Handlez wrote:A lot depends on the franchise.
The Mavs, if I'm not mistaken, had to trade away basically every starter in Luka's rookie season because they couldn't handle a European white rookie being alpha dog.
The franchise is going to have to give Coop the keys and dismiss anyone not getting in line.
Franchises can ruin careers.
No great player has their career ruined by this, it's not a thing. Now you might delay the inevitable a little bit, but there's no means of ruining these types of players careers because they are sharing playmaking/ball handling. I'm actually curious as to what makes people think this as there are no actual examples of this and tons of examples of the opposite.
Nash/KJ/Kidd, Nash wasn't ruined. Harden was behind Westbrook and Durant, not ruined. Bledsoe (just good not great) was behind CP and Blake, no ruining. SGA played behind Lou Williams, then had CP and Schroder as a sophomore. Haliburton with Fox, etc, etc, etc.
The skills don't somehow erode, they also still get reps for the primary role, they just aren't always fully maximized early.
Duke4life831 wrote:tmorgan wrote:Duke4life831 wrote:Whoever drafts him, they best not have a high Usage player. If they do, they better trade away that high usage guy.
If you draft Flagg, you toss him in the point forward role from day 1. Having him play off of a high usage guard will just be wasting valuable time he can have in that role, which will be his role in the league.
Him next to Ball would be a horrible start to his career.
I think that highly depends on the high usage player you’re talking about.
My Pistons have such a player, but one that’s willing to do whatever it takes to win. If you believe Cade, and I have no reason not to, if the opposing team wants to keep the ball out of his hands and will overcommit to do so, he’s fine with someone else getting the shine.
Of course, we aren’t going to have a shot at Flagg, so it doesn’t really matter. And I agree LaMelo, in his current form, is the wrong kind of teammate. But I do think Cooper isn’t going to be a 20 ppg guy in the beginning, if it all, so having guys that want shots isn’t really a problem. It seems like most successful teams have multiple playmakers anyway, so as long as you aren’t talking about a Beal in Washington scenario, or LaMelo, I think there are plenty of great fits.
I think any high usage player in general will be a bad pairing if you’re trying to reach Flagg’s ceiling. Doesn’t matter if it will be a struggle his first season or two.
The Spurs aren’t going to make the playoffs in the first two years of Wemby, just like the Cavs didn’t make the playoffs the first two years with LeBron. So I don’t think immediate individual or team success really matters here.
But if I’m drafting Flagg, my hope is he is going to be THE franchise cornerstone. At least for 2 years, I’m handing him the ball and a high usage role to see how much he improves in those 2-3 years. If by then he’s not showing potential as your #1 option, okay I might start to rethink it.
Right now I don’t want to pair him with another high usage player. I’m giving him the LeBron/Luka treatment from day 1.
Luka his first year: Harrison Barnes and Tim Hardaway were the 2nd and 3rd leading scorers.
Year 2: they did bring in KP, but KP has always been a very low Time Per Possession guy. So it’s not like he was taking the ball out of Luka’s hands.
Same thing with LeBron. Hell Jeff McInnis was Cleveland’s secondary ball handler and 3rd scoring option during LeBron’s 2nd year.
I think this is the same scenario you build around Flagg early on. Allow him to take his bumps and bruises early on. Then slowly start filling out off ball players that fit around him. Then once he has a really good grasp as the definitive #1 guy, you can bring in another high usage guy to be his #2.
Cleveland got McInnis in LeBron's rookie season at the deadline in order to relieve him of too much on ball duties as a rookie, but yea, there's no need to have another ball dominant guy if that's not the fit. You can also always try it out and see if it works, then if not, you can pivot.
It's a great idea to get him his reps early and get the growing pains out of the way. That said, it's not going to make or break his development or change the level of player he becomes. It can certainly waste your time as a team in terms of roster build, etc though.