ESPN Newest Advanced Stat - Net Points

Moderators: bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, ken6199, Domejandro

Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 53,028
And1: 22,002
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: ESPN Newest Advanced Stat - Net Points 

Post#21 » by Doctor MJ » Thu Mar 6, 2025 9:25 pm

runtmc wrote:
slick_watts wrote:dean oliver is an analytics legend but imo a bit of a dinosaur.

Dean is certainly a legend, one of the early members of the basketball stats community. Aside from Basketball on Paper, he started the APBR message board on the old sonicscentral forum and was an early influential member, along with Dan Rosenbaum, Kevin Pelton, Roland Beech, and to a lesser extent Hollinger (and others of course). He was the first guy from APBR to get hired as an analyst by a front office, and he also helped organize the Sloan conference. I talked stats with Dean a bunch back in the day on the APBR forum when I was still a stats undergrad and can say first hand he's genuinely a very smart guy. He studied math or physics (I dont remember) at CalTech and had a Phd in stats. Suffice to say he knows his stuff.

Back then, there were mostly two camps: the possession based stats camp was lead by Oliver, and +/- based stats was Rosenbaum's camp -- it seems like this is more work along the same vein. He hasnt done much publicly in basketball stats in years, but I dont think its fair to say hes a dinosaur -- its just most of the work he's done has been behind closed doors. He's been in the industry/front offices for a couple decades now, and Im quite sure he's still involved with a lot of the latest stuff going on in analytics.

As far as this metric, its hard to say anything about it, given there isnt anything about the methodology I can find. But given its Oliver's work, it seems like it should be useful, its just hard to know how useful/in what contexts without more information.


Interesting your description of the 2 camps. When I first joined RealGM I also soon joined APBRmetrics kind of expecting I'd get more into that community than this one, but while I had a lot of respect for Oliver and the the other big names there, it felt like most of the actual community there really was just doing Tendex/PER-type stuff and that they were actually hostile to the use of +/-. Yes Rosenbaum was a sometimes poster and he was involved with +/- and respected, but among the rank & file, it seemed like a group that was fighting the previous war.

Gradually as PM led to APM & RAPM, and the guys doing that stuff got hired by NBA teams, APBRmetrics became a major place for +/- style stats, but by that point I was busy doing other career stuff and RealGM was the place that felt like home.

In terms of the possession-based stats camp, it's interesting because I didn't perceive that as a separate camp. Oliver was the main guy associated with it without question, but I felt like he was universally appreciated for that work by both the Tendexers and PMers.

Does my recollection fit with yours and do you feel like I had something backwards?
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
User avatar
Jamaaliver
Forum Mod - Hawks
Forum Mod - Hawks
Posts: 45,015
And1: 17,107
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Location: Officially a citizen of the World...
Contact:
     

Re: ESPN Newest Advanced Stat - Net Points 

Post#22 » by Jamaaliver » Thu Mar 6, 2025 10:13 pm

Sengun's defense seems waaaaay too high.

JJJ's defense seems waaaaay too low.

Image
User avatar
CoP
General Manager
Posts: 8,415
And1: 11,285
Joined: May 04, 2017
 

Re: ESPN Newest Advanced Stat - Net Points 

Post#23 » by CoP » Thu Mar 6, 2025 10:58 pm

Jamaaliver wrote:Sengun's defense seems waaaaay too high.

JJJ's defense seems waaaaay too low.

Image

It has Sengun with the highest number of net points on defense.

Like others have said, they're not showing their methodology. In that respect, it reminds me of NFL QBR, which ESPN came out several years ago and similarly did not show their methodology. It's a proprietary statistic and so they don't want to show the formulas.
HotelVitale
RealGM
Posts: 16,709
And1: 11,818
Joined: Sep 14, 2007
Location: West Philly, PA

Re: ESPN Newest Advanced Stat - Net Points 

Post#24 » by HotelVitale » Thu Mar 6, 2025 11:01 pm

CoP wrote:
Jamaaliver wrote:Sengun's defense seems waaaaay too high.

JJJ's defense seems waaaaay too low.

Image

It has Sengun with the highest number of net points on defense.

Like others have said, they're not showing their methodology. In that respect, it reminds me of NFL QBR, which ESPN came out several years ago and similarly did not show their methodology. It's a proprietary statistic and so they don't want to show the formulas.


