ImageImageImageImageImage

PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging...

Moderators: HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi

HEZI
RealGM
Posts: 43,056
And1: 29,248
Joined: Nov 16, 2004
 

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#361 » by HEZI » Mon Feb 24, 2025 4:09 pm

god shammgod wrote:The Cavs were kids 2 years ago. There was some improvement that obviously had nothing to do with coaching.


Not just that but Garland had a broken jaw which caused him to miss like 2 months and lost 12 lbs because he was drinking through a straw. Obviously you aren’t going to be at your peak performance after an injury like that.

Evan Mobley is still only 23 years old but hes certainly gotten better now. Would have happened regardless

Their depth is without question much better. They have a legit 6MOY candidate in Ty Jerome and added another player who would start on most teams in Deandre Hunter. Their depth has improved a ton
DENVER NUGGETS
Jamal Murray/Ty Jerome/Dante Exum
Zach Lavine/Ayo Dosunmu/Corey Kispert
Aaron Gordon/Harrison Barnes/Isaac Okoro
Jakob Poeltl/Moussa Diabate/Karlo Matkovic
Ivica Zubac/Nick Richards/Oscar Tshiebwe
User avatar
mpharris36
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 112,276
And1: 115,984
Joined: Nov 03, 2010
     

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#362 » by mpharris36 » Mon Feb 24, 2025 4:09 pm

god shammgod wrote:
Fury wrote:
god shammgod wrote:The Cavs were kids 2 years ago. There was some improvement that obviously had nothing to do with coaching.


Like what

Like their young players got better obviously


so all just internal player development? The knicks and cavs avg age is nearly identical.

Just last year they were 16th in the league in OFF and 12th in the league in NET rating

And now they are 1st in the league in OFF and 2nd in the league in NET rating.

Its all because Mobley has gotten better? (btw his offensive EFF has went from 63% to 64% so not a crazy jump).

Atkinson get no credit for there massive jump?
4-Peat! 22-25 BAF Champion Spurs:

ROSTER

Walker Kessler/Daniel Gafford/Adem Bona
Nikola Jokic/Santi Aldama/Isaiah Stewart
Aaron Nesmith/Josh Hart/Jaime Jaquez
Alex Caruso/Keon Ellis/Justin Champagnie
Steph Curry/Chris Paul/Ryan Rollins
User avatar
mpharris36
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 112,276
And1: 115,984
Joined: Nov 03, 2010
     

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#363 » by mpharris36 » Mon Feb 24, 2025 4:11 pm

HEZI wrote:
Their depth is without question much better. They have a legit 6MOY candidate in Ty Jerome and added another player who would start on most teams in Deandre Hunter. Their depth has improved a ton



Ty Jerome is 27 years old and is on his 4th team in 6 years. He was on the Cavs last year and bickerstaff never played him. So all of Ty Jerome's development just happened in the offseason? Or he found a coach that utilizes his skills within there offense?
4-Peat! 22-25 BAF Champion Spurs:

ROSTER

Walker Kessler/Daniel Gafford/Adem Bona
Nikola Jokic/Santi Aldama/Isaiah Stewart
Aaron Nesmith/Josh Hart/Jaime Jaquez
Alex Caruso/Keon Ellis/Justin Champagnie
Steph Curry/Chris Paul/Ryan Rollins
User avatar
Red Vines
RealGM
Posts: 34,768
And1: 10,078
Joined: Jun 26, 2005
     

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#364 » by Red Vines » Mon Feb 24, 2025 4:14 pm

In hindsight this team needed a vocal Draymond type defensive floor leader to be a contender this year. But Thibs has shown he's not able to maximize our offensive talent anyway, too many times we struggle to get the ball up the floor against pressure and get open shots. Whatever Thibs is trying it just looks like the team stopped buying in, we need a new coach this summer. After that I would figure out how get OG to take a leadership role on defense and figure out if KAT can clean up his sloppy defense or not. This team still has a lot of untapped potential imo.
User avatar
dakomish23
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 58,766
And1: 48,738
Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Location: Empire State
     

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#365 » by dakomish23 » Mon Feb 24, 2025 4:21 pm

DOT wrote:
Spree2Houston wrote:Yup Mobley was 21 and Garland was 23. Now both are all-stars.

Garland made an all star team at 22. Also Mobley was 3rd in DPOY voting in 2023.


Everyone covering CLE was wondering if they were going to trade Garland after he cratered & thought Mobley would never meet his potential.

