ImageImage

Packers News, Transactions, Trade Talk - Watson 1 Year Extension Through 2026

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis, humanrefutation

stillgotgame
Analyst
Posts: 3,516
And1: 2,303
Joined: May 27, 2005
     

Re: Packers News, Transactions, Trade Talk 

Post#21 » by stillgotgame » Sun Mar 9, 2025 7:19 pm

MVP2110 wrote:If the Packers can't swing a trade for DK then I think the best fit for a WR on the Free Agent market is probably Darius Slayton. I think there is some untapped potential there given the QB situation he's dealt with in his career.


I like him. Always thought he’s been underrated. Can go deep too.
Bucks in 6
TheProdigy
Starter
Posts: 2,428
And1: 1,119
Joined: Feb 21, 2001

Re: Packers News, Transactions, Trade Talk 

Post#22 » by TheProdigy » Sun Mar 9, 2025 8:15 pm

stillgotgame wrote:
MVP2110 wrote:If the Packers can't swing a trade for DK then I think the best fit for a WR on the Free Agent market is probably Darius Slayton. I think there is some untapped potential there given the QB situation he's dealt with in his career.


I like him. Always thought he’s been underrated. Can go deep too.

I like DK too but I think the combination of a 2nd rd pick and $30 million contract is too much. If the Seahawks are willing to take Doubs/Wicks and a 3rd, I’d do it.
MVP2110
General Manager
Posts: 8,597
And1: 4,458
Joined: Jun 28, 2012
Location: Appleton WI
       

Re: Packers News, Transactions, Trade Talk 

Post#23 » by MVP2110 » Sun Mar 9, 2025 8:22 pm

Could be a DL option

Read on Twitter
?t=8WnnUymfubdcN49VWJn6-Q&s=19
Coach Drew: "Milwaukee has always been a team that I have been intrigued by. When we played them, they were a tough team for us to play. Although we did beat them all four times"
jakecronus8
RealGM
Posts: 16,735
And1: 8,144
Joined: Feb 06, 2006
     

Re: Packers News, Transactions, Trade Talk 

Post#24 » by jakecronus8 » Sun Mar 9, 2025 8:25 pm

Of all the vet options at receiver I have davante dead last unless it’s with a MASSIVE discount and the pettiness in me would need a Happy Gilmore to Chubbs style apology.
Do it for Chuck
User avatar
humanrefutation
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 32,962
And1: 16,636
Joined: Jun 05, 2006
       

Re: Packers News, Transactions, Trade Talk 

Post#25 » by humanrefutation » Mon Mar 10, 2025 12:07 am

No Davante, DK, Crosby, or Garrett. Maybe we can persuade the Bengals to send us Higgins.
MVP2110
General Manager
Posts: 8,597
And1: 4,458
Joined: Jun 28, 2012
Location: Appleton WI
       

Re: Packers News, Transactions, Trade Talk 

Post#26 » by MVP2110 » Mon Mar 10, 2025 12:10 am

The problem for the Packers is there just aren't many deep threats available. Slayton & MVS might be the only guys in Free Agency left that can fill that role.
Coach Drew: "Milwaukee has always been a team that I have been intrigued by. When we played them, they were a tough team for us to play. Although we did beat them all four times"
User avatar
Matches Malone
RealGM
Posts: 36,478
And1: 26,698
Joined: Nov 23, 2005
     

Re: Packers News, Transactions, Trade Talk 

Post#27 » by Matches Malone » Mon Mar 10, 2025 12:27 am

MVP2110 wrote:The problem for the Packers is there just aren't many deep threats available. Slayton & MVS might be the only guys in Free Agency left that can fill that role.


Read on Twitter


Saw this floating around Twitter and love the idea. Liked him during the draft and he'd be an awesome deep threat option. Colts have Pittman, Downs and Mitchell so maybe we could talk them into moving a guy for a pick or something.
Gery Woelfel wrote:Got a time big boy?
MVP2110
General Manager
Posts: 8,597
And1: 4,458
Joined: Jun 28, 2012
Location: Appleton WI
       

Re: Packers News, Transactions, Trade Talk 

Post#28 » by MVP2110 » Mon Mar 10, 2025 12:36 am

Matches Malone wrote:
MVP2110 wrote:The problem for the Packers is there just aren't many deep threats available. Slayton & MVS might be the only guys in Free Agency left that can fill that role.


