Jeff Schwartz via Shams: Los Angeles Lakers should not have failed Mark Williams on his physical

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

JVFRMN
Freshman
Posts: 88
And1: 159
Joined: Jul 02, 2019
   

Re: Jeff Schwartz via Shams: Los Angeles Lakers should not have failed Mark Williams on his physical 

Post#41 » by JVFRMN » Thu Feb 20, 2025 8:21 pm

Invictus88 wrote:
facothomas22 wrote:
ConSarnit wrote:
Every report that came out has stated that the Lakers did not back out because of William's previous injuries but due to other issues. These would have been issues they were unaware of and discovered during their own testing. The Lakers and Hornets could also have differing perspectives based on long term outlooks. If the Hornets think Williams will be healthy over the next 2-3 years that doesn't really align with the Lakers goals who probably are interested in William's health outlook over the next 4-5 years (or beyond).

Also, I don't understand why the Laker's would back out of this trade based on public sentiment when public sentiment was evenly split on the Williams trade. The Lakers weren't getting destroyed in the media or by their fans over this trade. Even the sentiment on this board was split 50/50. I don't buy the backing out excuse at all, especially given the massive PR high the Lakers were riding on from the Luka trade.



The question is what other issues did he have that wasn't already known? Why not be more transparent if that's really the case? Based on Mark Williams recent about the fact he was surprised he failed his physical and and based on this report, I feel it's much more likely the Lakers failed Mark Williams physical because they knew they grossly overpaid to get him and had buyers remorse. It wouldn't surprise me at all if the Lakers GM order the medical staff to fail Mark Williams for stuff that has nothing to do with his physical and if that's the case, the NBA needs to hand out severe consequences against the Lakers.


I'm trying hard to believe you aren't aware of patient privacy / confidentiality concerns? A person going to any doctor's office has to sign forms even to allow them to discuss your condition with their colleagues for assisting in a diagnosis.

Being 'transparent' in terms of letting the general public know the condition is completely out of bounds. But don't let that lack of information stop you from then crafting wild unsubstantiated theories and then trying to pass them off as being factual.

You won´t find it so hard when you realize he's just a troll.
User avatar
druggas
General Manager
Posts: 7,596
And1: 6,014
Joined: Dec 27, 2007

Re: Jeff Schwartz via Shams: Los Angeles Lakers should not have failed Mark Williams on his physical 

Post#42 » by druggas » Thu Feb 20, 2025 8:41 pm

JVFRMN wrote:
Invictus88 wrote:
facothomas22 wrote:

The question is what other issues did he have that wasn't already known? Why not be more transparent if that's really the case? Based on Mark Williams recent about the fact he was surprised he failed his physical and and based on this report, I feel it's much more likely the Lakers failed Mark Williams physical because they knew they grossly overpaid to get him and had buyers remorse. It wouldn't surprise me at all if the Lakers GM order the medical staff to fail Mark Williams for stuff that has nothing to do with his physical and if that's the case, the NBA needs to hand out severe consequences against the Lakers.


I'm trying hard to believe you aren't aware of patient privacy / confidentiality concerns? A person going to any doctor's office has to sign forms even to allow them to discuss your condition with their colleagues for assisting in a diagnosis.

Being 'transparent' in terms of letting the general public know the condition is completely out of bounds. But don't let that lack of information stop you from then crafting wild unsubstantiated theories and then trying to pass them off as being factual.

You won´t find it so hard when you realize he's just a troll.

Amen.
User avatar
azcatz11
RealGM
Posts: 31,230
And1: 34,937
Joined: Apr 13, 2017
Location: Phoenix
     

Re: Jeff Schwartz via Shams: Los Angeles Lakers should not have failed Mark Williams on his physical 

Post#43 » by azcatz11 » Thu Feb 20, 2025 8:45 pm

This is honestly only a story because it involves the Lakers. This stuff happens every year. Cam Whitmore was red flagged by multiple teams before dropping to Houston. As anyone knows who's been involved within the medical community - the doctor's don't know everything and there is always a grey area.
Praying for Burrow
Up-And-Coming
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,676
And1: 4,014
Joined: Jul 21, 2015
       

Re: Jeff Schwartz via Shams: Los Angeles Lakers should not have failed Mark Williams on his physical 

Post#44 » by Up-And-Coming » Thu Feb 20, 2025 8:57 pm

Jeff Schwartz is Mark William's agent and has every financial incentive to downplay his potential physical concerns in hopes of getting paid as much as possible on his next contract.
hugepatsfan
General Manager
Posts: 8,883
And1: 9,347
Joined: May 28, 2020
       

Re: Jeff Schwartz via Shams: Los Angeles Lakers should not have failed Mark Williams on his physical 

Post#45 » by hugepatsfan » Thu Feb 20, 2025 9:01 pm

azcatz11 wrote:This is honestly only a story because it involves the Lakers. This stuff happens every year. Cam Whitmore was red flagged by multiple teams before dropping to Houston. As anyone knows who's been involved within the medical community - the doctor's don't know everything and there is always a grey area.