Funny, that’s like having a propriety new dish that you don’t let anyone taste. The method is how we know if this thing is any good, useless without that.
User avatar
FrodoBaggins
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,841
And1: 2,898
Joined: Dec 25, 2013

Re: ESPN Newest Advanced Stat - Net Points 

Post#25 » by FrodoBaggins » Fri Mar 7, 2025 2:03 am

Dean Oliver is the godfather of analytics. I think Net Points has the most value at the team level.
runtmc
Sophomore
Posts: 219
And1: 338
Joined: Dec 31, 2018

Re: ESPN Newest Advanced Stat - Net Points 

Post#26 » by runtmc » Fri Mar 7, 2025 4:31 am

Doctor MJ wrote:
runtmc wrote:
slick_watts wrote:dean oliver is an analytics legend but imo a bit of a dinosaur.

Dean is certainly a legend, one of the early members of the basketball stats community. Aside from Basketball on Paper, he started the APBR message board on the old sonicscentral forum and was an early influential member, along with Dan Rosenbaum, Kevin Pelton, Roland Beech, and to a lesser extent Hollinger (and others of course). He was the first guy from APBR to get hired as an analyst by a front office, and he also helped organize the Sloan conference. I talked stats with Dean a bunch back in the day on the APBR forum when I was still a stats undergrad and can say first hand he's genuinely a very smart guy. He studied math or physics (I dont remember) at CalTech and had a Phd in stats. Suffice to say he knows his stuff.

Back then, there were mostly two camps: the possession based stats camp was lead by Oliver, and +/- based stats was Rosenbaum's camp -- it seems like this is more work along the same vein. He hasnt done much publicly in basketball stats in years, but I dont think its fair to say hes a dinosaur -- its just most of the work he's done has been behind closed doors. He's been in the industry/front offices for a couple decades now, and Im quite sure he's still involved with a lot of the latest stuff going on in analytics.

As far as this metric, its hard to say anything about it, given there isnt anything about the methodology I can find. But given its Oliver's work, it seems like it should be useful, its just hard to know how useful/in what contexts without more information.


Interesting your description of the 2 camps. When I first joined RealGM I also soon joined APBRmetrics kind of expecting I'd get more into that community than this one, but while I had a lot of respect for Oliver and the the other big names there, it felt like most of the actual community there really was just doing Tendex/PER-type stuff and that they were actually hostile to the use of +/-. Yes Rosenbaum was a sometimes poster and he was involved with +/- and respected, but among the rank & file, it seemed like a group that was fighting the previous war.

Gradually as PM led to APM & RAPM, and the guys doing that stuff got hired by NBA teams, APBRmetrics became a major place for +/- style stats, but by that point I was busy doing other career stuff and RealGM was the place that felt like home.

In terms of the possession-based stats camp, it's interesting because I didn't perceive that as a separate camp. Oliver was the main guy associated with it without question, but I felt like he was universally appreciated for that work by both the Tendexers and PMers.

Does my recollection fit with yours and do you feel like I had something backwards?


Ah cool, there's a few of us still kicking around it seems. :lol:

Funny how our experiences color our perception/perspective of things. At the time, I was a stats undergrad and was interested in/doing work on possession based stuff in my free time, so that might be the source of my perspective on there being two camps -- Oliver was someone that I went to for feedback on the stuff I was doing, along with a few other posters (wizardskev/Kevin Pelton was another one), while Rosenbaum and the rest seemed more interested in pursuing his work on RAPM at the time (he had just come out with his RAPM stuff a few months after I joined, and a lot of people jumped on the bandwagon). At least at the time, I dont remember much work on Tendex/PER type stuff -- I remember there was a bit of talk when the wages on wins stuff came out, but that was more towards the end of when I was there, and some people did some work on stuff around that. I just dont remember much work being done with weighted metrics. Or maybe I just didnt pay much attention to it -- I didnt think much of it at the time. Also I think it sounds like you might've come along a little bit after I did? I thought it was ~2002/2003ish when I joined, but Basketball on Paper didnt come out until 2002 and Berri's stuff didnt get published until 06 apparently (although I vaguely recall he posted the wages on wins stuff to the board before he later published, so Im not sure). It must've been more like 04-06? when I was active, but the timeline of things is a bit hazy honestly, its been awhile.