This myth that "They just finally blossomed on their own " is insane. The coach changing their entire system had nothing to do with that? :rofl2:
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor


#FreeJimmit
JayTWill
Starter
Posts: 2,430
And1: 1,611
Joined: May 14, 2011

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#366 » by JayTWill » Mon Feb 24, 2025 4:23 pm

The amount of hoops some people jump through to protect Thibs and not give another coach credit is wild. What has Thibs done to have this type of blind loyalty? Did things get so dark here that Thibs will be forever hailed as the savior or something?
User avatar
dakomish23
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 58,766
And1: 48,738
Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Location: Empire State
     

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#367 » by dakomish23 » Mon Feb 24, 2025 4:25 pm

What was conveniently left out of the hoops collective discussion on here is that we used drop coverage 48% of the time against BOS, which is the most they've faced that defense by far, and they're scoring 1.3 PPP which is equal to a 133 ORTG.

Coach's decision. But no don't you dare blame him! :rofl2:
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor


#FreeJimmit
User avatar
dakomish23
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 58,766
And1: 48,738
Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Location: Empire State
     

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#368 » by dakomish23 » Mon Feb 24, 2025 4:28 pm

JayTWill wrote:The amount of hoops some people jump through to protect Thibs and not give another coach credit is wild. What has Thibs done to have this type of blind loyalty? Did things get so dark here that Thibs will be forever hailed as the savior or something?


It has nothing to do with Thibs, he's just the fig leaf for the agenda
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor


#FreeJimmit
HEZI
RealGM
Posts: 43,056
And1: 29,248
Joined: Nov 16, 2004
 

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#369 » by HEZI » Mon Feb 24, 2025 4:33 pm

mpharris36 wrote:
HEZI wrote:
Their depth is without question much better. They have a legit 6MOY candidate in Ty Jerome and added another player who would start on most teams in Deandre Hunter. Their depth has improved a ton



Ty Jerome is 27 years old and is on his 4th team in 6 years. He was on the Cavs last year and bickerstaff never played him. So all of Ty Jerome's development just happened in the offseason? Or he found a coach that utilizes his skills within there offense?


He’s been productive whenever given minutes but he’s certainly improved individually as well.
He was getting 18 mpg under Kerr in GS and wasn’t putting up anywhere near his numbers in Cleveland where he still only plays 19 mpg. He’s improved individually.

Why did those other teams cut him if he was so great at that time?
DENVER NUGGETS
Jamal Murray/Ty Jerome/Dante Exum
Zach Lavine/Ayo Dosunmu/Corey Kispert
Aaron Gordon/Harrison Barnes/Isaac Okoro
Jakob Poeltl/Moussa Diabate/Karlo Matkovic
Ivica Zubac/Nick Richards/Oscar Tshiebwe
User avatar
mpharris36
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 112,276
And1: 115,984
Joined: Nov 03, 2010
     

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#370 » by mpharris36 » Mon Feb 24, 2025 4:34 pm

dakomish23 wrote:What was conveniently left out of the hoops collective discussion is that we used drop coverage 48% of the time against BOS, which is the most they've faced that defense by far, and they're scoring 1.3 PPP which is equal to a 133 ORTG.

Coach's decision. But no don't you dare blame him! :rofl2:


running 50% drop vs the team that attempts by far the most 3 pt shots in the league at a top of the league conversion rate is down right insanity!!!

with a big that isn't even good in drop coverage!
4-Peat! 22-25 BAF Champion Spurs:

ROSTER

Walker Kessler/Daniel Gafford/Adem Bona
Nikola Jokic/Santi Aldama/Isaiah Stewart
Aaron Nesmith/Josh Hart/Jaime Jaquez
Alex Caruso/Keon Ellis/Justin Champagnie
Steph Curry/Chris Paul/Ryan Rollins
HEZI
RealGM
Posts: 43,056
And1: 29,248
Joined: Nov 16, 2004
 

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#371 » by HEZI » Mon Feb 24, 2025 4:35 pm

JayTWill wrote:The amount of hoops some people jump through to protect Thibs and not give another coach credit is wild. What has Thibs done to have this type of blind loyalty? Did things get so dark here that Thibs will be forever hailed as the savior or something?


It’s actually quite easy when you make the laziest arguments that are easily refuted by simple truth and reality. It’s you who is jumping through hoops and still end up wrong which is why it’s so funny
DENVER NUGGETS
Jamal Murray/Ty Jerome/Dante Exum
Zach Lavine/Ayo Dosunmu/Corey Kispert
Aaron Gordon/Harrison Barnes/Isaac Okoro
Jakob Poeltl/Moussa Diabate/Karlo Matkovic
Ivica Zubac/Nick Richards/Oscar Tshiebwe
User avatar
DOT
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,397
And1: 61,006
Joined: Nov 25, 2016
         

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#372 » by DOT » Mon Feb 24, 2025 4:36 pm

dakomish23 wrote:
JayTWill wrote:The amount of hoops some people jump through to protect Thibs and not give another coach credit is wild. What has Thibs done to have this type of blind loyalty? Did things get so dark here that Thibs will be forever hailed as the savior or something?


