Image ImageImage Image

Josh Giddey - Conundrum Killer

Moderators: HomoSapien, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10

User avatar
dougthonus
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 58,867
And1: 18,948
Joined: Dec 22, 2004
Contact:
 

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1261 » by dougthonus » Sat Mar 8, 2025 5:57 pm

DrModesty wrote:If you as an individual fan don't want to pay him (much) above the MLE, that is fine. You are living in lala land if you think an NBA franchise bereft of talent is going to behave that way. It makes you seem out of touch on what NBA salaries are in todays game.


Fundamentally, I wouldn't care what Giddey is "worth", the team that pays him what he is "worth" is almost certainly going to be a below .500 team, because his role on a contending team is bench guard.

Contending teams don't have inefficient, bottom quartile defenders as their primary ball handlers, nor do they have non shooting bottom quartile defenders as their role players. What Giddey brings does nothing for a contending team as a starter.

He could be a valuable 2nd offensive unit guy off the bench on such a team. The best GM in basketball already made that evaluation and talked to him about it, and he said no thanks.

So sure, Giddey a a floor raiser on a bad team, might be worth whatever, I don't want to sign floor raisers on my bad team.
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 29,481
And1: 9,125
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1262 » by Chi town » Sat Mar 8, 2025 7:05 pm

dougthonus wrote:
Chi town wrote:
dougthonus wrote:
Sure, and they didn't want him, and they benched him in the playoffs.

To me, Giddey is the PG Vucevic.


Doesn’t get any lower that that, Doug.

Obviously would like to know which Vuc you are talking about and if Giddey is 22yr old Giddey or who you think he will become.


Fundamentally, ball dominant, low efficiency, non gravity creating, poor defenders are guys I would never sign on my team. I don't think they ever do anything meaningful for you whatsoever, and any money you pay them is a waste.

Giddey is such a player, so is Vuc (in almost any year of his career).

People always think that if you just get the right talent around them or the right whatever that it will work, but it doesn't and it won't, but the problem is always that the shots are always better off going to someone whom isn't low efficiency or does create gravity, so the volume is actually a negative not a positive, and the defense always kills you on the other end.

As the NBA has become way more analytically stratified, this is even more true than ever before. Every year you look at the trade deadline and every team is looking only for defense and shooting to complement their star players.

For Giddey to have 25M in value to me, he needs to become an efficient scorer either by shooting the three really well and in higher volume or by getting enough physicality to considerably increase his foul draw rate.



I’ve said 5 3s per game at 40% and 6 FTs per game at 80% would make that possible and give him some gravity. Not elite 1st option but helpful gravity.

This is what Giddey has done since the TDL.

If Giddey continues this the rest of the way I’d match an offer up to 25M. I believe in his upward trajectory and him reaching his ceiling. I think his shooting will jump even more after a summer with Patton.
User avatar
dougthonus
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 58,867
And1: 18,948
Joined: Dec 22, 2004
Contact:
 

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1263 » by dougthonus » Sat Mar 8, 2025 7:25 pm

Chi town wrote:I’ve said 5 3s per game at 40% and 6 FTs per game at 80% would make that possible and give him some gravity. Not elite 1st option but helpful gravity.

This is what Giddey has done since the TDL.

If Giddey continues this the rest of the way I’d match an offer up to 25M. I believe in his upward trajectory and him reaching his ceiling. I think his shooting will jump even more after a summer with Patton.


If he could do that consistently, I'd be okay with that too.
Infinity2152
Veteran
Posts: 2,646
And1: 956
Joined: Jul 19, 2023
       

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1264 » by Infinity2152 » Sat Mar 8, 2025 9:12 pm

5 3's a game at 40%, wouldn't that make him one of the best three point shooters in the league? Plus 80%+ free throw shooting? So aside from being one of the best rebounding guards in the league and one of the best passing gueards in the league, he also has to be one of the best shooting guards to be effective?

Right between Steph Curry and Jamal Murray for players that take 5 3PA's game, lol.

https://www.statmuse.com/nba/ask?q=best+three+point+percentage+2024-2025+min+5+3pa%2Fgm
DrModesty
Rookie
Posts: 1,042
And1: 1,045
Joined: Jan 09, 2020

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1265 » by DrModesty » Sat Mar 8, 2025 11:48 pm

The thing with bad shooters is they need to perform for a lengthy period of time for defenses to change for them. I think Giddey is going to need to shoot high 30's on this medium volume for multiple years before defenses care. He is demanding attention on his drives, and I would argue that he is in the lower middle quartile of defenders at this point. If you compare him to other lead ball handlers he is probably close to average on defense.

