ImageImageImageImageImage

Mikal Bridges is really good (when he's allowed to be)

Moderators: HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi

User avatar
Jalen Bluntson
RealGM
Posts: 25,310
And1: 26,985
Joined: Nov 07, 2012
       

Re: Mikal Bridges is really good (when he's allowed to be) 

Post#61 » by Jalen Bluntson » Wed Mar 19, 2025 6:23 pm

ctorres wrote:
Fury wrote:
DimesandKnicks wrote:I'd rather have Donte and 5 picks


Me too but how


We would have to trade Mitch for Donte straight up

I'm lost with all this apron stuff under the CBA, so I don't know if we will be too over the cap this summer to be allowed to do a sign and trade using Precious to get Donte back


We miss our boys. Donte Grimes IQ PLEASE COME HOME! :lol:
:beer: RIP mags
ctorres
RealGM
Posts: 17,439
And1: 5,683
Joined: Jun 04, 2005

Re: Mikal Bridges is really good (when he's allowed to be) 

Post#62 » by ctorres » Wed Mar 19, 2025 6:26 pm

Jalen Bluntson wrote:
ctorres wrote:
Fury wrote:
Me too but how


We would have to trade Mitch for Donte straight up

I'm lost with all this apron stuff under the CBA, so I don't know if we will be too over the cap this summer to be allowed to do a sign and trade using Precious to get Donte back


We miss our boys. Donte Grimes IQ PLEASE COME HOME! :lol:


clearly, we didn't love RJ like the other guys, lol
User avatar
mpharris36
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 112,159
And1: 115,827
Joined: Nov 03, 2010
     

Re: Mikal Bridges is really good (when he's allowed to be) 

Post#63 » by mpharris36 » Wed Mar 19, 2025 6:32 pm

NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
ctorres wrote:Mikal is averaging 23/4/5 on 63/47/95 shooting splits over the last 5 games

He has been able to step up in the absence of Brunson




And the question is, why is the coach incapable of getting that type of production out of him when Brunson is here?


I go back to Brunson being a crutch for this coach inability to be creative. A guy goes down and no we start running more on ball sets for a player that thrives on ball more than simply just being a low usage floor spacer.

He treats Mikal like Donte when Brunson is on the floor and that is a terrible use of Mikal's skill set.

Clearly Mikal is a rhythm player that needs plays run for him...whether its screens or him coming off curls. If he goes uninvolved early he probably isn't going to space the floor the way we need him to space the floor late.

When he is in rhythm and involved early he clearly is the 3rd weapon we need on this team.

I'm hoping this time off with Brunson shows how important it is to still call plays and not let Brunson just ISO. Brunson is pretty effective in C&S as well so this idea Brunson needs to be ball to score is also not the case either.

Another factor is Mikal is not chasing through the leagues most screens anymore. That is Deuce's roll...playing the leagues most minutes while taking on the biggest defensive assignment and then also expecting them to have the legs throughout the game to make shots I'm glad Mikal called him out about the minutes.

Deuce is a very effective POA defender...that also frees up Mikal more off the ball and has more energy to be a more effective offensive player.
4-Peat! 22-25 BAF Champion Spurs:

ROSTER

Walker Kessler/Daniel Gafford/Adem Bona
Nikola Jokic/Santi Aldama/Isaiah Stewart
Aaron Nesmith/Josh Hart/Jaime Jaquez
Alex Caruso/Keon Ellis/Justin Champagnie
Steph Curry/Chris Paul/Ryan Rollins
User avatar
Jalen Bluntson
RealGM
Posts: 25,310
And1: 26,985
Joined: Nov 07, 2012
       

Re: Mikal Bridges is really good (when he's allowed to be) 

Post#64 » by Jalen Bluntson » Wed Mar 19, 2025 6:41 pm

ctorres wrote:
Jalen Bluntson wrote:
ctorres wrote:
We would have to trade Mitch for Donte straight up