It has nothing to do with Thibs, he's just the fig leaf for the agenda

Basically

It's just trolling. They will freely admit to it too, they don't take anything seriously and just want to mock people for taking things seriously.
BaF Lakers:

Nikola Topic/Kasparas Jakucionis
VJ Edgecombe/Jrue Holiday
Shaedon Sharpe/Cedric Coward
Kyle Filipowski/Collin Murray-Boyles
Alex Sarr/Clint Capela

Bench: Malcolm Brogdon/Hansen Yang/Rocco Zikarsky/RJ Luis Jr.
User avatar
NoDopeOnSundays
RealGM
Posts: 26,960
And1: 55,870
Joined: Nov 22, 2005
         

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#373 » by NoDopeOnSundays » Mon Feb 24, 2025 4:38 pm

The Cavs were 10th in the NBA last season in PnR frequency, they're 2nd this year, they were 22nd in Pace last year, they're 5th this year. Last year Garland and Mitchell averaged 155 touches per game, this year they average 122 per game, last year Mobley was 4th on the team in front court touches, this year he's first. The numbers on how drastically different the team plays now aren't a result of player development :lol:


Guan0 is right, this is debating with climate change deniers.
User avatar
mpharris36
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 112,276
And1: 115,984
Joined: Nov 03, 2010
     

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#374 » by mpharris36 » Mon Feb 24, 2025 4:38 pm

HEZI wrote:
mpharris36 wrote:
HEZI wrote:
Their depth is without question much better. They have a legit 6MOY candidate in Ty Jerome and added another player who would start on most teams in Deandre Hunter. Their depth has improved a ton



Ty Jerome is 27 years old and is on his 4th team in 6 years. He was on the Cavs last year and bickerstaff never played him. So all of Ty Jerome's development just happened in the offseason? Or he found a coach that utilizes his skills within there offense?


He’s been productive whenever given minutes but he’s certainly improved individually as well.
He was getting 18 mpg under Kerr in GS and wasn’t putting up anywhere near his numbers in Cleveland where he still only plays 19 mpg. He’s improved individually.

Why did those other teams cut him if he was so great at that time?


Of course he has improved individually...and development isn't always linear. But in stints in OKC and GS he proved he can score a bit. It was always where does he fit because he really isn't a great defender. But my point remains. He was on CLE last year and never played a lick.

Is that because he was bad last year (and you mentioned earlier the Cavs had more injuries last year so even more reason to have a deeper bench) or is that because the better coach realized he had someone that could play within his system and contribute to the team?
4-Peat! 22-25 BAF Champion Spurs:

ROSTER

Walker Kessler/Daniel Gafford/Adem Bona
Nikola Jokic/Santi Aldama/Isaiah Stewart
Aaron Nesmith/Josh Hart/Jaime Jaquez
Alex Caruso/Keon Ellis/Justin Champagnie
Steph Curry/Chris Paul/Ryan Rollins
User avatar
dakomish23
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 58,766
And1: 48,738
Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Location: Empire State
     

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#375 » by dakomish23 » Mon Feb 24, 2025 4:38 pm

mpharris36 wrote:
dakomish23 wrote:What was conveniently left out of the hoops collective discussion is that we used drop coverage 48% of the time against BOS, which is the most they've faced that defense by far, and they're scoring 1.3 PPP which is equal to a 133 ORTG.

Coach's decision. But no don't you dare blame him! :rofl2:


running 50% drop vs the team that attempts by far the most 3 pt shots in the league at a top of the league conversion rate is down right insanity!!!

with a big that isn't even good in drop coverage!


Has Thibs remotely changed his defensive approach since 2007?
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor


#FreeJimmit
User avatar
dakomish23
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 58,766
And1: 48,738
Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Location: Empire State
     

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#376 » by dakomish23 » Mon Feb 24, 2025 4:40 pm

NoDopeOnSundays wrote:The Cavs were 10th in the NBA last season in PnR frequency, they're 2nd this year, they were 22nd in Pace last year, they're 5th this year. Last year Garland and Mitchell averaged 155 touches per game, this year they average 122 per game, last year Mobley was 4th on the team in front court touches, this year he's first. The numbers on how drastically different the team plays now aren't a result of player development :lol:


Guan0 is right, this is debating with climate change deniers.


