PhilBlackson wrote:Indeed wrote:AkelaLoneWolf wrote:that team's success is dependent on Mathurin and other young players. Turner is vastly overrated.
The team's success is dependent on being a tax team (with reasonable value to salary contracts). Pacers adding another star and level to the other tax teams would be in the top 3 conversation.
Not sure I necessarily agree with that...I think a big part of the Pacers' success is their depth.
If the Pacers were to acquire another star they'd likely have to give up an exceptional amount of that depth and then would a small market really come out of pocket to keep completely maxed out Hali, Pascal and whatever 3rd star because they certainly aren't taking a discount because they love the city of Indiana lol....AND they somehow keep Myles Turner who is looking at likely his last big payday??!?
I highly doubt seeing that happen personally and quite frankly I'm interested to see even they can even hang on to Turner, nevermind actually going out an acquiring more.
They are being cheap and don't want to go over the tax.
It is not how they need to give up on depth, it is how much they are willing to go over and being close to the other 3 teams (around 20m, assuming Cleveland will have to pay Mobley)
If they replace Nesmith (11m) and Walker (6m) for someone with 39m, that would be Ingram salary. Trade may not able to do that, but the fact is that they are being cheap without trying to.