Read on Twitter


Saw this floating around Twitter and love the idea. Liked him during the draft and he'd be an awesome deep threat option. Colts have Pittman, Downs and Mitchell so maybe we could talk them into moving a guy for a pick or something.


Alec Pierce would be a great addition. I have no idea what it would cost in terms of a return but in a vacuum I'd love to have him
Coach Drew: "Milwaukee has always been a team that I have been intrigued by. When we played them, they were a tough team for us to play. Although we did beat them all four times"
User avatar
Matches Malone
RealGM
Posts: 36,478
And1: 26,698
Joined: Nov 23, 2005
     

Re: Packers News, Transactions, Trade Talk 

Post#29 » by Matches Malone » Mon Mar 10, 2025 12:36 am

Read on Twitter
Gery Woelfel wrote:Got a time big boy?
MVP2110
General Manager
Posts: 8,597
And1: 4,458
Joined: Jun 28, 2012
Location: Appleton WI
       

Re: Packers News, Transactions, Trade Talk 

Post#30 » by MVP2110 » Mon Mar 10, 2025 1:25 am

Looking into WRs who could potentially fill the Deep threat role that Watson provided last year

Darius Slayton
Dyami Brown
Joshua Palmer
MVS

That's probably the list. None are super exciting but they shouldn't be expensive either. They aren't great but would fit what the Packers need for atleast a season
Coach Drew: "Milwaukee has always been a team that I have been intrigued by. When we played them, they were a tough team for us to play. Although we did beat them all four times"
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 108,084
And1: 42,327
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: Packers News, Transactions, Trade Talk 

Post#31 » by ReasonablySober » Mon Mar 10, 2025 1:33 am

The Packers don't need crappy one dimensional WRs who only run fast, they need guys who can reliably catch the ball. At this point the draft is the best option, barring a surprise trade. They made the mistake of passing on McConkey last season. Maybe they've learned and take Restrepo this year.
MVP2110
General Manager
Posts: 8,597
And1: 4,458
Joined: Jun 28, 2012
Location: Appleton WI
       

Re: Packers News, Transactions, Trade Talk 

Post#32 » by MVP2110 » Mon Mar 10, 2025 1:53 am

ReasonablySober wrote:The Packers don't need crappy one dimensional WRs who only run fast, they need guys who can reliably catch the ball. At this point the draft is the best option, barring a surprise trade. They made the mistake of passing on McConkey last season. Maybe they've learned and take Restrepo this year.


I mean the numbers would disagree with this take. The Packers have consistently scored more when they have one of MVS or Watson playing under MLF.
Last year with Watson they scored over 27 points per game, without him it was less than 20. In the 3 years they've had Watson they've scored about 2.5 more points per game with Watson then without him. They also consistently scored less when MVS wouldn't play before Watson. Having a deep threat is crucial to an offense and even if they don't put up huge numbers themselves, it opens up the field for other guys. If you don't have a deep threat then the defense can condense the field down and make life a lot harder for the other guys.
Coach Drew: "Milwaukee has always been a team that I have been intrigued by. When we played them, they were a tough team for us to play. Although we did beat them all four times"
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 103,643
And1: 55,928
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: Packers News, Transactions, Trade Talk 

Post#33 » by MickeyDavis » Mon Mar 10, 2025 2:52 am

We'll be spending some money this week. It's going to be very interesting to see the direction Gute goes. Obviously money talks and it's better to pass than overpay. A lot of teams have cap space.
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
User avatar
Frank Nova
Head Coach
Posts: 7,367
And1: 3,552
Joined: Jul 04, 2008
Location: Shootin’ dice with Larry Bird in Barcelona
       

Re: Packers News, Transactions, Trade Talk 

Post#34 » by Frank Nova » Mon Mar 10, 2025 3:16 am

MVP2110 wrote:Looking into WRs who could potentially fill the Deep threat role that Watson provided last year

Darius Slayton
Dyami Brown
Joshua Palmer
MVS

That's probably the list. None are super exciting but they shouldn't be expensive either. They aren't great but would fit what the Packers need for atleast a season


I wouldn’t mind a flier on Dyami Brown. Doesn’t turn 26 until November, has 4.4 speed and kind of showed out in the playoffs last year. Like you said, not super exciting but as a deep threat in the Packers offense I could see him settling in nicely to that role.
RIP Kobe Forever. GOAT 8-24. Long Live Giannis
PintSizedBox10
Head Coach
Posts: 7,215
And1: 3,671
Joined: Mar 31, 2019
   

Re: Packers News, Transactions, Trade Talk 

Post#35 » by PintSizedBox10 » Mon Mar 10, 2025 3:23 am

MVP2110 wrote:
ReasonablySober wrote:The Packers don't need crappy one dimensional WRs who only run fast, they need guys who can reliably catch the ball. At this point the draft is the best option, barring a surprise trade. They made the mistake of passing on McConkey last season. Maybe they've learned and take Restrepo this year.


