Image ImageImage Image

Which front office would you rather have running this team?

Moderators: HomoSapien, Ice Man, Michael Jackson, dougthonus, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10

Who would you pick to run this team?

GarPax (2011-2020)
60
88%
AKME (2020-Present)
8
12%
 
Total votes: 68

Ballerkingn23
Junior
Posts: 279
And1: 111
Joined: Apr 24, 2022
Contact:
   

Re: Which front office would you rather have running this team? 

Post#81 » by Ballerkingn23 » Mon Feb 17, 2025 4:39 pm

Gar/pax would at least get draft picks back for quality talent.

Its like AK hates draft picks and rather just dump a player for a player and cap space. Otherwise they not too different imo.

Both don't know when to let go of players and both don't know how to build a competitive roster.
User avatar
CROBulls
Rookie
Posts: 1,076
And1: 719
Joined: Jan 11, 2022
 

Re: Which front office would you rather have running this team? 

Post#82 » by CROBulls » Mon Feb 17, 2025 6:37 pm

Ballerkingn23 wrote:Gar/pax would at least get draft picks back for quality talent.

Its like AK hates draft picks and rather just dump a player for a player and cap space. Otherwise they not too different imo.

Both don't know when to let go of players and both don't know how to build a competitive roster.

AK hates picks because that means scouting all year and traveling to college games. And it's messing with his workout. His words.
Am2626
Analyst
Posts: 3,232
And1: 1,093
Joined: Jul 13, 2013

Re: Which front office would you rather have running this team? 

Post#83 » by Am2626 » Mon Feb 17, 2025 7:34 pm

evilboy wrote:Who cares, both sucked.


There should be a third option for “Neither”
User avatar
SHO'NUFF
Head Coach
Posts: 7,082
And1: 2,208
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Location: ★ ★ ★ ★
Contact:
 

Re: Which front office would you rather have running this team? 

Post#84 » by SHO'NUFF » Mon Feb 17, 2025 9:06 pm

Can't do it. Can't vote. Jumping off a bridge should have been an option.
#BullsFansLivesMatter Image
User avatar
prolific passer
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,183
And1: 1,470
Joined: Mar 11, 2009
     

Re: Which front office would you rather have running this team? 

Post#85 » by prolific passer » Mon Feb 17, 2025 11:46 pm

Jcool0 wrote:
prolific passer wrote:
Axl Rose wrote:I'll take Paxson from 2003-2009 back. Otherwise I'll stick with the current front office, begrudgingly. As bad as AKME are It doesn't seem they are anywhere close to the level of toxic that was the GarPax regime from 2011-2019.

Also post Jimmy they forgot how to draft and were lost on how to build a team in the new pace and space era. The success we had in that era was largely the work of Paxson 2003-2009.

I think most would take Paxson alone due to his draft strategy of drafting/signing rookies out of winning situations to help change the culture of the bulls. Only really bad move he did was trading out Aldridge for Tyrus in terms of that strategy.


I think it also depends if you think passing on future MVPs for "winning" players is something that your okay with because the "winning" players didn't bust.

Well he did draft a MVP.
User avatar
Michael Jackson
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 29,808
And1: 11,825
Joined: Jun 15, 2001

Re: Which front office would you rather have running this team? 

Post#86 » by Michael Jackson » Tue Feb 18, 2025 1:41 pm

DuckIII wrote:
nomorezorro wrote:also shout out to doug for being maybe the only person i can remember arguing that things could be worse during the twilight of the garpax administration


:wave:



Yeah I always knew it could get worse. I was a big pax supporter but angry in the end because of being too complacent and letting Gar make some dumb moves but the guy wanted out so bad. Funny that the big worry was that Paxson would still be pulling the strings. The same sentiment can be about ownership too, a replacement in this market isn’t likely to be much better and could be worse. It will more than likely be VC or whitewashing oil money both which will have just as little connectivity to fans. Best case scenario is someone like Ishba but that has its own problems.
User avatar
Jcool0
RealGM
Posts: 15,473
And1: 9,383
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
Location: Illinois
         

Re: Which front office would you rather have running this team? 

Post#87 » by Jcool0 » Tue Feb 18, 2025 3:23 pm

prolific passer wrote:
Jcool0 wrote:
prolific passer wrote:I think most would take Paxson alone due to his draft strategy of drafting/signing rookies out of winning situations to help change the culture of the bulls. Only really bad move he did was trading out Aldridge for Tyrus in terms of that strategy.


I think it also depends if you think passing on future MVPs for "winning" players is something that your okay with because the "winning" players didn't bust.

Well he did draft a MVP.