I'm lost with all this apron stuff under the CBA, so I don't know if we will be too over the cap this summer to be allowed to do a sign and trade using Precious to get Donte back


We miss our boys. Donte Grimes IQ PLEASE COME HOME! :lol:


clearly, we didn't love RJ like the other guys, lol


Fuq them all. :o I like the team we have and I'm over it. Grimes or Donte at their best would really help this team but, neither of them really played well off the bench for us either. I just want to upgrade the bench and see what happens then. Looking forward and moving on.
:beer: RIP mags
ctorres
RealGM
Posts: 17,439
And1: 5,683
Joined: Jun 04, 2005

Re: Mikal Bridges is really good (when he's allowed to be) 

Post#65 » by ctorres » Wed Mar 19, 2025 6:46 pm

mpharris36 wrote: this idea Brunson needs to be ball to score is also not the case either.


he was great alongside Doncic when they made the WCF together and he averaged 22 ppg
User avatar
mpharris36
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 112,159
And1: 115,827
Joined: Nov 03, 2010
     

Re: Mikal Bridges is really good (when he's allowed to be) 

Post#66 » by mpharris36 » Wed Mar 19, 2025 6:52 pm

ctorres wrote:
mpharris36 wrote: this idea Brunson needs to be ball to score is also not the case either.


he was great alongside Doncic when they made the WCF together and he averaged 22 ppg


Brunson has a 64.6% EFG% in C&S situations this year...second on the team behind KAT who is an otherworldly 68.2%

Not a small sample size...Brunson was 66.1% EFG% in C&S situation last year as well which was tops on the team.

Then go back to his first year here (2 years ago) he was an unbelievable 71.9%!!!

Now Brunson is great in ISO as well but early in games he should play some more off the catch and Mikal more on ball that could unlock a lot for our offense.
4-Peat! 22-25 BAF Champion Spurs:

ROSTER

Walker Kessler/Daniel Gafford/Adem Bona
Nikola Jokic/Santi Aldama/Isaiah Stewart
Aaron Nesmith/Josh Hart/Jaime Jaquez
Alex Caruso/Keon Ellis/Justin Champagnie
Steph Curry/Chris Paul/Ryan Rollins
User avatar
thebuzzardman
RealGM
Posts: 81,190
And1: 94,796
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: Villanovknicks

Re: Mikal Bridges is really good (when he's allowed to be) 

Post#67 » by thebuzzardman » Wed Mar 19, 2025 6:59 pm

mpharris36 wrote:
ctorres wrote:
mpharris36 wrote: this idea Brunson needs to be ball to score is also not the case either.


he was great alongside Doncic when they made the WCF together and he averaged 22 ppg


Brunson has a 64.6% EFG% in C&S situations this year...second on the team behind KAT who is an otherworldly 68.2%

Not a small sample size...Brunson was 66.1% EFG% in C&S situation last year as well which was tops on the team.

Then go back to his first year here (2 years ago) he was an unbelievable 71.9%!!!

Now Brunson is great in ISO as well but early in games he should play some more off the catch and Mikal more on ball that could unlock a lot for our offense.

You guys get it
Image
User avatar
Jalen Bluntson
RealGM
Posts: 25,310
And1: 26,985
Joined: Nov 07, 2012
       

Re: Mikal Bridges is really good (when he's allowed to be) 

Post#68 » by Jalen Bluntson » Wed Mar 19, 2025 8:58 pm

thebuzzardman wrote:
mpharris36 wrote:
ctorres wrote:
he was great alongside Doncic when they made the WCF together and he averaged 22 ppg


Brunson has a 64.6% EFG% in C&S situations this year...second on the team behind KAT who is an otherworldly 68.2%

Not a small sample size...Brunson was 66.1% EFG% in C&S situation last year as well which was tops on the team.

Then go back to his first year here (2 years ago) he was an unbelievable 71.9%!!!