One of the things I got involved with was the project for charting play by play data for Roland from 82games, but something that bothered me was they were going to keep the data private. If you didnt participate in charting, you werent going to have access to the data, and that rubbed me the wrong way -- I felt like we should be making the data public. There was a lot of trading of spreadsheets of raw data behind the scenes/in DMs -- wizardskev actually shared a bunch of data with me, or I wouldnt have had access to much of it at the time. There was a site -- I think it was bball index -- who later posted a bunch of the raw play by play data, and I did a project at school using some of that data. Anyway, between all the politics about data, Oliver leaving for a front office job (Pelton later did too), and me getting busier with finishing school, I drifted away from APBR after a couple years and started mostly just lurking occasionally. I also got contacted quite a few times in private from people who wanted me to convert some of the work I had done into prediction stuff for sports gambling -- I probably got at least a half dozen different inquiries -- and that also had turned me off. I stayed in contact with a few guys via email for a couple years, but slowly lost contact with everyone.

Do you remember what time period you were on there/did you post much? APBR was such a small community at the time (there were probably less than 50-100 regular posters, although Im sure there were a lot of lurkers) I didnt realize there was that much crossover between there/RealGM, so thats nice to see.
kcktiny
Pro Prospect
Posts: 849
And1: 626
Joined: Aug 14, 2012

Re: ESPN Newest Advanced Stat - Net Points 

Post#27 » by kcktiny » Fri Mar 7, 2025 4:44 am

Dean is certainly a legend, one of the early members of the basketball stats community. Aside from Basketball on Paper, he started the APBR message board on the old sonicscentral forum and was an early influential member, along with Dan Rosenbaum, Kevin Pelton, Roland Beech, and to a lesser extent Hollinger (and others of course). He was the first guy from APBR to get hired as an analyst by a front office


Wasn't Hollinger a GM at some point?

Gradually as PM led to APM & RAPM, and the guys doing that stuff got hired by NBA teams


Any of these ABPR guys still working for NBA teams?
User avatar
LarsV8
RealGM
Posts: 10,118
And1: 5,398
Joined: Dec 13, 2009
       

Re: ESPN Newest Advanced Stat - Net Points 

Post#28 » by LarsV8 » Fri Mar 7, 2025 4:55 am

Yea, you can toss this one in the trash.

The Rockets literally hide Sengun on the worst offensive player the other team has (or non shooter), and they constantly try to get a switch, so Sengun can get targeted. At the same time, Sengun hugs the non shooter so he doesn't get put into the position to have to close out. Its a whole subplot within every game.

I am sure Sengun does "save" alot of points, by always being on the other teams scrubbiest player, as that guy is never going to get the ball.

I love Sengun, but he is hilariously bad on defense.
Image
runtmc
Sophomore
Posts: 219
And1: 338
Joined: Dec 31, 2018

Re: ESPN Newest Advanced Stat - Net Points 

Post#29 » by runtmc » Fri Mar 7, 2025 5:11 am

kcktiny wrote:
Dean is certainly a legend, one of the early members of the basketball stats community. Aside from Basketball on Paper, he started the APBR message board on the old sonicscentral forum and was an early influential member, along with Dan Rosenbaum, Kevin Pelton, Roland Beech, and to a lesser extent Hollinger (and others of course). He was the first guy from APBR to get hired as an analyst by a front office


Wasn't Hollinger a GM at some point?

Gradually as PM led to APM & RAPM, and the guys doing that stuff got hired by NBA teams


Any of these ABPR guys still working for NBA teams?


Not that I can remember -- Hollinger had been working for ESPN for awhile, and he did post on APBR occasionally, but he was more of a professor emeritus type figure on the board that people looked up to more due to his fame (he was basically the only publicly known basketball stats guy at the time, so it kinda felt like he had "made it"/broken through, or at least it seemed that way to me) -- his stats work on the other hand didnt have the best reputation, but I do vaguely recall him later on getting a front office job of some kind. Pretty sure he was never a GM though?

Rosenbaum was definitely hired by a front office at some point (I want to say Chicago for some reason, but I might be misremembering), and might still be in a front office somewhere? Dunno. Oliver definitely was 100% in several different front offices, but seems like he isnt anymore? Pelton also was in a front office at some point for awhile -- I think it was Memphis originally that hired him if I remember right -- but I think he works for ESPN/writes articles now? Roland Beech ran the old analytics site 82games, but I dont think he ever got a front office job as far as I can recall.

