Booker
for
Banchero (Filler contracts can be changed, core of deal is Banchero + picks for Booker)
Anthony
WCJ
Jett
2026 Swap extinguished
2025 #1
Durant
for
Wiggins
Anderson
Ware (Filler contracts can be changed, core of deal is Durant + Juaquez for Durant)
Juaquez
- For Orlando, they get an immediate upgrade in talent, and cut their window a little shorter.
- For Miami, form a new big three with Herro / Bam / Durant at the cost of some of their youth.
- For Phoenix, if they choose not to start from scratch, they retool, and add back some picks
Anthony / Micic
Beal / Allen / Jett
Juaquez / ONeal / Dunn
Banchero / Anderson
Ware / Richards
Phoenix Retool without Tanking (ORL and MIA)
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Phoenix Retool without Tanking (ORL and MIA)
- LarsV8
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,142
- And1: 5,448
- Joined: Dec 13, 2009
-
Re: Phoenix Retool without Tanking (ORL and MIA)
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,832
- And1: 5,898
- Joined: Feb 12, 2016
-
Re: Phoenix Retool without Tanking (ORL and MIA)
I have Ware>Juaquez. So he is no filler, then Ware should be replaced if you didn't intend for your offer to include that level of value.
Re: Phoenix Retool without Tanking (ORL and MIA)
- babyjax13
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,012
- And1: 17,527
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Occupied Los Angeles
-
Re: Phoenix Retool without Tanking (ORL and MIA)
I think Banchero is comfortably more valuable than Booker. Our forum poll seems to indicate that is the consensus.
Ware is probably more valuable than Jacquez. I think Phoenix could probably extract Jacquez and a first, but not Ware? The Orlando one probably doesn't have legs. I'd be looking more for a situation with another star that may want out of their current situation - but I'm not sure sending Booker out is going to be more than a lateral move in most cases?
Ware is probably more valuable than Jacquez. I think Phoenix could probably extract Jacquez and a first, but not Ware? The Orlando one probably doesn't have legs. I'd be looking more for a situation with another star that may want out of their current situation - but I'm not sure sending Booker out is going to be more than a lateral move in most cases?

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.
JColl
Re: Phoenix Retool without Tanking (ORL and MIA)
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,747
- And1: 2,269
- Joined: Jan 25, 2025
-
Re: Phoenix Retool without Tanking (ORL and MIA)
It's always interesting when you see people completely mis-evaluate prospects on opposing teams. They aren't being malicious but it always makes you go "umm".
For exactly one month, Ware has been a 12/10/1.2 guys with 2.0 Stocks on mediocre efficiency. He was a surefire top-tier prospect from this last draft except he had question marks regarding his effort level during his 2nd NCAA season on a middling team.
Meanwhile, Walker Kessler was 1 year older as a rookie and, even in year 3, his fans here and other places are clamoring that he is worth an arm and a leg.
For exactly one month, Ware has been a 12/10/1.2 guys with 2.0 Stocks on mediocre efficiency. He was a surefire top-tier prospect from this last draft except he had question marks regarding his effort level during his 2nd NCAA season on a middling team.
Meanwhile, Walker Kessler was 1 year older as a rookie and, even in year 3, his fans here and other places are clamoring that he is worth an arm and a leg.
Re: Phoenix Retool without Tanking (ORL and MIA)
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 57,303
- And1: 18,409
- Joined: Jun 23, 2001
-
Re: Phoenix Retool without Tanking (ORL and MIA)
I don't see Miami trading Ware for a 37 year old Durant. I, personally, hope we stay away from him altogether. We don't have the infrastructure in place, after the trade, to utilize his exceptionally limited window.
Return to Trades and Transactions