Now Brunson is great in ISO as well but early in games he should play some more off the catch and Mikal more on ball that could unlock a lot for our offense.

You guys get it


Yeah. We all get it. Brunson is a scrub and the team looks better without him. Ask around. His defense is atrocious and he is a selfish ball hog. Trade the bum.
:beer: RIP mags
spree2kawhi
RealGM
Posts: 12,532
And1: 5,696
Joined: Mar 01, 2005

Re: Mikal Bridges is really good (when he's allowed to be) 

Post#69 » by spree2kawhi » Sat Mar 29, 2025 11:47 pm

Over that 11-game stretch, Bridges is averaging 21.6 points, 3.7 rebounds, 5.0 assists and 1.0 steals per game while shooting 55 percent from the floor and 37.5 percent from three-point range.
User avatar
Fury
RealGM
Posts: 24,633
And1: 18,521
Joined: Mar 07, 2007
       

Re: Mikal Bridges is really good (when he's allowed to be) 

Post#70 » by Fury » Sun Mar 30, 2025 12:40 am

Lmao Knicks are 7-5 without Brunson this year but somehow this team is worse than last year’s team. Bridges maybe something to do with this?
Parraknick
Starter
Posts: 2,229
And1: 1,107
Joined: Oct 13, 2005
Location: Sydney

Re: Mikal Bridges is really good (when he's allowed to be) 

Post#71 » by Parraknick » Sun Mar 30, 2025 12:56 am

Anyone know roughly what we might pay him?
Image
spree2kawhi
RealGM
Posts: 12,532
And1: 5,696
Joined: Mar 01, 2005

Re: Mikal Bridges is really good (when he's allowed to be) 

Post#72 » by spree2kawhi » Sun Mar 30, 2025 1:47 pm

Fury wrote:Lmao Knicks are 7-5 without Brunson this year but somehow this team is worse than last year’s team. Bridges maybe something to do with this?

I think it’s fair to say he and OG have broken out of their slump lately and we’ve won 3 out of the last 4.
User avatar
RHODEY
RealGM
Posts: 25,047
And1: 22,609
Joined: May 18, 2007
Location: Straight out of a comic book

Re: Mikal Bridges is really good (when he's allowed to be) 

Post#73 » by RHODEY » Sun Mar 30, 2025 2:21 pm

DimesandKnicks wrote:I'd rather have Donte and 5 picks

Then no Towns....which means you'd rather have Randle, Donte, and 5 picks. Personally I'd just rather have IHart....but we had no control over that.
nedleeds
General Manager
Posts: 9,040
And1: 8,090
Joined: Dec 25, 2016
Location: Bridgeport, NY
Contact:
       

Re: Mikal Bridges is really good (when he's allowed to be) 

Post#74 » by nedleeds » Sun Mar 30, 2025 3:13 pm

spree2kawhi wrote:
Fury wrote:Lmao Knicks are 7-5 without Brunson this year but somehow this team is worse than last year’s team. Bridges maybe something to do with this?

I think it’s fair to say he and OG have broken out of their slump lately and we’ve won 3 out of the last 4.

We beat the Mavericks with a high school roster, the Wizards who are trying to lose every game by as many points as possible and then the Bucks without their 2nd, and 3rd best players.

We lost to two teams desperately trying to lose the prior 2 games. We suck. :crazy:
Zenzibar wrote:Nevertheless, Payton is not a finished product yet and unless the team moves him in a couple of weeks, I anticipate him trending upward with this coaching staff.
User avatar
thebuzzardman
RealGM
Posts: 81,190
And1: 94,796
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: Villanovknicks

Re: Mikal Bridges is really good (when he's allowed to be) 

Post#75 » by thebuzzardman » Sun Mar 30, 2025 3:46 pm

RHODEY wrote:
DimesandKnicks wrote:I'd rather have Donte and 5 picks

Then no Towns....which means you'd rather have Randle, Donte, and 5 picks. Personally I'd just rather have IHart....but we had no control over that.


