Lillard back home

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

User avatar
giannis and 1
Starter
Posts: 2,342
And1: 1,171
Joined: Jan 06, 2019
Location: Vancouver, BC
       

Re: Lillard back home 

Post#21 » by giannis and 1 » Thu Mar 20, 2025 1:38 pm

Not happening. Bucks are keeping him.
still learning the game

Matches Malone wrote:How did NBA fandom get to the point that it's more fun to thirst over players on other teams than to care more about your own team and players...
TheNetsFan
Head Coach
Posts: 7,419
And1: 2,818
Joined: Feb 11, 2007
   

Re: Lillard back home 

Post#22 » by TheNetsFan » Thu Mar 20, 2025 3:24 pm

JayMKE wrote:Bucks aren’t doing this anyways, we’re not obligated to send Dame where he wants to go just highest bidder. Not Simons(not good), bad Grant contract, scrub Thybulle. Portland gives up nothing and gets the best player.

Who would bid on him though?
Myth
RealGM
Posts: 11,781
And1: 10,440
Joined: Oct 01, 2008
   

Re: Lillard back home 

Post#23 » by Myth » Thu Mar 20, 2025 3:48 pm

TheNetsFan wrote:
JayMKE wrote:Bucks aren’t doing this anyways, we’re not obligated to send Dame where he wants to go just highest bidder. Not Simons(not good), bad Grant contract, scrub Thybulle. Portland gives up nothing and gets the best player.

Who would bid on him though?

Teams always have the option to keep a player if they don’t like the bids. It isn’t always highest bidder if they don’t like the bids in the first place, and I wouldn’t blame the Bucks here.
BlazersBroncos
RealGM
Posts: 12,336
And1: 9,883
Joined: Oct 27, 2016

Re: Lillard back home 

Post#24 » by BlazersBroncos » Thu Mar 20, 2025 4:24 pm

I probably would do this with the main goal in mind of moving off Grant's last year.
User avatar
Andre 2999
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,817
And1: 59
Joined: Dec 20, 2004
     

Re: Lillard back home 

Post#25 » by Andre 2999 » Thu Mar 20, 2025 5:37 pm

I'm surprised by the near unanimous rejection by Blazer fans. Man I would love to see a lineup of Dame/Sharpe/Avdija/Camara/Clingan. I think there's enough defensive firepower there to make up for Dame's deficiencies. And on offense, Dame would finally have a team that has options to play with. I also don't see Grant or Simons fetching a ton of value on the trade market, so why not use them to bring Dame home?

My only concern would be Scoot and Dame somehow fitting together. Scoot has shown great development since the calendar turned to 2025, and I would hate to ask him to continue coming off the bench for another 1-2 seasons. But all in all, with how much Dame means to Portland, I am likely taking this deal.
Myth
RealGM
Posts: 11,781
And1: 10,440
Joined: Oct 01, 2008
   

Re: Lillard back home 

Post#26 » by Myth » Thu Mar 20, 2025 6:07 pm

Andre 2999 wrote:I'm surprised by the near unanimous rejection by Blazer fans. Man I would love to see a lineup of Dame/Sharpe/Avdija/Camara/Clingan. I think there's enough defensive firepower there to make up for Dame's deficiencies. And on offense, Dame would finally have a team that has options to play with. I also don't see Grant or Simons fetching a ton of value on the trade market, so why not use them to bring Dame home?

My only concern would be Scoot and Dame somehow fitting together. Scoot has shown great development since the calendar turned to 2025, and I would hate to ask him to continue coming off the bench for another 1-2 seasons. But all in all, with how much Dame means to Portland, I am likely taking this deal.

I kind of copped out and pointed out the issues from Portland’s end, but I probably do actually do it. Scoot’s development was my only concern. That said, maybe Dame is good for his development. If Dame could help him with his shot (which is already improving), Scoot could be lethal by the time Dame is ready to take a back seat. Though, would Scoot ask out before that if development really does go well?

Return to Trades and Transactions