Stratmaster wrote:Infinity2152 wrote:Stratmaster wrote:
I would be pumped about the play-in if we had any good players and a head coach that knew what he was doing. But the 3 best players the team had are all gone with nothing in return other than Giddey, and Billy is still here.
You think Heat fans were pumped about the play-in?
That's a pretty pessimistic look at our current squad. Would argue Vuc and Lonzo Ball could either/both slot in as 2 of our best 3 players, and they're still here. We got Giddey for trading a bench player. We got a likely lottery first round pick back plus our future picks unlocked for Lavine, plus Collins and Huerter, that's not nothing. Collins is looking good and Huerter's picking it up. As for no good players, Matas, Coby, Smith, Ball, Vucevic are good players depending on what metric you're using. Ayo's been a good player, and could recover. We have probably one contract that could be considered bad, and that's only $18 mill. Huerter and Colins TBD.
Billy should be here. Purpose of a coach is to get the team wins, and not a lot of coaches getting many more wins out of this team with the injuries and poor defensive lineups the last few years and your best playmaker is Debo. You try starting White, Lavine, Debo and Vuc and trying to get your team to stay in games defensively, lmao! Every coach gets their decisions micromanaged by fans, wins are what counts. A team being at/near .500 with maybe the worst defensive starting lineup in the league has to be tough.
There is no universe where Lavine, Demar and Caruso weren't the 3 best players on this team. I would agree that Ball might fall in there but he hasn't been available.
Matas may evolve into a quality starter. I think he will. But he isn't now. Coby never has been. Ayo never has been although you might get away with starting him in a lineup that has 4 great players around him. Vuc is done here.
This team has underperformed expectations the entire time Billy has been here. He has mismanaged players. He has mismanaged lineups and rotations. He has mismanaged game situations. The team has never had a functioning offensive system compared to other teams coaching.
I have asked this question multiple times and never get an answer. Name one thing that has shown progress as Billy's tenure here has passed. One facet of the game. Hell, even one player who has blossomed under Billy's coaching.
Billy's solution is "we need to try harder". I guess every player on the team just is apathetic and doesn't give effort. If that is true, who is responsible for that from a high level, holistic perspective?
The Bulls have underperformed every season Billy has been at the helm.
Caruso and Vuc stats with the Bull same three seasons:
Season 1: 7pts, 4 rbs, 4 assists, 18/41 starts Vuc 17.6 pts, 11 rebounds, 3.2 assists 73/73 starts
Season 2: 5.6 pts, 2.9 rbs, 2.9 assists 36/67 starts Vuc 17.6 pts, 11 rebounds, 3.2 assists 82/82 starts
Season 3: 10pts, 3.8 rbs, 3.5 assists 57/71 starts Vuc 18 pts, 10.5 rebounds, 3.3 assists 74/76 starts
In no way, shape, form or fashion has Caruso been a better player than Vuc. Vuc is a perennial starter, Caruso is a perennial bench player. In no universe has Caruso been considered better than Vuc, or even in All-Star consideration. Caruso's at 6pts, 2.7 rbs, 2.7 assists this season. He's a 6'5 PG/SG who doesn't score, pass or rebound, just defend.
Coby has blossomed under Billy. Much better than he was. The only young player besides Pat and Ayo to get real minutes, and Ayo has performed very well at multiple times, especially for a second round draft pick. Coby: 13, 3.5 rbs, 2.7 assists rookie year to 19.1 pts, 4.5 rbs, 4.6 assists on better shooting last year. Was there some way he could give Coby longer arms, make him more consistent shooting? Or be a PG in the first place? Can't start at SG with Zach here.
Giddey looks better this year.
Matas is looking better.
Zach, Debo and Vucevic were too old to be "blossoming", but Zach and Vuc shooting career highs this season.
Pat Will is the only young player drafted in the top 10 that hasn't really developed. Likelihood of success for guys at Terry and Phillips draft position is low, anyway. And we had a team full of vets, no room to play them. Is that Billy's fault?
Bulls have arguably overperformed every year Billy has been at the helm.
Starting PG still getting paid, out for three years.
Starting PF played 17, 82, and 43 games last three years. And that guy is Pat Will. No real starting PF for 3 years.
Starting SG played 67, 77, 25 games last three years
Super valuable Caruso played 41, 67, 71
Bulls record last three years: 46, 40, 39. Are you saying these were 50+ win teams, and Billy under coached them?