Yup. There are multiple branches when comparing this team to "last years" team.

The version with IQ, RJ, Hart and Grimes still on it, but Donte off the bench?

The version with IQ, RJ, Hart and Grimes still on it, but Grimes off the bench?

The version where IQ and RJ were traded for OG, so that 1.5 months before Randle got hurt?

The version that was Brunson, Donte, Hart, OG, iShart after Randle got hurt?

The version where it that was Brunson, Donte, Hart, OG, iShart after Randle got hurt but Grimes was traded for Burks&Bogs?

TThe version where it that was Brunson, Donte, Hart, OG, iShart after Randle got hurt but Grimes was traded for Burks&Bogs but Mitch comes back for the playoffs for a few games?

Even in the offseason, it becomes:

Can't retain iShart
Trade 5 picks for Mikal
Trade Donte and Randle for KAT (or did I get the order wrong)

So, when anyone brings up "I wish the Knicks stayed with X", there are a bunch of different teams
Image
User avatar
thebuzzardman
RealGM
Posts: 81,190
And1: 94,796
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: Villanovknicks

Re: Mikal Bridges is really good (when he's allowed to be) 

Post#76 » by thebuzzardman » Sun Mar 30, 2025 3:47 pm

nedleeds wrote:
spree2kawhi wrote:
Fury wrote:Lmao Knicks are 7-5 without Brunson this year but somehow this team is worse than last year’s team. Bridges maybe something to do with this?

I think it’s fair to say he and OG have broken out of their slump lately and we’ve won 3 out of the last 4.

We beat the Mavericks with a high school roster, the Wizards who are trying to lose every game by as many points as possible and then the Bucks without their 2nd, and 3rd best players.

We lost to two teams desperately trying to lose the prior 2 games. We suck. :crazy:


The team without Brunson sucks.
The team with Brunson is good.
It's not a very good or great team.
Image
User avatar
Jalen Bluntson
RealGM
Posts: 25,310
And1: 26,985
Joined: Nov 07, 2012
       

Re: Mikal Bridges is really good (when he's allowed to be) 

Post#77 » by Jalen Bluntson » Sun Mar 30, 2025 4:35 pm

thebuzzardman wrote:
RHODEY wrote:
DimesandKnicks wrote:I'd rather have Donte and 5 picks

Then no Towns....which means you'd rather have Randle, Donte, and 5 picks. Personally I'd just rather have IHart....but we had no control over that.


Yup. There are multiple branches when comparing this team to "last years" team.

The version with IQ, RJ, Hart and Grimes still on it, but Donte off the bench?

The version with IQ, RJ, Hart and Grimes still on it, but Grimes off the bench?

The version where IQ and RJ were traded for OG, so that 1.5 months before Randle got hurt?

The version that was Brunson, Donte, Hart, OG, iShart after Randle got hurt?

The version where it that was Brunson, Donte, Hart, OG, iShart after Randle got hurt but Grimes was traded for Burks&Bogs?

TThe version where it that was Brunson, Donte, Hart, OG, iShart after Randle got hurt but Grimes was traded for Burks&Bogs but Mitch comes back for the playoffs for a few games?

Even in the offseason, it becomes:

Can't retain iShart
Trade 5 picks for Mikal
Trade Donte and Randle for KAT (or did I get the order wrong)

So, when anyone brings up "I wish the Knicks stayed with X", there are a bunch of different teams


Those teams never existed. Randle got hurt and OG was ruled out the very next game.

I have posted this before when the BS about January was hot topic and everyone hated the team early this season.

Brunson/DDV/Hart/Precious/Shart followed the January team, which was only together for 27 days. 14 games I believe. I think Precious started like 18 games after that. We had Bogs in and out and Burks and Deuce with that group. Sims wandering around in the background too.

Mitch came back with OG for like 10 games total maybe. Then we lost them both against the Pacers and Bogs was out already. We were running 7 man rotations.

