for RJ Barrett because he might become more than a volume chucker at some unspecified future time. If the Raptors are motivated to make space for Agbaji (not sure this is true btw) they can send incentive Chicago's way.
Re: Bulls - Raptors (RJ to Chicago)
- Thaddy
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,473
- And1: 3,731
- Joined: Dec 12, 2022
Re: Bulls - Raptors (RJ to Chicago)
Texas Chuck wrote:Thaddy wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:
But see at NBA basketball, Vuc is very clearly the better player. So you have that backwards. You have the worse player on the worse contract getting incentive.
Thats generally not how it works, though super cool if your team can pull it off.
Barrett is a young talented piece while Vucevic has already aged out. Vucevic's only value comes from being an expiring contract.
Oh I see I see. Let's compare:
Vuc 54 games(starts) 32 mpg 19/10/4 2 stocks on 54/38/81 and a +1.5 on a team with a -4.5 only has value as an expiring, but...
RJ 42 games(starts) 33 mpg 21/7/6 on 47/35/65 1 stocks and a -9.2 on a team with a -5.9 is valuable?
Yeah unless its 1984 and we only look at box score totals and not any kind of effectiveness, Vuc is having a better season.
Do you seriously believe Vucevic is having a breakout season at 34 years old?
RJ hasn't been playing the role he was brought in for because the Raptors are the most injured team in the league this year. They are also focused on "rebuilding" which is the corporate word for tanking.
https://craftednba.com/players/nikola-vucevic
He's one of the worst C defenders in the NBA.
https://www.espn.com/nba/player/splits/_/id/6478/nikola-vucevic
LOL he was on an unsustained heater in the last 20 games he back to his averages and shooting 26-30%.
Conclusively Vucevic's value comes from being an expiring 34 year old.
Re: Bulls - Raptors (RJ to Chicago)
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 92,371
- And1: 98,216
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
-
Re: Bulls - Raptors (RJ to Chicago)
Cool cool, Chicago should have zero interest in paying to help the Raps with their payroll issue. And certainly no interest in turning a good player into just an expiring player.
But luckily for Toronto all their players are amazing despite the record not being. But that is just them playing chess.
But luckily for Toronto all their players are amazing despite the record not being. But that is just them playing chess.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: Bulls - Raptors (RJ to Chicago)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,931
- And1: 13,862
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
-
Re: Bulls - Raptors (RJ to Chicago)
Texas Chuck wrote:Thaddy wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:
But see at NBA basketball, Vuc is very clearly the better player. So you have that backwards. You have the worse player on the worse contract getting incentive.
Thats generally not how it works, though super cool if your team can pull it off.
Barrett is a young talented piece while Vucevic has already aged out. Vucevic's only value comes from being an expiring contract.
Oh I see I see. Let's compare:
Vuc 54 games(starts) 32 mpg 19/10/4 2 stocks on 54/38/81 and a +1.5 on a team with a -4.5 only has value as an expiring, but...
RJ 42 games(starts) 33 mpg 21/7/6 on 47/35/65 1 stocks and a -9.2 on a team with a -5.9 is valuable?
Yeah unless its 1984 and we only look at box score totals and not any kind of effectiveness, Vuc is having a better season.
where did you get those on-off numbers? on BRef Barrett's on-off is +5.1 (On-court is -3.6). Vucevic's on-off is -1.2 (on-court is -4.7). Or were those numbers supposed to mean something else.
I agree Vuc has been playing better this year and Chicago wouldn't/shouldn't entertain OP though
Re: Bulls - Raptors (RJ to Chicago)
- Thaddy
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,473
- And1: 3,731
- Joined: Dec 12, 2022
Re: Bulls - Raptors (RJ to Chicago)
Godaddycurse wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:Thaddy wrote:Barrett is a young talented piece while Vucevic has already aged out. Vucevic's only value comes from being an expiring contract.
Oh I see I see. Let's compare:
Vuc 54 games(starts) 32 mpg 19/10/4 2 stocks on 54/38/81 and a +1.5 on a team with a -4.5 only has value as an expiring, but...
RJ 42 games(starts) 33 mpg 21/7/6 on 47/35/65 1 stocks and a -9.2 on a team with a -5.9 is valuable?
Yeah unless its 1984 and we only look at box score totals and not any kind of effectiveness, Vuc is having a better season.
where did you get those on-off numbers? on BRef Barrett's on-off is +5.1 (On-court is -3.6). Vucevic's on-off is -1.2 (on-court is -4.7). Or were those numbers supposed to mean something else.
I agree Vuc has been playing better this year and Chicago wouldn't/shouldn't entertain OP though
https://www.espn.com/nba/player/splits/_/id/6478/nikola-vucevic
You don't suddenly get better at 34!
Return to Trades and Transactions