Deals made on deadline day get rescinded days later because of failed physicals? No, that's not really true. It's pretty rare for any deal to actually get rescinded based on failed physicals, never mind the unique deadline day dynamics here.

It probably is a bit more of a story now because it resulted in a team with two top 10 players that thought they had a center now not having a center. There's big competitive implications to it. But it's also a unique and rare circumstance on its own.
LordCovington33
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,383
And1: 5,223
Joined: Nov 15, 2016
   

Re: Jeff Schwartz via Shams: Los Angeles Lakers should not have failed Mark Williams on his physical 

Post#46 » by LordCovington33 » Thu Feb 20, 2025 9:17 pm

Hitman88 wrote:[x]
Read on Twitter
[/x]

anonymous doctors
ConSarnit
Head Coach
Posts: 6,200
And1: 5,912
Joined: May 05, 2015
 

Re: Jeff Schwartz via Shams: Los Angeles Lakers should not have failed Mark Williams on his physical 

Post#47 » by ConSarnit » Thu Feb 20, 2025 9:43 pm

JVFRMN wrote:
Invictus88 wrote:
facothomas22 wrote:

The question is what other issues did he have that wasn't already known? Why not be more transparent if that's really the case? Based on Mark Williams recent about the fact he was surprised he failed his physical and and based on this report, I feel it's much more likely the Lakers failed Mark Williams physical because they knew they grossly overpaid to get him and had buyers remorse. It wouldn't surprise me at all if the Lakers GM order the medical staff to fail Mark Williams for stuff that has nothing to do with his physical and if that's the case, the NBA needs to hand out severe consequences against the Lakers.


I'm trying hard to believe you aren't aware of patient privacy / confidentiality concerns? A person going to any doctor's office has to sign forms even to allow them to discuss your condition with their colleagues for assisting in a diagnosis.

Being 'transparent' in terms of letting the general public know the condition is completely out of bounds. But don't let that lack of information stop you from then crafting wild unsubstantiated theories and then trying to pass them off as being factual.

You won´t find it so hard when you realize he's just a troll.


Not sure why I engaged. Faco is the same poster who said AD had negative trade value a couple of years ago.
User avatar
The Laker Kid
General Manager
Posts: 9,539
And1: 7,058
Joined: Dec 16, 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: Jeff Schwartz via Shams: Los Angeles Lakers should not have failed Mark Williams on his physical 

Post#48 » by The Laker Kid » Thu Feb 20, 2025 9:46 pm

It's in the Lakers' best interest to complete this trade. It doesn't make sense for them to back out of the deal and force their fans to cheer for Alex Len.
MaxwellSmart wrote:I hate to say this, but Go Lakers....
tamaraw08
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,703
And1: 2,116
Joined: Feb 13, 2019
     

Re: Jeff Schwartz via Shams: Los Angeles Lakers should not have failed Mark Williams on his physical 

Post#49 » by tamaraw08 » Thu Feb 20, 2025 10:56 pm

facothomas22 wrote:
tamaraw08 wrote:
facothomas22 wrote:Yeah the NBA should step in and investigate this. Something tells the Lakers did something very shady and the GM Ordered the medical staff to fail Mark Williams physical to order to justify backing out of the trade


You really think the Medical Professionals who did all these tests/scans would risk losing their licenses to make up bogus results just because the Lakers asked them to?
From Radiology/MRI techs, Licensed Radiologists, Orthopedic Specialists, Sports Medicine team Doctors? really?



We know teams do shady stuff all the time and are simply hoping the NBA doesn't find out. The Lakers knew he had a injury history before they traded for him. I doubt anything actually showed up that wasn't already known to the public. Teams can fail a player physical based on they deemed to be necessary. The only way you can fail a player physical is they have additional serious medical issues that wasn't already known before. I don't see any evidence that leads us to that. I believe the Lakers simply had cold feet and wanted to save their remaining picks,so they made a excuse to back out of a agreed upon deal.