There were definitely some others that got front office jobs, but some of their names/handles escape me right now -- a good half dozen or more guys ended up in front offices that I personally remember, probably there were more though. There were definitely a lot of guys that got hired based on their connections in APBR. I do remember Dallas hired someone, I just dont remember who. I have no doubt at least some of them are still in front offices though. Oh, and Morey actually used to be an APBR guy (though he didnt post as much as others), so thats one thats still in a front office/GM. Im sure there must be others though.
AussieCeltic
RealGM
Posts: 13,016
And1: 24,232
Joined: Jan 02, 2014
 

Re: ESPN Newest Advanced Stat - Net Points 

Post#30 » by AussieCeltic » Fri Mar 7, 2025 5:35 am

DLoMor wrote:Useless stat because Tatum isn’t the 3rd best player in the NBA.


Do you just go into every thread and say the same thing? We get it, you don’t like Tatum.

Must suck that he keeps winning
LaLover11 wrote:I bet you $100 Mavs beat the Celtics
JonFromVA
RealGM
Posts: 15,066
And1: 5,004
Joined: Dec 08, 2009
     

Re: ESPN Newest Advanced Stat - Net Points 

Post#31 » by JonFromVA » Fri Mar 7, 2025 5:46 am

I respect Dean Oliver, but not ESPN. Of course it's a proprietary stat with barely anything useful said about how it works, and if they decide they don't like how the numbers turn out, they'll just put someone else in charge of the stat and tweak it how they want it to turn out because they're ESPN.
Fencer reregistered
RealGM
Posts: 40,988
And1: 27,858
Joined: Oct 25, 2006

Re: ESPN Newest Advanced Stat - Net Points 

Post#32 » by Fencer reregistered » Fri Mar 7, 2025 6:03 am

runtmc wrote:
kcktiny wrote:
Dean is certainly a legend, one of the early members of the basketball stats community. Aside from Basketball on Paper, he started the APBR message board on the old sonicscentral forum and was an early influential member, along with Dan Rosenbaum, Kevin Pelton, Roland Beech, and to a lesser extent Hollinger (and others of course). He was the first guy from APBR to get hired as an analyst by a front office


Wasn't Hollinger a GM at some point?

Gradually as PM led to APM & RAPM, and the guys doing that stuff got hired by NBA teams


Any of these ABPR guys still working for NBA teams?


Not that I can remember -- Hollinger had been working for ESPN for awhile, and he did post on APBR occasionally, but he was more of a professor emeritus type figure on the board that people looked up to more due to his fame (he was basically the only publicly known basketball stats guy at the time, so it kinda felt like he had "made it"/broken through, or at least it seemed that way to me) -- his stats work on the other hand didnt have the best reputation, but I do vaguely recall him later on getting a front office job of some kind. Pretty sure he was never a GM though?

Rosenbaum was definitely hired by a front office at some point (I want to say Chicago for some reason, but I might be misremembering), and might still be in a front office somewhere? Dunno. Oliver definitely was 100% in several different front offices, but seems like he isnt anymore? Pelton also was in a front office at some point for awhile -- I think it was Memphis originally that hired him if I remember right -- but I think he works for ESPN/writes articles now? Roland Beech ran the old analytics site 82games, but I dont think he ever got a front office job as far as I can recall.

There were definitely some others that got front office jobs, but some of their names/handles escape me right now -- a good half dozen or more guys ended up in front offices that I personally remember, probably there were more though. There were definitely a lot of guys that got hired based on their connections in APBR. I do remember Dallas hired someone, I just dont remember who. I have no doubt at least some of them are still in front offices though. Oh, and Morey actually used to be an APBR guy (though he didnt post as much as others), so thats one thats still in a front office/GM. Im sure there must be others though.


I'm pretty sure Hollinger had a big-sounding job with the Grizzlies.
Banned temporarily for, among other sins, being "Extremely Deviant".
slick_watts
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,533
And1: 6,780
Joined: Jan 03, 2005
Location: Miami, FL

Re: ESPN Newest Advanced Stat - Net Points 

Post#33 » by slick_watts » Fri Mar 7, 2025 4:34 pm

JonFromVA wrote:I respect Dean Oliver, but not ESPN. Of course it's a proprietary stat with barely anything useful said about how it works, and if they decide they don't like how the numbers turn out, they'll just put someone else in charge of the stat and tweak it how they want it to turn out because they're ESPN.


just like they did with real plus-minus.

Return to The General Board