Ainosterhaspie wrote:michaelm wrote:Ainosterhaspie wrote:Jordan got those guys year 4. By year 7 they had won a title. LeBron stayed in Cleveland 7 years, so yes, LeBron would have stayed.
The thread has devolved down into fundamentally meaningless arguments about hypotheticals, started by a Jordan partisan in this case.
If I want to play though you can’t know whether Chicago could/would have built around young LeBron as they did around Jordan, whether Pippen would have become the player he did next to LeBron, whether LeBron would have acceded to the triangle offense etc. LeBron also lost elsewhere the 8th year with a strong team. On the other hand people say Jordan was close to looking elsewhere.
Some of my personal caveats on LeBron are currently being answered though. Reaves did develop next to him at the Lakers where he has stayed long enough for this to occur, and he is playing a less heliocentric game plan next to a player of Luka’s quality. Current moderately healthy Luka is however probably better than anyone Jordan played with including Pippen.
I'm not trying to make a hypothetical point here, rather responding to one that seems to mix up some basic facts. LeBron stayed in Cleveland seven years. He didn't just leave right out the gate. In the same amount of time Chicago found and developed some elite role players. In the same amount of time Cleveland completely failed to do so and did not appear to have any path forward.
The post I was responding to makes an unwarranted implication that the problem is that James didn't hang around long enough. If he was only more steadfast like Jordan, it would have turned out better in Cleveland.
The difference in the two situations is that Chicago built a championship caliber supporting cast in seven years and Cleveland wasn't even close to doing so.
Sure, fair enough he would likely have stayed.
The hypotheticals were mainly the other questions or parts thereof.