Chris Mullin still has it

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,742
And1: 14,097
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: Chris Mullin still has it 

Post#41 » by JRoy » Fri Feb 14, 2025 7:04 pm

dhsilv2 wrote:
JRoy wrote:
dhsilv2 wrote:Man it's sad to see how much these guys let themselves go.


Father Time is undefeated.


Father time ages you. It doesn't make you be 6'5 and 350 pounds like Richmond.


He looks about 270 to me but baggy clothes do hide the extra pounds.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
User avatar
CM17
Junior
Posts: 262
And1: 206
Joined: Jul 12, 2016
Location: Germany
 

Re: Chris Mullin still has it 

Post#42 » by CM17 » Fri Feb 14, 2025 7:39 pm

He has a unique shooting style. Always love to see it.
User avatar
JimmyPlopper
Head Coach
Posts: 7,458
And1: 10,151
Joined: Sep 25, 2020
Location: Donald B's is the place to give me the pace

Re: Chris Mullin still has it 

Post#43 » by JimmyPlopper » Fri Feb 14, 2025 7:40 pm

Mitch been eating well!!!
a slave stood behind the conqueror holding a golden crown, and whispering in his ear a warning: that all glory is fleeting
dhsilv2
RealGM
Posts: 50,520
And1: 27,262
Joined: Oct 04, 2015

Re: Chris Mullin still has it 

Post#44 » by dhsilv2 » Fri Feb 14, 2025 7:46 pm

JRoy wrote:
dhsilv2 wrote:
JRoy wrote:
Father Time is undefeated.


Father time ages you. It doesn't make you be 6'5 and 350 pounds like Richmond.


He looks about 270 to me but baggy clothes do hide the extra pounds.


No way in heck at his height he's 270. He'd have absolutely no muscle mass if that were the case.
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,742
And1: 14,097
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: Chris Mullin still has it 

Post#45 » by JRoy » Fri Feb 14, 2025 7:53 pm

dhsilv2 wrote:
JRoy wrote:
dhsilv2 wrote:
Father time ages you. It doesn't make you be 6'5 and 350 pounds like Richmond.


He looks about 270 to me but baggy clothes do hide the extra pounds.


No way in heck at his height he's 270. He'd have absolutely no muscle mass if that were the case.


He looks something like Barkley in his playing days (minus the old man walk).
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
dhsilv2
RealGM
Posts: 50,520
And1: 27,262
Joined: Oct 04, 2015

Re: Chris Mullin still has it 

Post#46 » by dhsilv2 » Fri Feb 14, 2025 7:59 pm

JRoy wrote:
dhsilv2 wrote:
JRoy wrote:
He looks about 270 to me but baggy clothes do hide the extra pounds.


No way in heck at his height he's 270. He'd have absolutely no muscle mass if that were the case.


He looks something like Barkley in his playing days (minus the old man walk).


nah

Image
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,742
And1: 14,097
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: Chris Mullin still has it 

Post#47 » by JRoy » Fri Feb 14, 2025 8:01 pm

dhsilv2 wrote:
JRoy wrote:
dhsilv2 wrote:
No way in heck at his height he's 270. He'd have absolutely no muscle mass if that were the case.


He looks something like Barkley in his playing days (minus the old man walk).


nah

Image


That is probably Chuck at his fittest.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
dhsilv2
RealGM
Posts: 50,520
And1: 27,262
Joined: Oct 04, 2015

Re: Chris Mullin still has it 

Post#48 » by dhsilv2 » Fri Feb 14, 2025 8:02 pm

JRoy wrote:
dhsilv2 wrote:
JRoy wrote:
He looks something like Barkley in his playing days (minus the old man walk).


nah

Image


That is probably Chuck at his fittest.


Not at all, his fittest was when he was at his peak on the 76ers

Image
ghillphx
Senior
Posts: 617
And1: 499
Joined: Jul 05, 2021

Re: Chris Mullin still has it 

Post#49 » by ghillphx » Sat Feb 15, 2025 12:44 am

dhsilv2 wrote:Man it's sad to see how much these guys let themselves go.


How old are you?
Ol Roy
Senior
Posts: 547
And1: 616
Joined: Dec 03, 2023

Re: Chris Mullin still has it 

Post#50 » by Ol Roy » Sat Feb 15, 2025 1:58 am

tsherkin wrote:
dhsilv2 wrote:Man it's sad to see how much these guys let themselves go.


