Norm2953 wrote:If they take French PG Traore, it'll be to replace Scoot for how can they play together? 
Not suggesting this, but great analogy - If the Blazers take Jordan, how can he play with Drexler?
If Traore is the BPA, you take him. The Blazers can trade Traore or Scoot if the fit isn't there. Or let Simons expire. The team needs more than one player capable of playing point.
Butter wrote:Scoots improvement and contract timing is why I keep circling the idea of trading Sharpe.  It extends the time line to give a young player a max deal.
No team is maxing out current Scoot Henderson. He's a 13/5/3 player that can't beat out Anfernee Simons. Rooting for the guy, but if he continues to improve, Simons expires next season. Cap space problem solved.
Norm2953 wrote:Sharpe + 9/10 might yield another solid player on a good contract 
as opposed to drafting someone at 9/10 and hopes he fits with what Portland needs.
Except now you just lost your team's one pure SG. Sure, you have Simons and Thybulle. But, you have Simons and Thybulle. And you just traded a 21 year old 17.5/4.1/2.6 player for this unnamed player that somehow fits the roster, is young, and is on a good contract. 
Again, I'd love to trade for Shai Gilgeous-Alexander. But, that's not realistic. Continually repeating that the Blazers should obtain elite talent on dream contracts is cool and all, but it gets a bit annoying when nobody can pin-point target acquisitions and rationalize why the other team would agree to such a deal.
DaVoiceMaster wrote:I'm not convinced Sharpe is worth $43M and if that is the asking price for his new contract, perhaps the Blazers move him.
What team has $43M in cap space that is willing to spend it all on Shaedon Sharpe? And I say that as a Sharpe stan.
Because love can burn like a cigarette.
And leave you left with nothing.
Leave you left with nothing.