I mean the numbers would disagree with this take. The Packers have consistently scored more when they have one of MVS or Watson playing under MLF.
Last year with Watson they scored over 27 points per game, without him it was less than 20. In the 3 years they've had Watson they've scored about 2.5 more points per game with Watson then without him. They also consistently scored less when MVS wouldn't play before Watson. Having a deep threat is crucial to an offense and even if they don't put up huge numbers themselves, it opens up the field for other guys. If you don't have a deep threat then the defense can condense the field down and make life a lot harder for the other guys.


So they have massive talent issue or MLF is clueless :lol:
User avatar
livestrong4ever
General Manager
Posts: 9,123
And1: 150
Joined: Jun 23, 2005
Location: Roaring down the river.
Contact:
     

Re: Packers News, Transactions, Trade Talk 

Post#36 » by livestrong4ever » Mon Mar 10, 2025 3:27 am

Hi All. Hope everyone is doing well

I am hoping to make it up to the Packers vs Eagles game next year (Big Eagles Fan)

Is there any hope at all of finding wheelchair accessible seats in the 300 section? I know the schedule has not officially even been released yet but want to be on top of it. Don't know if they are purchasable on the third party market and how much the mark-up is going to be on them.

The only time I been up to lambeau was when I won the it from the Packers Drawing and it was an indoor club so had no worries about accessibility. [[also got to be on field before game which was amazing experience coming out of the tunnel before the game]] [[To bad the packers lost it was the TNF two years ago when half the crowd was det lion fans]]
wallus
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,266
And1: 1,309
Joined: Jan 02, 2019
 

Re: Packers News, Transactions, Trade Talk 

Post#37 » by wallus » Mon Mar 10, 2025 3:31 am

I would like them to sign Brown (WR), Odeyingbo (DE) and Adebo (CB). I don't think paying big money for a WR is worth it.
User avatar
Turk Nowitzki
RealGM
Posts: 34,495
And1: 11,521
Joined: Feb 26, 2010
Location: on the Hellmouth
     

Re: Packers News, Transactions, Trade Talk 

Post#38 » by Turk Nowitzki » Mon Mar 10, 2025 4:19 am

wallus wrote:I would like them to sign Brown (WR), Odeyingbo (DE) and Adebo (CB). I don't think paying big money for a WR is worth it.

If Brown means Hollywood Brown he resigned with the Chiefs already.
wallus
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,266
And1: 1,309
Joined: Jan 02, 2019
 

Re: Packers News, Transactions, Trade Talk 

Post#39 » by wallus » Mon Mar 10, 2025 4:30 am

Turk Nowitzki wrote:
wallus wrote:I would like them to sign Brown (WR), Odeyingbo (DE) and Adebo (CB). I don't think paying big money for a WR is worth it.

If Brown means Hollywood Brown he resigned with the Chiefs already.


Dyami
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 103,643
And1: 55,928
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: Packers News, Transactions, Trade Talk 

Post#40 » by MickeyDavis » Mon Mar 10, 2025 4:55 am

livestrong4ever wrote:Hi All. Hope everyone is doing well

I am hoping to make it up to the Packers vs Eagles game next year (Big Eagles Fan)

Is there any hope at all of finding wheelchair accessible seats in the 300 section? I know the schedule has not officially even been released yet but want to be on top of it. Don't know if they are purchasable on the third party market and how much the mark-up is going to be on them.

The only time I been up to lambeau was when I won the it from the Packers Drawing and it was an indoor club so had no worries about accessibility. [[also got to be on field before game which was amazing experience coming out of the tunnel before the game]] [[To bad the packers lost it was the TNF two years ago when half the crowd was det lion fans]]

I would call or email the Packers ticket office 1-866-752-1265 or tickets@packers.com.

I don't know how accessible seats work as far as sales or resale. If you end up buying on the secondary market it won't be cheap. It will also likely be a primetime game.
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.

Return to Green Bay Packers