#1 overall in a draft Bulls had 1.7 percent chance to get it. So you cant even say he was trying to tank for Rose. I am more referring to taking WCJ over Collin Sexton, Mikal Bridges, SGA, Miles Bridges & MPJ. He went safe and passed on more talented players.
User avatar
prolific passer
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,183
And1: 1,470
Joined: Mar 11, 2009
     

Re: Which front office would you rather have running this team? 

Post#88 » by prolific passer » Tue Feb 18, 2025 4:16 pm

Jcool0 wrote:
prolific passer wrote:
Jcool0 wrote:
I think it also depends if you think passing on future MVPs for "winning" players is something that your okay with because the "winning" players didn't bust.

Well he did draft a MVP.


#1 overall in a draft Bulls had 1.7 percent chance to get it. So you cant even say he was trying to tank for Rose. I am more referring to taking WCJ over Collin Sexton, Mikal Bridges, SGA, Miles Bridges & MPJ. He went safe and passed on more talented players.


That's the garpax era who really has no plan when it came to drafting. I was talking about the Paxson era itself when he drafted Kirk, Gordon, Deng, Duhon, Noc, Noah, Aldridge(even though he didn't play for them), and Rose. All those guys had deep runs in NCAA tournament runs and a few won a title or 2 and one won a gold medal.
jnrjr79
Head Coach
Posts: 6,863
And1: 4,091
Joined: May 27, 2003
Location: Chicago

Re: Which front office would you rather have running this team? 

Post#89 » by jnrjr79 » Tue Feb 18, 2025 4:46 pm

prolific passer wrote:
Jcool0 wrote:
prolific passer wrote:Well he did draft a MVP.


#1 overall in a draft Bulls had 1.7 percent chance to get it. So you cant even say he was trying to tank for Rose. I am more referring to taking WCJ over Collin Sexton, Mikal Bridges, SGA, Miles Bridges & MPJ. He went safe and passed on more talented players.


That's the garpax era who really has no plan when it came to drafting. I was talking about the Paxson era itself when he drafted Kirk, Gordon, Deng, Duhon, Noc, Noah, Aldridge(even though he didn't play for them), and Rose. All those guys had deep runs in NCAA tournament runs and a few won a title or 2 and one won a gold medal.


I wouldn't credit Aldridge as a Paxson pick for the reason you note - he didn't play for the Bulls and was not drafted for them. The Bulls wanted Thomas.
User avatar
prolific passer
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,183
And1: 1,470
Joined: Mar 11, 2009
     

Re: Which front office would you rather have running this team? 

Post#90 » by prolific passer » Tue Feb 18, 2025 4:49 pm

jnrjr79 wrote:
prolific passer wrote:
Jcool0 wrote:
#1 overall in a draft Bulls had 1.7 percent chance to get it. So you cant even say he was trying to tank for Rose. I am more referring to taking WCJ over Collin Sexton, Mikal Bridges, SGA, Miles Bridges & MPJ. He went safe and passed on more talented players.


That's the garpax era who really has no plan when it came to drafting. I was talking about the Paxson era itself when he drafted Kirk, Gordon, Deng, Duhon, Noc, Noah, Aldridge(even though he didn't play for them), and Rose. All those guys had deep runs in NCAA tournament runs and a few won a title or 2 and one won a gold medal.


I wouldn't credit Aldridge as a Paxson pick for the reason you note - he didn't play for the Bulls and was not drafted for them. The Bulls wanted Thomas.

Yeah. I know. Bulls made a blunder with that trade.
User avatar
Jcool0
RealGM
Posts: 15,473
And1: 9,383
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
Location: Illinois
         

Re: Which front office would you rather have running this team? 

Post#91 » by Jcool0 » Tue Feb 18, 2025 6:14 pm

prolific passer wrote:
Jcool0 wrote:
prolific passer wrote:Well he did draft a MVP.


#1 overall in a draft Bulls had 1.7 percent chance to get it. So you cant even say he was trying to tank for Rose. I am more referring to taking WCJ over Collin Sexton, Mikal Bridges, SGA, Miles Bridges & MPJ. He went safe and passed on more talented players.


That's the garpax era who really has no plan when it came to drafting. I was talking about the Paxson era itself when he drafted Kirk, Gordon, Deng, Duhon, Noc, Noah, Aldridge(even though he didn't play for them), and Rose. All those guys had deep runs in NCAA tournament runs and a few won a title or 2 and one won a gold medal.


You can look at those years to. They took Ben Gordon at #3 and Deng at #7. You can make a case those teams are better with Devin Harris and Andre Iguodala. Probably should of taken Shaun Livingston at 3 since he had unlimited upside being almost 6'8" with guard skills only derailed by injury he might not have gotten on the Bulls.
User avatar
prolific passer
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,183
And1: 1,470
Joined: Mar 11, 2009
     

Re: Which front office would you rather have running this team? 

