Care to elaborate?Hangtime84 wrote:Exactly I hate thibs for this
Should the players play 30 or less minutes per game?
Sent from my SM-S928U1 using RealGM mobile app
Moderators: Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
Care to elaborate?Hangtime84 wrote:Exactly I hate thibs for this
Shamet has played 27.4 MPG in this league... You truly believe 11.8 MPG is all he can muster?Wingy wrote:Roger Murdock wrote:Wingy wrote:Knicks bench isn’t exactly loaded. I’m sure he could chop some minutes during blowouts either direction, but for the most part, this seems like what they likely need to do to win at a high clip.
This is what the JB Bickerstaff truthers said about the Cavs bench last year. But with a new coach who won’t yank around minutes or bench guys for missing 1-2 threes, all of a sudden Wade, Okoro, Merill, Niang, and Levert were able to play at a considerably higher level this season. Jerome being healthy obviously helped a ton, but we had 4 productive bench players that weren’t properly utilized last season with a budget Thibs type coach
Shrug. I had seen 4 of those 5 Cavs be productive NBA players, that’s not surprising. Knicks have what? Deuce, then you can barely count Mitchell since he just got back. What else? Precious is meh, as is Shamet.
jokeboy86 wrote:Chris Broussard said something the other day I thought was nuts but it may turn out to be true sooner than later. He said that Thibs was the guy needed to turn around the Knicks culture but he may not be the one who can take them to the promised land. He said the same thing happened with Bickerstaff in Cleveland. There are probably other examples too throughout the league's history where the first guy was the guy who helped build the foundations to change the team's fortunes but it's the 2nd guy hired afterward who can get them over the hump.
Roger Murdock wrote:Wingy wrote:Knicks bench isn’t exactly loaded. I’m sure he could chop some minutes during blowouts either direction, but for the most part, this seems like what they likely need to do to win at a high clip.
This is what the JB Bickerstaff truthers said about the Cavs bench last year. But with a new coach who won’t yank around minutes or bench guys for missing 1-2 threes, all of a sudden Wade, Okoro, Merill, Niang, and Levert were able to play at a considerably higher level this season. Jerome being healthy obviously helped a ton, but we had 4 productive bench players that weren’t properly utilized last season with a budget Thibs type coach
Handlez wrote:Olajuwon, during his back to back titles, averaged 40 minutes a game and 42.5 during the playoffs lol.
Olajuwon AVERAGED 36 MINUTES A GAME OVER AN 18 YEAR CAREER.
OMG, how dare they have to play 36 out of 48 minutes! Wilt says, today's players are soft.
I worry especially for an undersized guard like Brunson having his prime cut short because of consecutive seasons of "overuse".
this seems like what they likely need to do to win at a high clip.
Go look at Stockton and Malone's minutes while playing 82 virtually every year lol.
Thibs is a moron. Didnt learn anything from Rose and the bulls.
Players don’t really practice anymore either. Playing 35 mpg 2-3x per week shouldn’t be a big deal. This generation is ridiculous
Nba minutes today are 10x more physically taxing defensively than they were in the early 2000s. A lot less one on one iso and a lot more off the ball motion.
You guys sound ridiculous when you compare minutes from previous eras to today.
The pace is the highest it's ever been...
Also, if you go back and watch the tape, these guys didn't play hard every night during the regular season - especially against bad teams.
People pay to see the stars play, not the bench warmers. In this sense I understand why you would play the starters as much as possible.
ForeverTFC wrote:Handlez wrote:They don't make em like they used to.
Go look at Stockton and Malone's minutes while playing 82 virtually every year lol.
I know I'm likely getting trolled, but I can't resist.
But jb coached the Cavs more than just the 2023-24 season and he sucked his entire 5 seasons as head coach, when it came to rotations.jbk1234 wrote:Roger Murdock wrote:Wingy wrote:Knicks bench isn’t exactly loaded. I’m sure he could chop some minutes during blowouts either direction, but for the most part, this seems like what they likely need to do to win at a high clip.
This is what the JB Bickerstaff truthers said about the Cavs bench last year. But with a new coach who won’t yank around minutes or bench guys for missing 1-2 threes, all of a sudden Wade, Okoro, Merill, Niang, and Levert were able to play at a considerably higher level this season. Jerome being healthy obviously helped a ton, but we had 4 productive bench players that weren’t properly utilized last season with a budget Thibs type coach
I'm not a JBB truther, but we didn't have Ty Jerome for the entire year and Mobley, Mitchell, and Garland missed so many games, the starters barely played together last season. Our second units always have Mitchell/Mobley or Garland/Allen in them. When our starters miss extended periods, it impacts both units. We still don't have a legitimate backup 5 on the roster.