"tHeY wOuLd hAvE bEeN tHiS gOod uNdEr BiCKeRsTaFf" We just didn't let the blossoming happen yet :lol: such impatient gardeners :lol:
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor


#FreeJimmit
HEZI
RealGM
Posts: 43,056
And1: 29,248
Joined: Nov 16, 2004
 

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#377 » by HEZI » Mon Feb 24, 2025 4:45 pm

mpharris36 wrote:
HEZI wrote:
mpharris36 wrote:

Ty Jerome is 27 years old and is on his 4th team in 6 years. He was on the Cavs last year and bickerstaff never played him. So all of Ty Jerome's development just happened in the offseason? Or he found a coach that utilizes his skills within there offense?


He’s been productive whenever given minutes but he’s certainly improved individually as well.
He was getting 18 mpg under Kerr in GS and wasn’t putting up anywhere near his numbers in Cleveland where he still only plays 19 mpg. He’s improved individually.

Why did those other teams cut him if he was so great at that time?


Of course he has improved individually...and development isn't always linear. But in stints in OKC and GS he proved he can score a bit. It was always where does he fit because he really isn't a great defender. But my point remains. He was on CLE last year and never played a lick.

Is that because he was bad last year (and you mentioned earlier the Cavs had more injuries last year so even more reason to have a deeper bench) or is that because the better coach realized he had someone that could play within his system and contribute to the team?


He’s basically their Donte

Read on Twitter
?s=46

Thibs has done the same with past players.

What now you think Atkinson is turning Cam Payne into a 50/40/88 6MOY candidate?
DENVER NUGGETS
Jamal Murray/Ty Jerome/Dante Exum
Zach Lavine/Ayo Dosunmu/Corey Kispert
Aaron Gordon/Harrison Barnes/Isaac Okoro
Jakob Poeltl/Moussa Diabate/Karlo Matkovic
Ivica Zubac/Nick Richards/Oscar Tshiebwe
Spree2Houston
Head Coach
Posts: 7,400
And1: 8,819
Joined: Feb 21, 2015
     

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#378 » by Spree2Houston » Mon Feb 24, 2025 4:54 pm

DOT wrote:
Spree2Houston wrote:Yup Mobley was 21 and Garland was 23. Now both are all-stars.

Garland made an all star team at 22. Also Mobley was 3rd in DPOY voting in 2023.


And they got better. Garland turned out to be the best player from his draft and will be a perennial All-Star going forward. Mobley will be the DPOY this season
HEZI
RealGM
Posts: 43,056
And1: 29,248
Joined: Nov 16, 2004
 

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#379 » by HEZI » Mon Feb 24, 2025 4:59 pm

mpharris36 wrote:
dakomish23 wrote:What was conveniently left out of the hoops collective discussion is that we used drop coverage 48% of the time against BOS, which is the most they've faced that defense by far, and they're scoring 1.3 PPP which is equal to a 133 ORTG.

Coach's decision. But no don't you dare blame him! :rofl2:


running 50% drop vs the team that attempts by far the most 3 pt shots in the league at a top of the league conversion rate is down right insanity!!!

with a big that isn't even good in drop coverage!


And yet they made less 3s than their average :rofl:

Seems like there is a bigger issue being ignored here. They hunted us on the interior
DENVER NUGGETS
Jamal Murray/Ty Jerome/Dante Exum
Zach Lavine/Ayo Dosunmu/Corey Kispert
Aaron Gordon/Harrison Barnes/Isaac Okoro
Jakob Poeltl/Moussa Diabate/Karlo Matkovic
Ivica Zubac/Nick Richards/Oscar Tshiebwe
Spree2Houston
Head Coach
Posts: 7,400
And1: 8,819
Joined: Feb 21, 2015
     

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#380 » by Spree2Houston » Mon Feb 24, 2025 5:01 pm

dakomish23 wrote:
DOT wrote:
Spree2Houston wrote:Yup Mobley was 21 and Garland was 23. Now both are all-stars.

Garland made an all star team at 22. Also Mobley was 3rd in DPOY voting in 2023.


Everyone covering CLE was wondering if they were going to trade Garland after he cratered & thought Mobley would never meet his potential.

This myth that "They just finally blossomed on their own " is insane. The coach changing their entire system had nothing to do with that? :rofl2:


To be fair, Garland and Mobley were both top 5 picks and either would’ve became all-stars on different teams. They’re not system players. If you want to say Atkinson accelerated that process then I’ll give you that. But they would’ve eventually turned into the players they are today with any other coach.

A new coach could elevate Bridges into an All-Star but I have my doubts about that.

Return to New York Knicks