Post#92 » by prolific passer » Tue Feb 18, 2025 6:24 pm

Jcool0 wrote:
prolific passer wrote:
Jcool0 wrote:
#1 overall in a draft Bulls had 1.7 percent chance to get it. So you cant even say he was trying to tank for Rose. I am more referring to taking WCJ over Collin Sexton, Mikal Bridges, SGA, Miles Bridges & MPJ. He went safe and passed on more talented players.


That's the garpax era who really has no plan when it came to drafting. I was talking about the Paxson era itself when he drafted Kirk, Gordon, Deng, Duhon, Noc, Noah, Aldridge(even though he didn't play for them), and Rose. All those guys had deep runs in NCAA tournament runs and a few won a title or 2 and one won a gold medal.


You can look at those years to. They took Ben Gordon at #3 and Deng at #7. You can make a case those teams are better with Devin Harris and Andre Iguodala. Probably should of taken Shaun Livingston at 3 since he had unlimited upside being almost 6'8" with guard skills only derailed by injury he might not have gotten on the Bulls.

Hard to argue against Gordon and Deng. Bulls were trying to build like the Pistons. Kirk was Billups, Gordon was Rip, Deng was Prince, and Noc and Duhon were the Williamson and Hunter off the bench for them. They couldn't find their Sheed and Ben Wallace combo at the PF and C spots and their Larry brown type of coach to put it all together.
User avatar
Jcool0
RealGM
Posts: 15,473
And1: 9,383
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
Location: Illinois
         

Re: Which front office would you rather have running this team? 

Post#93 » by Jcool0 » Tue Feb 18, 2025 6:53 pm

prolific passer wrote:
Jcool0 wrote:
prolific passer wrote:
That's the garpax era who really has no plan when it came to drafting. I was talking about the Paxson era itself when he drafted Kirk, Gordon, Deng, Duhon, Noc, Noah, Aldridge(even though he didn't play for them), and Rose. All those guys had deep runs in NCAA tournament runs and a few won a title or 2 and one won a gold medal.


You can look at those years to. They took Ben Gordon at #3 and Deng at #7. You can make a case those teams are better with Devin Harris and Andre Iguodala. Probably should of taken Shaun Livingston at 3 since he had unlimited upside being almost 6'8" with guard skills only derailed by injury he might not have gotten on the Bulls.

Hard to argue against Gordon and Deng. Bulls were trying to build like the Pistons. Kirk was Billups, Gordon was Rip, Deng was Prince, and Noc and Duhon were the Williamson and Hunter off the bench for them. They couldn't find their Sheed and Ben Wallace combo at the PF and C spots and their Larry brown type of coach to put it all together.


Harris and Igudola were both the better versions of what the Bulls got. Also hard for Gordon to be Rip when he was a 6th man and 4" shorter.
User avatar
prolific passer
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,183
And1: 1,470
Joined: Mar 11, 2009
     

Re: Which front office would you rather have running this team? 

Post#94 » by prolific passer » Tue Feb 18, 2025 7:07 pm

Jcool0 wrote:
prolific passer wrote:
Jcool0 wrote:
You can look at those years to. They took Ben Gordon at #3 and Deng at #7. You can make a case those teams are better with Devin Harris and Andre Iguodala. Probably should of taken Shaun Livingston at 3 since he had unlimited upside being almost 6'8" with guard skills only derailed by injury he might not have gotten on the Bulls.

Hard to argue against Gordon and Deng. Bulls were trying to build like the Pistons. Kirk was Billups, Gordon was Rip, Deng was Prince, and Noc and Duhon were the Williamson and Hunter off the bench for them. They couldn't find their Sheed and Ben Wallace combo at the PF and C spots and their Larry brown type of coach to put it all together.


Harris and Igudola were both the better versions of what the Bulls got. Also hard for Gordon to be Rip when he was a 6th man and 4" shorter.


Sure Gordon was shorter than both Ray and Rip but they all went to UConn and had similar styles and Gordon was one of the most clutch players in the NBA during his time with bulls.
Ballerkingn23
Junior
Posts: 279
And1: 111
Joined: Apr 24, 2022
Contact:
   

Re: Which front office would you rather have running this team? 

Post#95 » by Ballerkingn23 » Tue Feb 18, 2025 8:17 pm

CROBulls wrote:
Ballerkingn23 wrote:Gar/pax would at least get draft picks back for quality talent.

Its like AK hates draft picks and rather just dump a player for a player and cap space. Otherwise they not too different imo.

Both don't know when to let go of players and both don't know how to build a competitive roster.

AK hates picks because that means scouting all year and traveling to college games. And it's messing with his workout. His words.



:noway: :noway: :noway:

Return to Chicago Bulls