ImageImage

PG Pacers - Bucks Hang On

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis

Daver
Head Coach
Posts: 7,010
And1: 2,688
Joined: Feb 23, 2019
       

Re: PG Pacers - Bucks Hang On 

Post#81 » by Daver » Sun Mar 16, 2025 5:04 pm

ShootingtheJ wrote:
Daver wrote:
BigO wrote:
It probably means relying on +/- is a bad idea.




Agree but to some posters thsts all they ever bring up like it all their is.In their eyes there is no other variable to the gsme and how it plays out.Guys will constantly bring up a +/- to prove their point yet wont bring up a +/- is said player they constantly trash has a positive game only for their response to then be we should use a larger sample size whrn they dont to critisize(all the fu.. time) 1 player


You don't like it when it's critical of your favorite players, which happens often because you think shooting is the only skill in basketball.




The hell i do ypur a dame fu.. hater you throw out plus n minus like its some valuable stat yet whrn other posters throw out tbe same stat with a plus ypu blow it off by saying well its 1 game pr come up with some other BS excuse to blow off a game where dame is a +.
You do it every time fpr e ery game dames a plus yet keep hamnering it over n over a game where dame is a minus making it so much more inportant in your delusional mind that a bad +/- gsme for dame is way more important than a good +/- game for dame to fit your agenda
Daver
Head Coach
Posts: 7,010
And1: 2,688
Joined: Feb 23, 2019
       

Re: PG Pacers - Bucks Hang On 

Post#82 » by Daver » Sun Mar 16, 2025 5:13 pm

Dame was +6 vs lakers n +10 vs pacers yet only time we hear from shootingtheJ is when dame is a - like last night.You throw out this stat every chance you get to try n make whatever point your trying to make yet somehow have short term memory when dame has b2b + games n dont say a word.
Bucks dont win last night without dames scoring unless you think ajax would of scored 30 points n almost has a TD
ShootingtheJ
RealGM
Posts: 11,361
And1: 7,000
Joined: Jun 20, 2010

Re: PG Pacers - Bucks Hang On 

Post#83 » by ShootingtheJ » Sun Mar 16, 2025 6:43 pm

Daver wrote:
ShootingtheJ wrote:
Daver wrote:


Agree but to some posters thsts all they ever bring up like it all their is.In their eyes there is no other variable to the gsme and how it plays out.Guys will constantly bring up a +/- to prove their point yet wont bring up a +/- is said player they constantly trash has a positive game only for their response to then be we should use a larger sample size whrn they dont to critisize(all the fu.. time) 1 player


You don't like it when it's critical of your favorite players, which happens often because you think shooting is the only skill in basketball.




The hell i do ypur a dame fu.. hater you throw out plus n minus like its some valuable stat yet whrn other posters throw out tbe same stat with a plus ypu blow it off by saying well its 1 game pr come up with some other BS excuse to blow off a game where dame is a +.
You do it every time fpr e ery game dames a plus yet keep hamnering it over n over a game where dame is a minus making it so much more inportant in your delusional mind that a bad +/- gsme for dame is way more important than a good +/- game for dame to fit your agenda


Use season stats then. Bucks are 3.2 piints/100 better without Dame. It's a fact no matter how much you don't like it. It's not about me hating Dame, I defended Dame all last season. A year later, it's still not working. My only agenda is winning. It shouldn't be surprising that a terrible defender kills our defense, but some are still in denial. The Bucks are awesome with Giannis on the floor, so it's straight up shocking that Dame's numbers can be so terrible.
ShootingtheJ
RealGM
Posts: 11,361
And1: 7,000
Joined: Jun 20, 2010

Re: PG Pacers - Bucks Hang On 

Post#84 » by ShootingtheJ » Sun Mar 16, 2025 6:46 pm

Daver wrote:Dame was +6 vs lakers n +10 vs pacers yet only time we hear from shootingtheJ is when dame is a - like last night.You throw out this stat every chance you get to try n make whatever point your trying to make yet somehow have short term memory when dame has b2b + games n dont say a word.
Bucks dont win last night without dames scoring unless you think ajax would of scored 30 points n almost has a TD


It's funny you bring up the Lakers game, another game where the Bucks were better with him on the bench. Try harder dude.

If this trend doesn't make you wonder why it's keeps happening, over a really large sample, then your just being biased. What's your explanation that the team consistently performs poorly with him on the floor? It doesn't bother you?
User avatar
Dick Tate
Analyst
Posts: 3,285
And1: 2,811
Joined: Aug 17, 2006

Re: PG Pacers - Bucks Hang On 

Post#85 » by Dick Tate » Sun Mar 16, 2025 7:51 pm

Another PG thread wiped out by an avalanche.
ShootingtheJ
RealGM
Posts: 11,361
And1: 7,000
Joined: Jun 20, 2010

Re: PG Pacers - Bucks Hang On 

Post#86 » by ShootingtheJ » Sun Mar 16, 2025 8:21 pm

Dick Tate wrote:Another PG thread wiped out by an avalanche.


If you want to talk about a different part of the game, let's hear it. How about Sims switchability against a team that has torched our slow center? Green's increased use of the pump fake to set up drives? What you got?

Return to Milwaukee Bucks