The Lakers franchise has been in the league for 77 seasons and have made countless trades ever since and how many times have this team backed out and rescinded from those transactions?
It's not just them because there will be a repercussion if teams do it unless there are legitimate reasons.
Shams Charania reported that Charlotte were planning the protest but Silvers said there was no protest, which reveals they have the right to do so but didn't follow through, why?
They could have EASILY showed Scan results that can prove he is completely healthy but did not.
League can actually hire independent Physicians to actually determine the TRUTH but again Charlotte DECIDED not to protest.
Mark Williams is so young and good when he plays. The 7-0 freakish long guy is just 23 years old and if he plays at least 60 games in the next 7-8 years or so, then that 2031 pick would be so low and meaningless but here's the problem.
Mark has only played less than 38% of the games his first 2 years
AND 29 games of the possible 53 games this season.
User avatar
Dominator83
RealGM
Posts: 21,201
And1: 32,463
Joined: Jan 16, 2005
Location: NBA Hell

Re: Jeff Schwartz via Shams: Los Angeles Lakers should not have failed Mark Williams on his physical 

Post#50 » by Dominator83 » Thu Feb 20, 2025 11:34 pm

He's out tonight for "injury management".

The Bobcats sure aren't trying very hard to convince anyone he's fine lol
Fantasy Hoops/Football/Baseball fans..

For info on a forum that actually talks Fantasy sports and not spammed with soliciting leagues, PM me. The more the merrier !
doogie_hauser
Head Coach
Posts: 6,077
And1: 7,234
Joined: Feb 04, 2024
         

Re: Jeff Schwartz via Shams: Los Angeles Lakers should not have failed Mark Williams on his physical 

Post#51 » by doogie_hauser » Thu Feb 20, 2025 11:49 pm

I can only hope Mark Williams finally stays healthy and becomes a decent player for The Hornets
User avatar
Fadeaway_Jumper
Rookie
Posts: 1,154
And1: 3,088
Joined: Feb 06, 2014
   

Re: Jeff Schwartz via Shams: Los Angeles Lakers should not have failed Mark Williams on his physical 

Post#52 » by Fadeaway_Jumper » Thu Feb 20, 2025 11:55 pm

I think the failed physical thing was a last minute excuse that the league let our team get away with.

When you have chronically injured guys like Bradley Beal, Ben Simmons and friggen Kawhi Leonard somehow pass a physical and get traded, there’s no way Williams who just played significant minutes last night, not get through
CIN-C-STAR
General Manager
Posts: 8,419
And1: 18,275
Joined: Dec 17, 2017

Re: Jeff Schwartz via Shams: Los Angeles Lakers should not have failed Mark Williams on his physical 

Post#53 » by CIN-C-STAR » Fri Feb 21, 2025 12:25 am

tamaraw08 wrote:
facothomas22 wrote:Yeah the NBA should step in and investigate this. Something tells the Lakers did something very shady and the GM Ordered the medical staff to fail Mark Williams physical to order to justify backing out of the trade


You really think the Medical Professionals who did all these tests/scans would risk losing their licenses to make up bogus results just because the Lakers asked them to?
From Radiology/MRI techs, Licensed Radiologists, Orthopedic Specialists, Sports Medicine team Doctors? really?


They wouldn’t need to make up any results though.
Just say they have “significant” concerns rather than “moderate” concerns and that’s enough.
Those are subjective distinctions so it really wouldn’t risk anything for them much less losing their license :roll:
"I'd rather have Kevin Love spacing out to the three point line than anything (Karl) Malone brings"
:lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
JDR720
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 44,207
And1: 45,803
Joined: Jul 09, 2013
     

Re: Jeff Schwartz via Shams: Los Angeles Lakers should not have failed Mark Williams on his physical 

Post#54 » by JDR720 » Fri Feb 21, 2025 12:26 am

Dominator83 wrote:He's out tonight for "injury management".

The Bobcats sure aren't trying very hard to convince anyone he's fine lol

He's not been playing back to back games this whole season.
User avatar
Dr Aki
RealGM
Posts: 35,776
And1: 32,123
Joined: Mar 03, 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
   

Re: Jeff Schwartz via Shams: Los Angeles Lakers should not have failed Mark Williams on his physical 

Post#55 » by Dr Aki » Fri Feb 21, 2025 12:29 am

Agent sticks up for his client

More news at 11
Image
Pointgod
RealGM
Posts: 24,079
And1: 24,405
Joined: Jun 28, 2014

Re: Jeff Schwartz via Shams: Los Angeles Lakers should not have failed Mark Williams on his physical 

Post#56 » by Pointgod » Fri Feb 21, 2025 12:33 am

KyRo23 wrote:Not sure what to do with this information. Why? What did the other doctors see? What did the Lakers see?