It's worth remembering what happens when your body has grown accustomed to the way professional athletes have to live. Their caloric intake is one thing, but their metabolism changes over time. Life catches up with all of us eventually, man; judgement isn't necessarily a good look. It's quite possible that they're still working out, but it becomes progressively harder to hang onto muscle mass, and they aren't doing the cardio they used to as active players, which adds up over time even if they've ratched down their caloric intake.

Food for thought.


Too many Americans in general are overweight. It's a regionalized thing, and a modern thing, and it's almost totally dietary. Being fat in almost every case is a result of decisions people make when they sit down to eat a meal. The idea of "aging gracefully" is that you have to adjust behavior to account for bodily changes.

The short of it is, you don't have to be overweight just because you are an ex-athlete or 60. Is letting yourself go a character flaw? That can be debated, but I don't think anyone is arguing that some of these guys are monsters because they're chubby.
WarriorGM
General Manager
Posts: 8,900
And1: 4,216
Joined: Aug 19, 2017

Re: Chris Mullin still has it 

Post#51 » by WarriorGM » Sat Feb 15, 2025 2:48 am

We see these comments that men are overweight with their dad bods but just how true is it? There are actors who trained for roles that required them to get ripped. A couple years later when people inquire why they aren't anymore they say it is because it is unsustainable and unhealthy. Not just that it required work but maintaining the physique was actively causing health problems.

The body will do what it wants to do and for the most part it knows what it is doing.
User avatar
G R E Y
Senior Mod - Spurs
Senior Mod - Spurs
Posts: 51,689
And1: 39,529
Joined: Mar 17, 2010
Location: Silver and Black
 

Re: Chris Mullin still has it 

Post#52 » by G R E Y » Sat Feb 15, 2025 3:08 am

Spurs need to sign Mullin. Stat.
ImageImageImage
The Spurs Way Ever Onward

#XX
Ol Roy
Senior
Posts: 547
And1: 616
Joined: Dec 03, 2023

Re: Chris Mullin still has it 

Post#53 » by Ol Roy » Sat Feb 15, 2025 3:41 am

WarriorGM wrote:We see these comments that men are overweight with their dad bods but just how true is it? There are actors who trained for roles that required them to get ripped. A couple years later when people inquire why they aren't anymore they say it is because it is unsustainable and unhealthy. Not just that it required work but maintaining the physique was actively causing health problems.

The body will do what it wants to do and for the most part it knows what it is doing.


Actors have a very limited timetable to prepare for roles before shooting, often a matter of weeks, so of course their regimen (which often includes PEDs) is unsustainable. That doesn't mean having dietary and exercise discipline is itself unsustainable. The benefit to always being in good shape as an actor is that bulking up or shredding for a role isn't such an extreme process. Harrison Ford and Clint Eastwood come to mind as actors who've always taken care of themselves.

The human body wasn't designed for our lax lifestyles and unhealthy food, so letting it "do what it wants to do" is not a responsible way to treat yourself.
threethehardway
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,366
And1: 2,119
Joined: May 31, 2021

Re: Chris Mullin still has it 

Post#54 » by threethehardway » Sat Feb 15, 2025 4:27 am

dhsilv2 wrote:We don't judge people enough or harsh enough. Richmond is just down right unhealthy fat here. And the rest of this is mostly just mumbo jumbo.


Why do you care?

Lol, nobody here knows these people and nobody cares about them.

It's so stupid seeing random anonymous people on the internet, judging the looks of famous people by comparing them to what they look like 40 years ago.

These are retired old men and here you are, "Wow, they let themselves go..."

What do retired old men normally look like?

:lol:

A lot of this is pure jealous and resentment disguised as concern.

The argument in the back of the minds of these judgey ass people is...

"Well, if I was rich and was professional athlete or entertainer, I would look like..."

And my argument is, if you don't put the work in now and take the PEDs and put in the discipline to look and feel your best, you wouldn't do it if they put 100 million dollars in your lap.
Bird4Three
Rookie
Posts: 1,021
And1: 1,701
Joined: Dec 23, 2008
 

Re: Chris Mullin still has it 

Post#55 » by Bird4Three » Sat Feb 15, 2025 5:12 am

61 y/o Mullin showing em how it’s done. One of the best shooters ever.
picko
Veteran
Posts: 2,583
And1: 3,696
Joined: May 17, 2018

Re: Chris Mullin still has it 

Post#56 » by picko » Sat Feb 15, 2025 6:09 am

I think some of you also fail to understand the impact that playing 800 to 1000 games of professional basketball has on a player's body. It's probably easier for a random 50 year old to be in good shape than it is for a former athlete. The knees and ankles and backs of these guys are likely to be in pretty rough shape, limiting their ability to maintain a base level of fitness as they age.