But it all comes down to assuming that Giddey will improve somewhat as he ages. There is reason to assume this, because he has improved as a player during his time in the league. A lot of the anti Giddey sentiment seems to rely on virtually no improvement occurring.
User avatar
Jcool0
RealGM
Posts: 15,326
And1: 9,308
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
Location: Illinois
         

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1266 » by Jcool0 » Sun Mar 9, 2025 3:28 am

Is he getting 100M?
User avatar
HomoSapien
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 37,345
And1: 30,384
Joined: Aug 17, 2009
 

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1267 » by HomoSapien » Sun Mar 9, 2025 3:30 am

Conundrum cancelled?
ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.
User avatar
SHO'NUFF
Head Coach
Posts: 7,081
And1: 2,202
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Location: ★ ★ ★ ★
Contact:
 

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1268 » by SHO'NUFF » Sun Mar 9, 2025 3:31 am

Image
#BullsFansLivesMatter Image
WindyCityBorn
RealGM
Posts: 22,153
And1: 11,842
Joined: Jun 26, 2014
     

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1269 » by WindyCityBorn » Sun Mar 9, 2025 3:42 am

HomoSapien wrote:Conundrum cancelled?


Yes. This is no fluke or hot streak.
cocktailswith_2short
Head Coach
Posts: 6,949
And1: 470
Joined: May 25, 2002
     

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1270 » by cocktailswith_2short » Sun Mar 9, 2025 3:43 am

Im happy to say I was on this bandwagon from the start . There weren't that many of us .
User avatar
Jahensle
Veteran
Posts: 2,687
And1: 378
Joined: Nov 24, 2009
Location: Rio Grande Valley, TX
     

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1271 » by Jahensle » Sun Mar 9, 2025 3:45 am

I think at this point 5/150 would be a good deal for the bulls. He might get more.
sco
RealGM
Posts: 27,409
And1: 9,210
Joined: Sep 22, 2003
Location: Virtually Everywhere!

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1272 » by sco » Sun Mar 9, 2025 3:48 am

He may not be super quick or a big leaper, but Josh is tough, gritty and clutch. Hard not to root for guys like that.
:clap:
cocktailswith_2short
Head Coach
Posts: 6,949
And1: 470
Joined: May 25, 2002
     

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1273 » by cocktailswith_2short » Sun Mar 9, 2025 3:52 am

Jahensle wrote:I think at this point 5/150 would be a good deal for the bulls. He might get more.

Id guess this estimate is pretty close . His stock is definitely rising.
WindyCityBorn
RealGM
Posts: 22,153
And1: 11,842
Joined: Jun 26, 2014
     

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1274 » by WindyCityBorn » Sun Mar 9, 2025 3:53 am

sco wrote:He may not be super quick or a big leaper, but Josh is tough, gritty and clutch. Hard not to root for guys like that.


Neither is Luka or Jokic. High IQ matters.
PJSteven22
Starter
Posts: 2,197
And1: 918
Joined: Feb 04, 2022

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1275 » by PJSteven22 » Sun Mar 9, 2025 3:55 am

Jahensle wrote:I think at this point 5/150 would be a good deal for the bulls. He might get more.

Yikes
PJSteven22
Starter
Posts: 2,197
And1: 918
Joined: Feb 04, 2022

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1276 » by PJSteven22 » Sun Mar 9, 2025 3:56 am

Yay we’re gonna win 35-40 games and get demolished by the Celtics and Cavs for the foreseeable future.
User avatar
Jcool0
RealGM
Posts: 15,326
And1: 9,308
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
Location: Illinois
         

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1277 » by Jcool0 » Sun Mar 9, 2025 4:09 am

PJSteven22 wrote:Yay we’re gonna win 35-40 games and get demolished by the Celtics and Cavs for the foreseeable future.


4 years ago Cleveland won 22 games. There best player was Colin Sexton. Since then they drafted Darius Garland #5, Isaac Okoro #5 and Evan Mobley #3.
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 29,481
And1: 9,125
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1278 » by Chi town » Sun Mar 9, 2025 4:11 am

The Giddler showing what he can do with the keys
PJSteven22
Starter
Posts: 2,197
And1: 918
Joined: Feb 04, 2022

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1279 » by PJSteven22 » Sun Mar 9, 2025 4:22 am

Jcool0 wrote:
PJSteven22 wrote:Yay we’re gonna win 35-40 games and get demolished by the Celtics and Cavs for the foreseeable future.


4 years ago Cleveland won 22 games. There best player was Colin Sexton. Since then they drafted Darius Garland #5, Isaac Okoro #5 and Evan Mobley #3.

They actually tanked. You missed the point again. The issue with Giddey is that he’s too good to let you pick top 5 but he not good enough to lead you anywhere past the first round. We’re essentially a treadmill team.
WindyCityBorn
RealGM
Posts: 22,153
And1: 11,842
Joined: Jun 26, 2014
     

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1280 » by WindyCityBorn » Sun Mar 9, 2025 4:29 am

PJSteven22 wrote:
Jahensle wrote:I think at this point 5/150 would be a good deal for the bulls. He might get more.

Yikes


He has earned every penny.

Return to Chicago Bulls