There is literally no information, I'm not sure what we are to gather from Shams here


Literally the only opinion that matters is the Lakers doctors and Lakers organization because they’re taking on all of the risk. Having Swartz weigh in is kind of irrelevant.
og15
Forum Mod - Clippers
Forum Mod - Clippers
Posts: 50,984
And1: 33,795
Joined: Jun 23, 2004
Location: NBA Fan
 

Re: Jeff Schwartz via Shams: Los Angeles Lakers should not have failed Mark Williams on his physical 

Post#57 » by og15 » Fri Feb 21, 2025 12:35 am

Fadeaway_Jumper wrote:I think the failed physical thing was a last minute excuse that the league let our team get away with.

When you have chronically injured guys like Bradley Beal, Ben Simmons and friggen Kawhi Leonard somehow pass a physical and get traded, there’s no way Williams who just played significant minutes last night, not get through
Physicals are about the risk a team is willing to take and about possible long term issues. Some guys are injury prone but with no specific possible long term issue.

Also the teams know those players history and are trading them with that in mind, so it's about if you find anything you DIDN'T already know about, because now you have access to all medical records as well as to the player. Then after that it is about the risk you're willing to take. Teams obviously are more willing to take a risk on star level guys with injury concerns depending on the situation.
User avatar
Dominator83
RealGM
Posts: 21,201
And1: 32,463
Joined: Jan 16, 2005
Location: NBA Hell

Re: Jeff Schwartz via Shams: Los Angeles Lakers should not have failed Mark Williams on his physical 

Post#58 » by Dominator83 » Fri Feb 21, 2025 12:44 am

JDR720 wrote:
Dominator83 wrote:He's out tonight for "injury management".

The Bobcats sure aren't trying very hard to convince anyone he's fine lol

He's not been playing back to back games this whole season.


For an injury that was how long ago??

If i were them, i would be playing him every game, 30 mins a game, to prove my point that hes fully healthy and the Lakers were full of it.

Unless, hes not very healthy and the Hornets knew they were trying to sell damaged goods
Fantasy Hoops/Football/Baseball fans..

For info on a forum that actually talks Fantasy sports and not spammed with soliciting leagues, PM me. The more the merrier !
User avatar
Dominator83
RealGM
Posts: 21,201
And1: 32,463
Joined: Jan 16, 2005
Location: NBA Hell

Re: Jeff Schwartz via Shams: Los Angeles Lakers should not have failed Mark Williams on his physical 

Post#59 » by Dominator83 » Fri Feb 21, 2025 12:57 am

facothomas22 wrote:
TheGeneral99 wrote:I mean this isn't controversial.

He's a very talented player who has been riddled by injuries his entire career so far and they determined in the long-term he's a huge liability.

He missed 60 games last year and has already missed half of this season.

The Lakers probably determined he likely would be riddled by injuries for the rest of his career based on what they found out.



The issue here is that they already knew he had a injury history. Shouldn't have made the trade to begin with if they were so concerned. You can't just agreed to do a trade on principle, only to back out after you realised you overpayed. It's quite the Lakers failed Mark Williams physicals on purpose in order to justify backing out of the trade.The NBA needs to investigate this and make a example out of them in order to make it loud and clear to the other 29 teams in the NBA that you can't just back out of trade after you already agreed to do the deal to begin with.

The Grizzlies backed out of an agreed to trade, claiming they were confused as to which Brooks they were trading :lol:

Which was proven BS considering that prior to everyone agreeing, medical records were exchanged. The Grizzlies forked over the requested medicals for DILLON Brooks. after the trade they claimed they thought it was Marshon Brooks :lol: and backed out.

They weren't even made an example out of and that was straight up shady, especially over Dillon effing Brooks whos JAG anyway.
Fantasy Hoops/Football/Baseball fans..

For info on a forum that actually talks Fantasy sports and not spammed with soliciting leagues, PM me. The more the merrier !
User avatar
Tha Cynic
RealGM
Posts: 26,607
And1: 28,472
Joined: Jan 03, 2006
Location: Starin' at the world through my rearview
     

Re: Jeff Schwartz via Shams: Los Angeles Lakers should not have failed Mark Williams on his physical 

Post#60 » by Tha Cynic » Fri Feb 21, 2025 12:59 am

Woodsanity wrote:They wouldn't fail him without reason. He is damaged goods most likely.


Unless they had buyer’s remorse lol. They basically gave up all their assets for him.
Kobe Bryant:You asked for my hustle - I gave you my heart, because it came with so much more."~Kobe #MambaOut

Return to The General Board