ImageImageImageImageImage

PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging...

Moderators: j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36

User avatar
3toheadmelo
RealGM
Posts: 95,015
And1: 136,125
Joined: Feb 15, 2015
 

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#121 » by 3toheadmelo » Sun Feb 23, 2025 9:19 pm

Read on Twitter
Image
It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect it
LFGK
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,840
And1: 1,479
Joined: Apr 24, 2024
       

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#122 » by LFGK » Sun Feb 23, 2025 9:21 pm

spree2kawhi wrote:
BadNewsBarnes wrote:Every friggen game we get burned by our 3-pt defense. Is anyone sick of this by now?

You cannot guard threes and help down low. We need a shot-blocker (back). This isn’t hard to understand.



Please don't make common sense posts. We rather blame the coach, says the team sucks, GM sucks, MSG Sucks
User avatar
TKKnicks1
Head Coach
Posts: 6,550
And1: 5,838
Joined: Jun 28, 2002
Location: Dallas
 

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#123 » by TKKnicks1 » Sun Feb 23, 2025 9:22 pm

NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
TheGreenArrow wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g

Lmaooo WTF man!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



:lol: :lol: :lol:


This is comical, these guys have to be protected from themselves.


This goes back to my previous post about this team winning games 90% on talent and 10% on coaching. Thibs gives free reigns to his stars and they absolutely love playing for him cuz of it. There no actual coaching going on here besides go out there and perform.
Fire Thibs!
LFGK
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,840
And1: 1,479
Joined: Apr 24, 2024
       

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#124 » by LFGK » Sun Feb 23, 2025 9:25 pm

3toheadmelo wrote:
Read on Twitter


Stupid comment, laughing at Towns but he's putting up 25-13(second league in REB) people just wanna blow things out of proportion and make stupid claims....let the knee jerk reactions keep coming in, Mitch next to KAT cleans up a lot of his shortcomings but nobody wants to wait and see...they want to win every game, people say let's lose games to see what we have but having a breakdown when we try to win games but lose, stupid fan as we have man, very frustrating.
User avatar
Chanel Bomber
RealGM
Posts: 23,902
And1: 42,013
Joined: Sep 20, 2018
 

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#125 » by Chanel Bomber » Sun Feb 23, 2025 9:26 pm

3toheadmelo wrote:
Read on Twitter

They gutted that for Bridges.

You have your thoughts on which position KAT should be playing and that's a fair basketball discussion.

But we traded two vets and just one protected pick for KAT. Despite some of his deficiencies, I think 90% of people would agree he's an upgrade over Randle and Divo.

The Mikal trade and the KAT trade are not the same, and lumping them together is a mistake imo.

It's the Mikal trade that effs us. Because we lost the flexibility to either trade for a superstar or hit reset as needed. The return on investment is SO weak.
User avatar
Iron Mantis
RealGM
Posts: 27,110
And1: 27,787
Joined: Aug 12, 2006

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#126 » by Iron Mantis » Sun Feb 23, 2025 9:26 pm

I'm going to need more out of OG and Deuce; Consistency on offense. And better transition defense.

KAT and Hart were the only ones rebounding. KAT finished with 24 PTS 18 REBS and was 3/4 from 3, and had the best +/- out of all starters. -1 in a 13 pt loss.

Knicks as a team were hitting at 3's at a respectable clip(39%) and should have taken at least 44 total...matching the Celtics attempts. But they only took 36, and Josh didn't even attempt one....
Image
User avatar
TKKnicks1
Head Coach
Posts: 6,550
And1: 5,838
Joined: Jun 28, 2002
Location: Dallas
 

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#127 » by TKKnicks1 » Sun Feb 23, 2025 9:26 pm

I want to go on record to say I got no knee jerk reactions here. I've been on the fire Thibs club since last season.
Fire Thibs!
User avatar
TheGreenArrow
RealGM
Posts: 27,363
And1: 42,749
Joined: Sep 13, 2017

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#128 » by TheGreenArrow » Sun Feb 23, 2025 9:28 pm

Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g

Pain!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
nykballa2k4
RealGM
Posts: 31,081
And1: 7,451
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Location: Kurt Rhombus is managing the defense...
       

