FarBeyondDriven wrote:the NBA is all about usage. There are a lot of guys languishing on NBA benches or down in the G-League that would produce if given the chance. Pritchard would put up all-star numbers if he was starting. His PER 36 have always indicated this. His defense is actually better than most point guards so it's funny how that is brought up all the time as a negative. I'd certainly take him and start him over anyone else on our roster in a heartbeat. I feel bad for him because of the contract he was forced to sign. Notice how they held back minutes/usage until he signed and now he's getting near starter minutes since. That's how you artificially keep a player's value down to screw him over. His agent failed him big time. But I guess he didn't foresee his minutes increasing and didn't want to bet on himself either. I hope to see him prove me right if/when he gets a chance to start somewhere someday.
Depends on what you mean by "produce". There are a lot of guys who can put up counting stats, yes, but whether they can have positive impact of be efficient over a large sample is a different question.
RRR3 wrote:Prime JJ Redick is probably a good comp for him. People may say Redick was just a shooter but he could play point guard actually.
JJ is not a good comparison, and he would be the first to tell you that he can't "play point guard". He would say something more like, I can pass a little bit, he can be a little back up ball handler and can create from the off ball actions, but saying he can play point guard is a stretch. The difference in handles between them is pretty massive.