REJECTEDBYCLARK wrote:Yallbecrazy wrote:REJECTEDBYCLARK wrote:
I think anyone who is closely following Duke knows Khaman is being forced to operate within a certain framework as Scheyer is trying to win a national title and will not tolerate any kind of adventurism from him. On another team with more liberty I don't see why the assist rate wouldn't be similar to many current starting centers when they were that age such as Sabonis, Gobert, Capela, Valanciunas, etc..
I think your point highly excludes him from becoming a higher USG offensive hub which I agree with, not from being a functional NBA starting center.
Assists are important not just from an offensive standpoint, but they demonstrate high bbiq, which is critical from a defensive standpoint.
Oh I don't disagree entirely. But Rudy Gobert is 7x all-defense and had garbo assist totals overseas. Khaman is an 18 year old. AST% generally increases over time. Then you have NBA bigs who can pass the ball quite well and are either subpar or neutral defenders.
If you're trying to find the next Jokic then AST:TO will matter. I don't think Condon is that guy w/ 7ft WS and pretty mid scoring ability.
Gorbert has a 7'9 wingspan, which is in the Wemby (8') and Edey (7'10) range.
Maluach only has a 7'6 wingspan.
I don't think we are looking for a point centre, but not someone who has little in passing.
As for improving, basketball IQ is one the of harder thing to improve. He can provide handoffs for assist, but spotting open players are not most players can improve on. Not just C, there are many players who never improve on their passing (eg. Powell).
I think Maluach is more projected to Capela. Not saying the others are better, maybe projected as Allan or any Center paying in the 20m range. This is one reason I am unsure we want to draft a C in the top 10.