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#129 » by nykballa2k4 » Sun Feb 23, 2025 9:32 pm

Guano wrote:
Read on Twitter

Need to find a way to make him step into being the #3 on this team. Can't afford for him to keep being a worse version of Donte.
His defense has been mediocre, and I know it's partially because there is no one behind him and because he logs a ton of time and never sits out.
Gotta figure out to make him the best version of himself.
Numbers don't lie, people who use them do
Stand up to all hate
Stand up to Jewish hate
User avatar
robillionaire
RealGM
Posts: 39,751
And1: 57,046
Joined: Jul 12, 2015
Location: Asheville
     

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#130 » by robillionaire » Sun Feb 23, 2025 9:33 pm

Chanel Bomber wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:
Read on Twitter

They gutted that for Bridges.

You have your thoughts on which position KAT should be playing and that's a fair basketball discussion.

But we traded two vets and just one protected pick for KAT. Despite some of his deficiencies, I think 90% of people would agree he's an upgrade over Randle and Divo.

The Mikal trade and the KAT trade are not the same, and lumping them together is a mistake imo.

It's the Mikal trade that effs us. Because we lost the flexibility to either trade for a superstar or hit reset as needed. The return on investment is SO weak.


Even he’s sitting here saying we should trade towns for Giannis which is an acknowledgement that an all star starter still has a ton of value. What is Minnesota getting for Randle if anything? Even if we ultimately don’t win with him he’s an asset.

Mikal probably has some trade value too but it can’t be anything in the same galaxy of what we paid. We are likely holding Brooklyn’s bags on that for the next 6 years

Also where is this “abundance of young talent” lol

Ban twitter posts
nykballa2k4
RealGM
Posts: 31,081
And1: 7,451
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Location: Kurt Rhombus is managing the defense...
       

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#131 » by nykballa2k4 » Sun Feb 23, 2025 9:34 pm

TKKnicks1 wrote:I want to go on record to say I got no knee jerk reactions here. I've been on the fire Thibs club since last season.


It's been apparent all season we have a mismatch between coach and team on the court. Eating against weak competition has given us a false sense of security.
Numbers don't lie, people who use them do
Stand up to all hate
Stand up to Jewish hate
User avatar
robillionaire
RealGM
Posts: 39,751
And1: 57,046
Joined: Jul 12, 2015
Location: Asheville
     

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#132 » by robillionaire » Sun Feb 23, 2025 9:35 pm

nykballa2k4 wrote:
Guano wrote:
Read on Twitter

Need to find a way to make him step into being the #3 on this team. Can't afford for him to keep being a worse version of Donte.
His defense has been mediocre, and I know it's partially because there is no one behind him and because he logs a ton of time and never sits out.
Gotta figure out to make him the best version of himself.


The sad thing about him is that he plays so timidly. He is afraid to go to the rim. Would rather shoot a fadeaway jumper on a fast break. Maybe he should watch some Josh hart film. It’s frustrating how soft he plays at times.
User avatar
Gravy
Head Coach
Posts: 6,998
And1: 9,410
Joined: Jun 25, 2015
     

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#133 » by Gravy » Sun Feb 23, 2025 9:36 pm

Could have won with better defense, hopefully Mitch makes us look closer to last year. KAT at center is bad against every team but we can overcome it. The top three teams are good enough to exploit him. He was getting outworked by Kornet.
User avatar
NoDopeOnSundays
RealGM
Posts: 26,994
And1: 55,924
Joined: Nov 22, 2005
         

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#134 » by NoDopeOnSundays » Sun Feb 23, 2025 9:37 pm

robillionaire wrote:
nykballa2k4 wrote:
Guano wrote:
Read on Twitter

Need to find a way to make him step into being the #3 on this team. Can't afford for him to keep being a worse version of Donte.
His defense has been mediocre, and I know it's partially because there is no one behind him and because he logs a ton of time and never sits out.
Gotta figure out to make him the best version of himself.


The sad thing about him is that he plays so timidly. He is afraid to go to the rim. Would rather shoot a fadeaway jumper on a fast break. Maybe he should watch some Josh hart film. It’s frustrating how soft he plays at times.




He's shooting a career low from the freethrow line, I think he avoids contact because he doesn't think he can make them.
LFGK
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,840
And1: 1,479
Joined: Apr 24, 2024
       

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#135 » by LFGK » Sun Feb 23, 2025 9:38 pm

TheGreenArrow wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g

Pain!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


I mean if 2 years ago u said divo would do what he did last year people would laugh. He was good, very good hard nosed but how about we wait for the playoffs to come around and see what we get from KAT and this team? You don't think KAT will have a signature moment in the playoffs, Sh*t tightens up come playoff time(defensively), we have our big man in the middle coming back and let's not forget what he's done in the playoffs the last 2 seasons. This team is going to be fine, the sky is not falling
User avatar
Enzo954
Starter
Posts: 2,284
And1: 3,516
Joined: Jul 09, 2014

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#136 » by Enzo954 » Sun Feb 23, 2025 9:39 pm

I've never seen a poster continually trash a select few players as swiftly and consistently as 3toheadmelo. It's almost like he's a bot.
User avatar
3toheadmelo
RealGM
Posts: 95,015
And1: 136,125
Joined: Feb 15, 2015
 

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#137 » by 3toheadmelo » Sun Feb 23, 2025 9:39 pm

Chanel Bomber wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:
Read on Twitter

They gutted that for Bridges.