Even though Atkinson is running deep rotations, guys like TT or CPJ aren't getting real run. Bates is still stuck in the G League. Players like Niang got real run despite it hurting in January when Mobley went down.
Handlez wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:Handlez wrote:
So you're just making things up to fit your argument.
10 times more taxing lol.
You don't ever look in the mirror and ask yourself why you must live in a fantasy to feel at ease?
Running from block to block and defending some other big guy that won't go out more than 15 ft from the rim isn't the same as perimeter defenders today having to fight over multiple screens or closing out on shooters that may or may not put the ball on the floor.
You guys sound ridiculous when you compare minutes from previous eras to today.
Oh ya man, no doubt. I don't see players just standing around in the corner every single game and not moving; my eyes are deceiving me.
There's Reggie Miller's running everywhere out there!
10 times tougher to play in today's league!
JujitsuFlip wrote:But jb coached the Cavs more than just the 2023-24 season and he sucked his entire 5 seasons as head coach, when it came to rotations.jbk1234 wrote:Roger Murdock wrote:
This is what the JB Bickerstaff truthers said about the Cavs bench last year. But with a new coach who won’t yank around minutes or bench guys for missing 1-2 threes, all of a sudden Wade, Okoro, Merill, Niang, and Levert were able to play at a considerably higher level this season. Jerome being healthy obviously helped a ton, but we had 4 productive bench players that weren’t properly utilized last season with a budget Thibs type coach
I'm not a JBB truther, but we didn't have Ty Jerome for the entire year and Mobley, Mitchell, and Garland missed so many games, the starters barely played together last season. Our second units always have Mitchell/Mobley or Garland/Allen in them. When our starters miss extended periods, it impacts both units. We still don't have a legitimate backup 5 on the roster.
Even though Atkinson is running deep rotations, guys like TT or CPJ aren't getting real run. Bates is still stuck in the G League. Players like Niang got real run despite it hurting in January when Mobley went down.
Wasn't an obvious joke at all. Use the green font next time if you really want to allude to sarcasm rather than trying to weakly pass it off as such when called on a lack of factual basis.zeebneeb wrote:You know what, I tried. Total minutes? Thats where your going? Not MPG? On an obvious joke?SkyBill40 wrote:zeebneeb wrote:Thats the joke. He is tied with his teammate for minutes played...
Except... Bridges has more. So nah.
https://www.statmuse.com/nba/ask/nba-leaders-in-total-minutes-played
Good grief.
SweaterBae wrote:It's the perfect trade when nobody is happy.
It is factual. Right on nba.com he is listed 2nd in mpg, under his teammate.SkyBill40 wrote:Wasn't an obvious joke at all. Use the green font next time if you really want to allude to sarcasm rather than trying to weakly pass it off as such when called on a lack of factual basis.zeebneeb wrote:You know what, I tried. Total minutes? Thats where your going? Not MPG? On an obvious joke?SkyBill40 wrote:
Except... Bridges has more. So nah.
https://www.statmuse.com/nba/ask/nba-leaders-in-total-minutes-played
Good grief.
But do you. It's cool. Tis the general board after all.
Sent from my SM-F936U using RealGM mobile app
Statlanta wrote:Handlez wrote:Olajuwon, during his back to back titles, averaged 40 minutes a game and 42.5 during the playoffs lol.
Olajuwon AVERAGED 36 MINUTES A GAME OVER AN 18 YEAR CAREER.
While fasting.
Handlez wrote:They don't make em like they used to.
Go look at Stockton and Malone's minutes while playing 82 virtually every year lol.
NZB2323 wrote:Handlez wrote:They don't make em like they used to.
Go look at Stockton and Malone's minutes while playing 82 virtually every year lol.
Stockton had 2 seasons where he averaged 37.8 mpg or more, which is how much Bridges is averaging this year. For his career he averaged 31.8 mpg.
Handlez wrote:NZB2323 wrote:Handlez wrote:They don't make em like they used to.
Go look at Stockton and Malone's minutes while playing 82 virtually every year lol.
Stockton had 2 seasons where he averaged 37.8 mpg or more, which is how much Bridges is averaging this year. For his career he averaged 31.8 mpg.
Stockton averaged 34.7+ minutes 10 times in his career. He played 82 games 12 times.
And of course his career average mpg went down in his 35-40 playing years.
He was a tough SOB. Built far different than players today. Just be honest.