Quite simply, the human body really isn't designed to play basketball for that many years with such regularity.
Ruma85
Analyst
Posts: 3,484
And1: 1,935
Joined: Sep 09, 2021
   

Re: Chris Mullin still has it 

Post#57 » by Ruma85 » Sat Feb 15, 2025 11:42 am

og15 wrote:
-Luke- wrote:OK, now I want to see the slam dunk contest between the four.

No one wants to see that

tsherkin wrote:
dhsilv2 wrote:Man it's sad to see how much these guys let themselves go.


It's worth remembering what happens when your body has grown accustomed to the way professional athletes have to live. Their caloric intake is one thing, but their metabolism changes over time. Life catches up with all of us eventually, man; judgement isn't necessarily a good look. It's quite possible that they're still working out, but it becomes progressively harder to hang onto muscle mass, and they aren't doing the cardio they used to as active players, which adds up over time even if they've ratched down their caloric intake.

Food for thought.

Realistically, most of those guys are just enjoying life a lot and getting their fill of food and drink. It actually wouldn't be that hard for them to be in better shape, but you'd have to actually want to be.

I have former pro athlete friends, basketball, football, soccer, volleyball and hockey, and it's really not that difficult to stay in shape, but that is if you see it as a priority. If not, of course you will gain weight. You need something like approx. 200 calories less per day in your diet every decade after your 20's. You either have to keep exercising more to make it up, or you have to cut down on some calories somewhere.

Thing is that you would have to actually care enough about it.



As a nutritionist, I approve this message :nod:
Life is beautiful...
Ruma85
Analyst
Posts: 3,484
And1: 1,935
Joined: Sep 09, 2021
   

Re: Chris Mullin still has it 

Post#58 » by Ruma85 » Sat Feb 15, 2025 11:52 am

picko wrote:I think some of you also fail to understand the impact that playing 800 to 1000 games of professional basketball has on a player's body. It's probably easier for a random 50 year old to be in good shape than it is for a former athlete. The knees and ankles and backs of these guys are likely to be in pretty rough shape, limiting their ability to maintain a base level of fitness as they age.

Quite simply, the human body really isn't designed to play basketball for that many years with such regularity.


Probably should not be use there, it can be likely, but probably no, I agree on the longevity of players that play for 10,15, & 20+ years, and having injures,tears,bumps & bruises, though nothing is holding them down to look overweight, unless (of course) they have major health issues therefore to be a lot healthy you need to have a will or a need to be. Side note: if you have been in shape most your life, The body will have a easier time getting back into shape, then a person trying to get in shape for the first time, or even countless times.
Life is beautiful...
User avatar
165bows
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,162
And1: 15,025
Joined: Jan 03, 2013
Location: The land of incremental improvement.

Re: Chris Mullin still has it 

Post#59 » by 165bows » Sat Feb 15, 2025 1:28 pm

tsherkin wrote:
dhsilv2 wrote:We don't judge people enough or harsh enough. Richmond is just down right unhealthy fat here. And the rest of this is mostly just mumbo jumbo.


No, it isn't. It's biology. Yeah, it's possible that they could be doing a little better, but your appreciation for how aging and sport affect the body could use some work.

If your body is accustomed to a 4500 calorie-a-day diet, it isn't easy to change that. But as you move into a life that isn't cardio all day most days of the weak, that adds weight. And even if you're working out a reasonable amount (but less than you were as a professional athlete), muscle converts to fat as we age.

So even if they're making reasonable efforts, it's quite possible that this could happen anyway. Beyond that, you don't know things like, are they diabetic? Do they have kidney problems? Thyroid issues? Things which aren't entirely uncommon as a result of their situation and age. But even in the absence of that, you're being a bit ignorant and judgmental, tbh, particularly in the absence of any information about their lifestyles or habits.

Hmm that would be a sizable number of metabolic pathways for that to happen.
MavsDirk41
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,764
And1: 4,470
Joined: Dec 07, 2022
     

Re: Chris Mullin still has it 

Post#60 » by MavsDirk41 » Sat Feb 15, 2025 2:15 pm

dhsilv2 wrote:
JRoy wrote:
dhsilv2 wrote:
Father time ages you. It doesn't make you be 6'5 and 350 pounds like Richmond.


He looks about 270 to me but baggy clothes do hide the extra pounds.


No way in heck at his height he's 270. He'd have absolutely no muscle mass if that were the case.


He aint 350

Return to The General Board