Fun times.
:beer: RIP mags
nedleeds
General Manager
Posts: 9,040
And1: 8,090
Joined: Dec 25, 2016
Location: Bridgeport, NY
Contact:
       

Re: Mikal Bridges is really good (when he's allowed to be) 

Post#78 » by nedleeds » Sun Mar 30, 2025 5:16 pm

thebuzzardman wrote:
nedleeds wrote:
spree2kawhi wrote:I think it’s fair to say he and OG have broken out of their slump lately and we’ve won 3 out of the last 4.

We beat the Mavericks with a high school roster, the Wizards who are trying to lose every game by as many points as possible and then the Bucks without their 2nd, and 3rd best players.

We lost to two teams desperately trying to lose the prior 2 games. We suck. :crazy:


The team without Brunson sucks.
The team with Brunson is good.
It's not a very good or great team.


You know what time it is.

OUR TIME!

Zenzibar wrote:Nevertheless, Payton is not a finished product yet and unless the team moves him in a couple of weeks, I anticipate him trending upward with this coaching staff.
nedleeds
General Manager
Posts: 9,040
And1: 8,090
Joined: Dec 25, 2016
Location: Bridgeport, NY
Contact:
       

Re: Mikal Bridges is really good (when he's allowed to be) 

Post#79 » by nedleeds » Sun Mar 30, 2025 5:20 pm

thebuzzardman wrote:
RHODEY wrote:
DimesandKnicks wrote:I'd rather have Donte and 5 picks

Then no Towns....which means you'd rather have Randle, Donte, and 5 picks. Personally I'd just rather have IHart....but we had no control over that.


Yup. There are multiple branches when comparing this team to "last years" team.

The version with IQ, RJ, Hart and Grimes still on it, but Donte off the bench?

The version with IQ, RJ, Hart and Grimes still on it, but Grimes off the bench?

The version where IQ and RJ were traded for OG, so that 1.5 months before Randle got hurt?

The version that was Brunson, Donte, Hart, OG, iShart after Randle got hurt?

The version where it that was Brunson, Donte, Hart, OG, iShart after Randle got hurt but Grimes was traded for Burks&Bogs?

TThe version where it that was Brunson, Donte, Hart, OG, iShart after Randle got hurt but Grimes was traded for Burks&Bogs but Mitch comes back for the playoffs for a few games?

Even in the offseason, it becomes:

Can't retain iShart
Trade 5 picks for Mikal
Trade Donte and Randle for KAT (or did I get the order wrong)

So, when anyone brings up "I wish the Knicks stayed with X", there are a bunch of different teams


How about the version where we draft KP, trade Melo at that draft when he actually had a little value, literally sign nobody and do nothing except pick high for 3 more years?

... lol I just remembered we took Kevin Knox a pick ahead of Five Pick Mik and 2 ahead of SGA :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Zenzibar wrote:Nevertheless, Payton is not a finished product yet and unless the team moves him in a couple of weeks, I anticipate him trending upward with this coaching staff.
spree2kawhi
RealGM
Posts: 12,532
And1: 5,696
Joined: Mar 01, 2005

Re: Mikal Bridges is really good (when he's allowed to be) 

Post#80 » by spree2kawhi » Sun Mar 30, 2025 5:29 pm

thebuzzardman wrote:
nedleeds wrote:
spree2kawhi wrote:I think it’s fair to say he and OG have broken out of their slump lately and we’ve won 3 out of the last 4.

We beat the Mavericks with a high school roster, the Wizards who are trying to lose every game by as many points as possible and then the Bucks without their 2nd, and 3rd best players.

We lost to two teams desperately trying to lose the prior 2 games. We suck. :crazy:


The team without Brunson sucks.
The team with Brunson is good.
It's not a very good or great team.

I wouldn’t be surprised by a disappointing playoff exit, but I expect an entertaining, feel-good playoff run.

Return to New York Knicks