You have your thoughts on which position KAT should be playing and that's a fair basketball discussion.

But we traded two vets and just one protected pick for KAT. Despite some of his deficiencies, I think 90% of people would agree he's an upgrade over Randle and Divo.

The Mikal trade and the KAT trade are not the same, and lumping them together is a mistake imo.

It's the Mikal trade that effs us. Because we lost the flexibility to either trade for a superstar or hit reset as needed. The return on investment is SO weak.

KAT is a beast on offense but he's been a massive liability against the elite teams. I'm losing confidence in him. Randle is actually trending right now on twitter and people saying we should've kept him :lol: but forget about that. I just don't know how we can win with KAT when he's been a no show against the elite teams, and they keep targeting him on switches, pick and rolls, nowhere to be found closing out or protecting the rim. He looks clueless out there. And he struggles scoring on teams that put smaller players on him. I am just hoping we can at least mitigate his bad defense with another big. Problem is that we don't really have a reliable one since Mitch is hurt and Huk might not be ready.

Mikal's trade def hurts us more, no disagreement there. We gave up way too much value for him.
Image
It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect it
User avatar
robillionaire
RealGM
Posts: 39,751
And1: 57,046
Joined: Jul 12, 2015
Location: Asheville
     

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#138 » by robillionaire » Sun Feb 23, 2025 9:40 pm

NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
robillionaire wrote:
nykballa2k4 wrote:Need to find a way to make him step into being the #3 on this team. Can't afford for him to keep being a worse version of Donte.
His defense has been mediocre, and I know it's partially because there is no one behind him and because he logs a ton of time and never sits out.
Gotta figure out to make him the best version of himself.


The sad thing about him is that he plays so timidly. He is afraid to go to the rim. Would rather shoot a fadeaway jumper on a fast break. Maybe he should watch some Josh hart film. It’s frustrating how soft he plays at times.




He's shooting a career low from the freethrow line, I think he avoids contact because he doesn't think he can make them.


Well not only that he is shooting 1.1 attempts a game which is also a career low. Guess how many attempts he had tonight? 0

74.2% isn’t THAT bad. He’s not Mitchell Robinson. That can’t be what it is. I’m still saying he is afraid of contact

All the minutes played and he’s had 62 free throws ALL SEASON
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#139 » by Clyde_Style » Sun Feb 23, 2025 9:40 pm

Image
User avatar
Chanel Bomber
RealGM
Posts: 23,902
And1: 42,013
Joined: Sep 20, 2018
 

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#140 » by Chanel Bomber » Sun Feb 23, 2025 9:43 pm

3toheadmelo wrote:
Chanel Bomber wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:
Read on Twitter

They gutted that for Bridges.

You have your thoughts on which position KAT should be playing and that's a fair basketball discussion.

But we traded two vets and just one protected pick for KAT. Despite some of his deficiencies, I think 90% of people would agree he's an upgrade over Randle and Divo.

The Mikal trade and the KAT trade are not the same, and lumping them together is a mistake imo.

It's the Mikal trade that effs us. Because we lost the flexibility to either trade for a superstar or hit reset as needed. The return on investment is SO weak.

KAT is a beast on offense but he's been a massive liability against the elite teams. I'm losing confidence in him. Randle is actually trending right now on twitter and people saying we should've kept him :lol: but forget about that. I just don't know how we can win with KAT when he's been a no show against the elite teams, and they keep targeting him on switches, pick and rolls, nowhere to be found closing out or protecting the rim. He looks clueless out there. And he struggles scoring on teams that put smaller players on him. I am just hoping we can at least mitigate his bad defense with another big. Problem is that we don't really have a reliable one since Mitch is hurt and Huk might not be ready.

Mikal's trade def hurts us more, no disagreement there. We gave up way too much value for him.

You pay too much attention to Twitter bro :lol:

KAT is a better player than Randle.

Randle is also a weak defender, and was a weak defender for us after the 2020-21 season. Defense isn't really an argument against the trade.

This isn't to say KAT doesn't have flaws because he does.

Return to New York Knicks