What Time Frame Do You Prefer to Use When Discussing Peaks?
Moderators: penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063
What Time Frame Do You Prefer to Use When Discussing Peaks?
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,871
- And1: 2,593
- Joined: Sep 23, 2023
What Time Frame Do You Prefer to Use When Discussing Peaks?
What time frame do you prefer to use when discussing peaks? 1-Year. 3-Years? 5 Years? 7-Years? 9-Years?
Re: What Time Frame Do You Prefer to Use When Discussing Peaks?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,693
- And1: 25,012
- Joined: Aug 11, 2015
-
Re: What Time Frame Do You Prefer to Use When Discussing Peaks?
I think 2-3 years is perfect, unless you deal with injury-prone players.
Re: What Time Frame Do You Prefer to Use When Discussing Peaks?
- TheGOATRises007
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,415
- And1: 20,072
- Joined: Oct 05, 2013
-
Re: What Time Frame Do You Prefer to Use When Discussing Peaks?
2-3 years seems good.
Prime is like 5-10 years for me.
Prime is like 5-10 years for me.
Re: What Time Frame Do You Prefer to Use When Discussing Peaks?
-
- Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
- Posts: 30,164
- And1: 9,777
- Joined: Aug 14, 2004
- Location: South Florida
-
Re: What Time Frame Do You Prefer to Use When Discussing Peaks?
I think of peak as 1 year so you can get in the one year wonders; prime I tend to start at 8 years, much less than that is a "short prime" and much longer is "long prime."
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
Re: What Time Frame Do You Prefer to Use When Discussing Peaks?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,724
- And1: 5,460
- Joined: Jun 03, 2023
Re: What Time Frame Do You Prefer to Use When Discussing Peaks?
1 year. A longer or shorter period is probably driven by something.
Warspite wrote:Billups was a horrible scorer who could only score with an open corner 3 or a FT.
Re: What Time Frame Do You Prefer to Use When Discussing Peaks?
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 204
- And1: 210
- Joined: Oct 25, 2022
-
Re: What Time Frame Do You Prefer to Use When Discussing Peaks?
Consecutive Seasons Peaks, whether that's 2 years or 3 years.
1 Year Peaks is filled with fluke, unreliable production. 2017 Regular Season Isaiah Thomas looks like a better Offensive player than Kyrie ever was. 2003 Tracy Mcgrady looks like an historic level player when in reality Mcgrady who TS ADD never ranked inside the Top 60 of the league in any season outside of 2003, was just more of a slightly better version of Allen Iverson.
1 Year Peaks is filled with fluke, unreliable production. 2017 Regular Season Isaiah Thomas looks like a better Offensive player than Kyrie ever was. 2003 Tracy Mcgrady looks like an historic level player when in reality Mcgrady who TS ADD never ranked inside the Top 60 of the league in any season outside of 2003, was just more of a slightly better version of Allen Iverson.
Re: What Time Frame Do You Prefer to Use When Discussing Peaks?
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,052
- And1: 8,271
- Joined: Jun 16, 2015
-
Re: What Time Frame Do You Prefer to Use When Discussing Peaks?
1 year is the definition of peak for me.
Re: What Time Frame Do You Prefer to Use When Discussing Peaks?
-
- Senior
- Posts: 541
- And1: 221
- Joined: Jun 17, 2022
- Location: Sydney
Re: What Time Frame Do You Prefer to Use When Discussing Peaks?
It really depends on the player and seasons.
While some can have a one year peak (T-Mac, IT4), others have a 2-3 run of extremely similar stats. I think 3 years is also good for playoffs, as the sample size is smaller, it ends up being around 60 games for 3 years of deep playoff runs.
While some can have a one year peak (T-Mac, IT4), others have a 2-3 run of extremely similar stats. I think 3 years is also good for playoffs, as the sample size is smaller, it ends up being around 60 games for 3 years of deep playoff runs.
Re: What Time Frame Do You Prefer to Use When Discussing Peaks?
- Jaivl
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,029
- And1: 6,695
- Joined: Jan 28, 2014
- Location: A Coruña, Spain
- Contact:
-
Re: What Time Frame Do You Prefer to Use When Discussing Peaks?
1 season can be a flukey peak, but still a peak.
This place is a cesspool of mindless ineptitude, mental decrepitude, and intellectual lassitude. I refuse to be sucked any deeper into this whirlpool of groupthink sewage. My opinions have been expressed. I'm going to go take a shower.
Re: What Time Frame Do You Prefer to Use When Discussing Peaks?
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 12,556
- And1: 8,189
- Joined: Feb 24, 2013
-
Re: What Time Frame Do You Prefer to Use When Discussing Peaks?
Contextually [within discussions] we hear it referred to for meaning anywhere from 1 year to 3-4 years.
When we do Peaks Projects here, we are specifically referring to a player's ONE best season......and thus that is the definition that I go by. And that fits with some players who have one season that is clearly better than any other (e.g. '03 TMac, '11 Rose, '00 Shaq, '16 Draymond, '77 Walton, '76 Dr. J).
For "prime", I don't like to settle on any one number, because I think it varies wildly by player [related to health]. For me, "prime" refers to the period of time a player is playing at their customary high level; not every year a peak, but generally each year within this period is not tremendously far off their peak.
But it can be super short (e.g. like 2 years in the case of Bill Walton), or something like 13 years (in the case of someone like Karl Malone), or even longer (LeBron or Kareem??).
I would say it USUALLY falls somewhere in the neighborhood of AROUND 8 seasons.......but again, highly variable.
When we do Peaks Projects here, we are specifically referring to a player's ONE best season......and thus that is the definition that I go by. And that fits with some players who have one season that is clearly better than any other (e.g. '03 TMac, '11 Rose, '00 Shaq, '16 Draymond, '77 Walton, '76 Dr. J).
For "prime", I don't like to settle on any one number, because I think it varies wildly by player [related to health]. For me, "prime" refers to the period of time a player is playing at their customary high level; not every year a peak, but generally each year within this period is not tremendously far off their peak.
But it can be super short (e.g. like 2 years in the case of Bill Walton), or something like 13 years (in the case of someone like Karl Malone), or even longer (LeBron or Kareem??).
I would say it USUALLY falls somewhere in the neighborhood of AROUND 8 seasons.......but again, highly variable.
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
Re: What Time Frame Do You Prefer to Use When Discussing Peaks?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,257
- And1: 17,961
- Joined: May 31, 2015
Re: What Time Frame Do You Prefer to Use When Discussing Peaks?
Peak is one season.
Prime is very different for different players.
Prime is very different for different players.
All human life on the earth is like grass, and all human glory is like a flower in a field. The grass dries up and its flower falls off, but the Lord’s word endures forever.
Re: What Time Frame Do You Prefer to Use When Discussing Peaks?
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,598
- And1: 2,017
- Joined: Feb 18, 2021
-
Re: What Time Frame Do You Prefer to Use When Discussing Peaks?
Special_Puppy wrote:What time frame do you prefer to use when discussing peaks? 1-Year. 3-Years? 5 Years? 7-Years? 9-Years?
First of all, in all other sports, and perhaps other venues than Real GM Forums, we call it "prime", rather than "peak" (which is reductive in that most people consider it only 1 single year.
"Prime" is usually 5-10 years (many people choose 6-7 years), because it measures so much more, and ergo is more valid, reliable, and more accurately representative of a player at their absolute best.