ciueli wrote:He is a swing, he will be a player who has to guard other swings. The fact is we don't have a good defensive starter at the 1, 2, or 3 spot, that is a massive liability on defence, no question.
This assumes Scottie at the 4 the entire time, so it isn't entirely correct. And again, Ingram isn't a bad defender, he just isn't threatening the All-D teams.
So what you're saying is that I'm not incorrect at all? Because you have to go all the way back to 2020-21 to see a season where he played at least 60 games and attempted 6+ 3s per game on a decent percentage?
We're assuming he plays 60+ games. The reduced volume from two seasons doesn't outweigh the two seasons prior to that, nor how he was playing when he was on the court this year.
Say what you want about DeMar DeRozan and his midrange game, but at least he made up for it a bit by getting to the line consistently (lot of seasons with 8+ FTA per game).
I mean, no, not really. DeRozan "made up for it" by posting comparable efficiency to Ingram. He didn't become efficient until he left us, so it was really "six of one, half a dozen of the other" between the two. Only he didn't have the 3pt range at all. And it took several years before DeRozan caught himself up to league average efficiency as his volume increased. So he isn't a particularly good example to draw. He was surely excellent at getting to the rim, but because he was below average at actually making shots and had no 3pt range, it ultimately didn't much matter.
And yet we paid him a player friendly contract that gives him $40M/year and full control of his career going forward if he does break out. And we didn't even get to see him play a single game with our core to see if the fit is good and they can win games. Ridiculous.
I'm not sure why you're arguing here; I was agreeing that his health is a concern for us.
You should tell that to Darko since he plays Scottie as a guard while slotting in Barrett as a PF.
Barrett doesn't guard anyone of consequential size, we know this. Scottie handling doesn't make him a guard.
Realistically we use Agbaji as an SF, all of Barrett, Agbaji, Ja'Kobe, and Gradey play SF for part of their minutes because they are on the floor at the same time, we aren't exclusively playing all four of those playes at SG 100% of the time.
Sure. Most players don't play exclusively at one specific position. My point was that there is room for this not to be an issue at all.
It's not a reasonable series when he averaged 14.3PPG and was supposed to be the main scorer on his team you know, what Brandon Ingram is supposed to be good at, the entire reason for his value as a player. When he can't even do that in a playoff series, why are we spending $40M/year on him?
And again, over a 4-game sample where two of them were good, and within the context of 10 total games played in the playoffs, you're overreacting. Badly. It's possible that he proves to be a crap playoff performer, but it's equally possible that 2 games don't define his postseason ability.